Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2005 archives arrow LED Digest 1994: Summer Cleaning!
LED Digest 1994: Summer Cleaning! Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
   Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
post, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
July 13, 2005                          Issue #1994
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW ======================

        --== Moderator Comments, What Happened to Them? ==--

                ~ Steve Birk
"...there has been a lull of some sort. Maybe it's a
summer thing here in the US, I don't know..."

                <Moderator Comment>
"It's a great time to explore where we are and
where we want to go."


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== SEO Pricing & False Economy ==--

                ~ Martha Retallick
"...the clients who respect you for your expertise
and experience are definitely out there."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Inbound Link Numbers ==--
                ~ Michael Martinez


======= NEW ======================================

From: Steve Birk
Subject: Moderator Comments, What Happened to Them?

In LED 1992, David Starr said, "I've been a bit disappointed with
where the list has gone in recent months". I'm not sure what it is
lately, but I kind of agree with his statement.

One thing I have noticed is the absence of any Moderator comments.
When I first subscribed back in the I-Sales day, it seemed like the
Moderator (John Audette at the time, and a few others since) would
step in and add comments to either further discussions of a topic,
to maybe change the direction of the discussion when deemed
necessary, or even to stimulate new discussions of hot button topics
maybe at a time when posts were low. All a lot of work for a
Moderator no doubt, and work I'm glad I'm not in charge of doing or
getting done.

The LED Digest is one email that I would pretty much read all the
way through, word for word, and I have learned and hope to continue
to keep learning from those who take the time to post. The last few
weeks or so I find that I am skimming quite a bit. There does seem
to be something missing as of late.

I am still confident that LED Digest is still the premier email
discussion list on Internet Marketing and Business available, and
that the list is moderated by a well qualified and knowledgeable
individual to lead the subscribers down a road of continued
knowledge and learning.

Lately though, there has been a lull of some sort. Maybe it's a
summer thing here in the US, I don't know...

I realize that there is only so much room for posts and I am
certainly not saying a Moderator comment is required for each post,
or even each edition. All I am trying to say is that it seems as
though this list has been on 'auto-pilot' mode for a little bit now,
and maybe we need the 'Captain' to get on the microphone and tell us
what we are flying over every once in a while. ;-)

Regards,

Steve Birk, Emergency Med Tech
www.medcenternews.com

<Moderator Comment>

Thanks very much for your comments, Steve. I'm appreciative of what
this list has become and that you care so much about its growth.

You're absolutely right -- I've been out of it lately. For the last
several months I've been distracted and less inclined to dedicate my
time to the LED and other discussion lists and publishing projects.
I owe you an explanation, and maybe a comment or two, about where
the list is heading. (As if it's up to me -- I consider this list as
"run" by you, the subscribers -- and myself as more of a caretaker.)

First of all the quick and personal: my newly wedded wife, Sally, is
pregnant and our baby is due in late September. That's enough to
rock the boat a bit. :-) I'm also in school again full time, which
takes lots of time and effort. Needless to say, I've had my
opportunities for distraction. Phew -- those fraternity parties
really take a toll on you! (completely kidding, of course... at my
age it'd be a bit like Will Ferrell in the movie Old School...)

As my attention has been slowly removed from the list and placed
elsewhere, the quality here has definitely slid. And I think you
make a terrific point about the "summer lull". This time of year
always slows way down, as I'm seeing on a couple of normally active
discussion lists.

Enough about me -- what about you? What are your comments,
criticisms, hopes and dreams? Or at least, what do you want in the
LED? It's a great time to explore where we are and where we want to
go.

Let me know!

Thanks for ripping the sheet off the corpse, Steve. I feel better
already. :-)

Best wishes,
Adam


===== CONTINUING =================================

From: Martha Retallick
Subject: SEO Pricing & False economy

> ... how crazy is my pricing structure, and how crazy is this
> client? Am I a fool for selling this service for so cheap, or for
> thinking that I can get paid for over ten years of experience?
        - Robert Bedard, LED 1987

Here's my US $.02 worth:

I tell my clients straight-out that they should expect to pay at
least $1,000 for their first year of search engine positioning work.

I'm also not afraid to tell them that I have been in the web design
business for a decade, that I've learned a lot of things during that
time that could benefit them, and that I'm not the cheapest designer
in town.

The above paragraph has precisely the desired effect on the
price-shoppers: It sends them running for the hills.

Robert, the clients who respect you for your expertise and
experience are definitely out there. And those people are more than
willing to pay what those things are worth. But, word of warning,
they're not going to do so if you focus on competing on price.

After all, people who are loyal to the dollar are never loyal to you.

Martha Retallick

Western Sky Communications
http://www.westernskycommunications.com


==== BILLBOARD ===================================

From: Michael Martinez
Subject: Inbound links

> Why would Google show 67 inbound links, Yahoo 500
> and MSN 2200? And what's the easiest thing to do about it?
        - Michael Linehan, LED 1993

Google has been showing only partial inbound links for a couple of
years to discourage SEO specialists from running queries against
their database.

Generally speaking, you can estimate the number of links Google has
indexed by dividing the number of links Yahoo! reports by .9.  That
is only an approximation, and you cannot be sure that Google has
indexed everything Yahoo! and MSN report.  In fact, a recent study
suggests there is considerably less overlap in the databases than
has been previously estimated by third parties.

Google is not as sensitive to inbound linkage as Yahoo! anyway.
Most Google rankings can be optimized through other factors.  Only a
relatively few search expressions have been so hyperoptimized that
you MUST obtain large numbers of inbound links to rank well on
Google.

Michael Martinez
http://www.michael-martinez.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2005 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"The most terrifying thing is to accept oneself completely."
- Carl Gustav Jung