Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2006 archives arrow LED Digest 2259: Using Misspellings to Advantage
LED Digest 2259: Using Misspellings to Advantage Print E-mail
How misspelling your keyword phrases, and using other modifiers, can help
a site rank well and stay relevant. Also, when high rankings don't convert,
you know it's time to examine the site. Plus tons more in this issue.

==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
Hosting and Domain Registration from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
October 4, 2006                    Issue no. 2259
..............................................



            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....
                

==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Rankings Up, Sales Down ==--

                ~ Michael Linehan
"So your PR and Alexa rank are irrelevant."

                ~ James Miller
"You need a redesign immediately."

        --== Form Spam ==--

                ~ Chris Nielsen
"...we have had very good response to reporting
spam to many of the free hosting sites..."

        --== Meta Tags (and More) ==--

                ~ Brad Waller
"Our site is a poster child for the long tail..."

                ~ Shari Thurow
"There is a BIG difference between spidering
and indexing, and indexing and relevancy."

                ~ Cyril Hallard
"Just a comment here, based on recent posts..."

        --== Click Fraud ==--

                ~ Greg Marquess
"Everyone who has been reading these posts
must go out and...get the magazine."

        --== Linking ==--

                ~ Dirk Johnson
"I am not an apologist for reciprocal linking."

        --== Small Biz Sites ==--

                ~ Rick Gortatowsky
"[Search engines] are not that important if one
uses creativity and a good business plan."


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Michael Linehan
Subject: Rankings Up, Sales Down

> Can anyone tell me why my ranking continues
> to rise... but sales seem to continue to go down?

> I had a severe drop in sales that happened overnight
> about three years ago...
        - Angelo Simone, LED 2258
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1092/55/

Well Angelo, you just said it.  You did something three years ago
that caused a severe drop in sales.  In other words, what's to
explain?  The first thing is maybe to reverse that.

But even if that is fixed, I'd say there's another fundamental
problem. What you describe and what I see is that the site and your
tactics are all over the place.  Do your customers really want to
buy slot machines too?  Terri's jewelry?  Printer cartridges?  Does
your site speak to your clients - Do they read purple, green and red
type on black?  Many people won't.  Are the people you want to reach
looking at and responding to PPC ads? (Apparently not.)

So your PR and Alexa rank are irrelevant. Your position in Google
doesn't ultimately matter. Even your traffic doesn't really matter,
as such.  All these tactics and figures are like a bunch of
flashlights flicking on and off while being pointed randomly in
every direction.  You'll hit a few sales here and there, but not
much.  This all needs to be turned into a coherent and integrated
plan, like turning all that flashlight energy into a laser.
Reworking the home page is just another tactic that means nothing if
you're not reaching and bringing in the right people.

So figure out who are you selling to and want to sell to. Understand
what they want.  And figure out how you can you reach them
repeatedly, powerfully and inexpensively. When you can answer those
three points, you're half way home (or more!). If you can REALLY
answer these points, fully and clearly, the implementation is easy.
Everything you do will be markedly, perhaps enormously, more
effective.

Michael Linehan

Marketing Alchemy
www.marketing-alchemy.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: James Miller
Subject: Sales decreasing

This may be a hard response, but good design increases sales and bad
design decreases them.

1. Your main problem is that your site is white on black.  It may be
fashionable but it's a bad idea.  Punters do not like this, as they
can't print it to show others what they are looking to buy.

2. The entry point to the site is also not on the first browser full.

3. You also scroll down and down and the page goes on with lots of
logos and is very confusing.

4. Why put all the credit card logos on the front page.  Everyone
knows that a good on-line site allows all those.

You need a redesign immediately.

James Miller

Daisy Analysis
www.daisy.co.uk


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Chris Nielsen
Subject: Form spam

> ... does anyone know of a way to stop persistent spammers
> who use the response form on my website...?
        - Dan Rosenfield, LED 2257
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1081/55/

The CAPCHA solution is probably the best, but if you don't have any
need for non-USA traffic, we can provide a list of IP addresses that
can be added to your Linux server's .htaccess file that will block
many ranges of IPs that are the source of a lot of the spam. The
spammers tend to use open proxy servers which makes them hard to
reach. If anyone would like this list please contact me via email
using webmaster1 at our domain http://www.deny-from.com/. We are
planning to publish this list on the site at some point, but your
email made me realize that others may be hurting as we have been
over this issue.

The list is in the format of "deny from 10.11.12.13" and does block
a few US IP ranges that have servers, but we didn't block any ISPs
like Comcast although we are starting to see form spam from there
now also. It makes me think spammers are getting home users to
install something that can then be used to send the spam, but I
can't confirm this.

For those that have and can administer Windows web servers, my
partner installed this program,
http://www.aspemporium.com/aspapps.asp?eid=54 which allows you to
block single IPs or entire ranges. We have 11 classified ad sites
that were getting hammered by ad spammers, and many advertisers were
getting scam emails and a few were taken in and lost money. Over the
past year or so we have blocked sources and now get very little,
which we also block. We don't like blocking most of Nigeria, Korea,
India, Pakistan, Romania, etc. but we refuse to put up with this
kind of stuff. If you get the app and want our list, please let me
know and I'll see if I can get the database or at least a list for
you.

By the way, we have had very good response to reporting spam to many
of the free hosting sites that you see listed. And reports of
spamvertised blogs at blogger.com sent to support at blogger.com
seem to get the spam blogs removed. For spammer sites that are
directly owned by the spammers, we have taken great satisfaction in
downloading their entire sites many times. Since many of these spam
sites are very large, the bandwidth usage can be considerable and
may push them over their allocation, either resulting in the site
being taken off-line or costing them extra hosting charges. I
downloaded one a few times and hit the 1GB mark. I use a spare
computer with extra drive space and load in spam site URLs into
HTTrack Website Copier (http://www.httrack.com).

Thanks,

Chris Nielsen
http://www.mesothelioma-search-engine.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Brad Waller
Subject: Meta tags

Derek Andrews [issue 2258
http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1092/55/ ] wanted more
specifics on the mis-spelled word.  While my example does not fit
exactly the same case, I can get him data if he wants on a similar
case.  We realized back in 1994 that people can't spell "Volkswagen"
correctly and often use "Volkswagon" instead.  This example does not
fit the case of "meta tag only" that was being discussed, but I do
think that this is relevant data.

One of the pages we set up as the equivalent of a site map back then
is a search results page for our categories.  One of which is VW
cars.  Search for "volkswagon for sale" (no quotes) and our page
(http://epage.com/classifieds/Volkswagon_for_sale.html) ends up on
top.  We do use the word in more than the meta tag

Our site is a poster child for the long tail, as we last month we
had over 18,000 different search phrases bringing in over 55,000
unique visitors.  I could only review the top 5,000 phrases.  Of
those, ten phrases included "volkswagon" and accounted for 60
visitors.  The correct "volkswagen" of course did better (mostly I
think because the search engines now show you the correct spelling)
with 25 terms and 149 visitors.

What I can't determine because this is too detailed for the
analytics program (I can only look at the top 5,000 of 80,000 unique
pages) is where all those people went.  I am sure many went directly
to a classified ad that had the mis-spelling, as I just discovered
that the above page is not enabled for analytics.  DOH!

So, if the term is important, find a way to use it on your site.  It
does not have to be the home page.  You can have a page about the
mis-spelling explaining that the term is really spelled differently
and this site can help you, etc. And if that page has the term in
the title, meta tags, and body, then you have it covered for the
search engines and the page is a useful page for real people.

Brad Waller

Manage and Sell your own site advertising
http://adjungle.com
waller, adjungle.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Shari Thurow
Subject: Meta-tag keywords

Hi all-

This is in response to the thread about meta-tag keywords. It's been
an interesting discussion thread.

I have to say this because I honestly do not believe that people, in
general, understand some important technical terms when it comes to
search engine optimization. There is a BIG difference between
spidering and indexing, and indexing and relevancy.

The spidering / crawling process is all about access. Search engines
will not put any Web document in their database (index) unless they
can retrieve it from a URL (Web address) first.

The index is a subset of the spidered information. And just because
a search engine indexes text on a page does not mean that the text
is used to determine relevancy (ie positioning).

That being said, most of the commercial Web search engines do not
use content in the meta-tag keywords attribute to determine
relevancy. I understand that people are going to put misspellings in
that tag, as I would recommend anyway. However, a misspelled company
name is not a very common search. About the only place one might see
it is in the keywords attribute.

To give the meta-tag keywords attribute such "weight" for that
reason? I would say there are far more important tags to focus on,
not only from an SEO perspective but a usability perspective as well.

In my experience, the only exception I make to this rule is when I
build a site search engine that uses meta-tag keywords and
descriptions to determine relevancy. Then, purely for usability
purposes (I want my site search results to be accurate), I will
focus a bit more on the keywords attribute. Data mining my site
search engine data will help me determine the best words and
misspellings to put in the keywords attribute. But that's a whole
different ballgame.

I don't mean to sound rude or condescending when I say the
following. I became a better SEO because I chose to learn as much as
I can about the entire information retrieval process. I know it's
really really hard not to use anecdotal evidence or personal
experience as proof. Hey, I've done it myself many times. I think
it's great when LEDers share their experiences. But please open your
eyes and learn more about some of the technical aspects of SEO.
Believe me, once you understand how information retrieval systems
really work, you stop obsessing over the little things.

Sincerely,

Shari Thurow
Grantastic Designs, Inc.


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Cyrille Hallard
Subject: Meta tags

Hello,

Just a comment here, based on recent posts, we all seem to agree
that Tittle and Description tags are important. However, if I'm
correct, if this one is listed in DMOZ, the description appearing in
Google or MSN is the over written. Yahoo keeps your description.

Original site:

- Title: IT careers and IT jobs in Canada

- Description: IT-Careers.ca, through a pertinent and accurate list
of canadian information technology companies, assists you to
directly access a company through the career opportunity page or the
main entry page.

--------------------

DMOZ:

- Title: Information Technology Careers

Description: Provides a list of canadian information technology
companies, providing links to directly access career opportunity
listings.

--------------------

Google:

- Title: IT careers and IT jobs in Canada

- Description: Provides a list of canadian information technology
companies, providing links to directly access career opportunity
listings.

--------------------

Yahoo:

- Title:            IT careers and IT jobs in Canada

- Description: IT-Careers.ca, through a pertinent and accurate list
of canadian information ... Toronto Ottawa Montreal Vancouver
Calgary Edmonton St John's Halifax Winnipeg ...

--------------------

MSN:

- Title: IT careers and IT jobs in Canada

- Description: Provides a list of canadian information technology
companies, providing links to directly access career opportunity
listings.

Best regards

Cyril Hallard
http://www.it-careers.ca


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Greg Marquess
Subject: Click Fraud - Fortune and Business Week

> ... main-stream business publishers and organizations
> are finally waking up to the apparent breadth and viciousness
> of [click fraud]. See the results of a major Business Week
> investigation...
        - David Yancey, LED 2253
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1072/55/

The Business Week cover heading (October 2, 2006) is "Click Fraud,
The Dark Side of Online Advertising".  Everyone who has been reading
these posts must go out and drop 5 dollars and get the magazine.

Renee [Kennedy, issue 2255
http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1075/55/ ] posted some good
points on the article but you have to see the article to understand
the depth and sheer complexity of this problem.  It cannot be
explained by me in this post.  You have to read the article yourself
to understand the dynamics of how the scam (orchestrated by the
Search Engines) actually works.  It is the cover story and a very
good one at that.

Also see Fortune Magazine (same week, on display until 10/9).  The
cover reads "Chaos @ Google".  The story gives an in depth look at
the company and does speak at decent length about their "dependence"
on ad dollars.  Reading the story makes you wonder how Google ever
got where it is, much less having a plan for sustaining itself.  On
a tour of their headquarters the writer describes what he sees as a
$125b company with nobody really sure of who is in control.

The Business Week article is better as far as the click fraud issue
is concerned.  However, the Fortune article paints a picture of
Google, and the likelihood they may be heading south much quicker
than anyone thinks.  There are a litany of examples (the 900mil deal
with MySpace which they got burned on, lack of a solid business or
finance model; their Google Finance Unit... which does not generate
any revenue, etc.)

Both are good reading but do not miss out on the Biz Week article.
It will completely change the way you think about click fraud and
the way you viewed it in the past.

Greg Marquess


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Dirk Johnson
Subject: Linking

> Many other SEO's are reciprocal link apologists
> and claim reciprocal links still work regardless
> of what they hear from Matt Cutts.
        - Mike Banks Valentine, LED 2257
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1081/55/

Mike, I am not an apologist for reciprocal linking. I am an avid
advocate, when it is done properly. What we do here is in full
compliance with everything that Matt Cutts has said with respect to
reciprocation. We reciprocate with sites in the same realm of
interest, responsibly.

The proof is in the results. One must look beyond what they want to
read, and read what is actually being said, and compare that with
real search results.

So, with 8 years of successful experience, I choose to continue to
do what has worked well for our clients, throughout every Google
update, while making no apologies or concessions. I have no need to
do either.

Best regards,

Dirk Johnson, Partner - Operations

DomainDrivers LLC
www.domaindrivers.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Rick Gortatowsky
Subject: Small biz search

> I knew we'd only succeed if we did something unique and
> could promote virally... Strategy and creativity makes money,
> you don't have to sit around trying to copy what "the big guys
> on the web" are doing (or work for them).
        - Mark Whitman, LED 2255
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1075/55/

Strategy... a business plan is essential for any business on or off
the web. Creativity counts as well for business. However, this
discussion started out as a discussion on "Search Engines" and the
importance. They are NOT that important IF one uses ones creativity
and a good business plan. Again, building mechanisms and utilizing
those others have built to retain and draw traffic simply does
better than any Search Engine ever has.

It's ever so obvious to me you have not developed much in the way of
eCommerce sites, hard goods. We have done many and the FIRST thing
we tell clients is to seek out areas such as Internet forums and
sites that relate to the products they wish to sell. Establish a
mailing list... don't wait. Never rely on external sites like search
engines etc. to draw traffic. The best traffic is drawn by working
to obtain it through link exchanges, forums, points of interest that
target the end consumer.

I find it unique that you were working on an adult site. A
individual in our community sells natural sexual stimulants etc. on
the Internet. He quite properly targeted working with adult sites
and could care less about the Search Engines. He sells the various
compounds for $40-$60 for a 30 day supply. I cannot even begin to
tell you how much money he has made. His average daily postal bill
ranges $2000-$3000 at $5 shipping a pop basically. He owns a
beautiful house on the lake he had built, a condo in Florida and one
in California, a new vette, a Hummer, 2 boats, jet skis... pretty
much anything he wants he can buy. Nothing special about his web at
all... What IS special is he was smart enough to realize he needed
to target the customer and that CANNOT be effectively done in search
engines.

I explain it like this... Search Engines are just like a pool of
millions and millions of people. The webmaster is attempting by
ranking etc. to filter those people and in competition with
countless others trying to do the same. The smart SMALL business
targets this, certainly... but it is NOT the focus where BEST TIME
is spent. Best time is spent attempting to find and CREATE site(s)
where the targeted customer spends time and make deals with the
sites. Then create BETTER sites than those and latch the clientel.

We are a software vendor as well as a development house. Software is
VERY competitive on the net to sell and its a natural seller. People
use computers to access the web, software makes computers do what
they do what they do. While we have moved away from software sales
to some extent when we were highly focused on the sales end of
things we were ranked 84th in the word in software sales by Dunn &
Bradstreet all from a $1000 start up.

The small business tries to GURU over seach engines, over and over
and over and its one of the biggest reasons they often fail. One can
be a needle in a haystack in search engines. Atop that as I noted,
it's like having millions and millions of people in a field and
yelling, "Anyone out there want to buy culinary goods and
materials!!!!!". Some will respond. But, if instead one targets
sites that have recipes, cooking this and that... One makes one's
own sites that target the BUYERS now one is making mechinisms for
continued growth and success. With every sale consumated the user
gets a free month or year or whatall to your recipes site, can post
their recipes... One can train things anyway one likes for best
results.

It's simply nuts to spend all ones time trying to get traffic from
say google. As I noted, we had gobs and gobs of pages ranked in top
10 searches at Google, MSN and others over the years. The traffic
derived was just nothing in comparison to focused targeting of sites
where we KNOW the actual customers hang out for our product. Its
just common sense.

Rick Gortatowsky


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2006 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Integrity has no need of rules." - Albert Camus