Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2005 archives arrow LED Digest 2057: Marketing by Radio, also VoIP vs Landlines
LED Digest 2057: Marketing by Radio, also VoIP vs Landlines Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
   Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
post, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
December 19, 2005                      Issue #2057
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== NEW =======================

        --== Voice Over IP vs Landlines ==--

                ~ Viggie Bala
"IP phones seem capable to [replace] good
old telephones..."

        --== Radio Marketing ==--

                ~ Tom Aman
"...radio is still a very, very powerful medium..."

        --== Screen Display Sizing ==--

                ~ Paul Bromby
"Does anyone know what the statistics are
now for screen display size?"


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Linking with AdSense ==--

                ~ Steve Pronger
"Picture this: a store that actually sold nothing."

        --== The Reciprocal Linking Thread ==--

                ~ Dirk Johnson
"Each link is a relatively inexpensive
marketing opportunity..."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== pair.com ==--
                ~ Rod Aries


======== NEW =====================================

From: Viggie Bala
Subject: Missing out on VoIP

Hi Adam,

I have not responded immediately to your call on reader's views
partly because of the long winding link debates in LED - which I
tend to skip more regularly these days, and partly because I am more
into another exciting internet development that is completely
ignored here.

Readers of LED will surely have at least a brush with the VoIP
technology.  The companies that purchased VoIP servers or phone
accounts now increasingly use IP phone calls than emails to their
branches, group companies etc.  The features and facilities of VoIP
services are growing very fast every day.

The IP-PBX servers that work like an office intercom (but sits on
office LAN) now supports Instant Messaging, besides wireless IP
phones have started appearing in the market.  These communication
devices depend entirely on the internet and have to be maintained
via web browsers.

Besides office based server solutions, now one can purchase call
minutes for various countries online, and use an IP phone connected
to broadband.  I am interested to hear from fellow LEders on their
experience in using these services.

Email effectively replaced the snail (postal) mails at least for
personal use.   I can't remember when was the last time I handwrote
a letter and sent thru post to my friends or relatives.   The change
is unnoticeable and smooth.  We don't long for the goold old days in
this area (of posting a letter and waiting for a week for it to
reach another country).

The IP phones seems capable to do the same to good old telephones,
and in double quick time than it took email to replace postal mails.

Regards,

Viggie Bala

Helping Websites to Work
http://www.viggie.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Tom Aman
Subject: Radio

> And radio could be the subject of another thread
> altogether; I had no idea it could be so powerful.
        - Noah Masterson, LED 2055

Noah was commenting on the unexpected effect on site visits and
sales after his wife was interviewed for a local radio show.  I can
give you another story along those same lines.  Bear with me, it
takes awhile to get to the point of all this.

We have a local woman (Ellen Kellaway) who runs a store that
combines knitting and (wait for it...) hunting.  It is called the
Knitting Nimrod. Ellen is an avid knitter and she loves to hunt (and
fish).  She is a bit of a local character but she is very good
hearted and she is also a walking encyclopedia on local background
and history and on some areas of antiques things.  One of her loves
is vintage buttons (and some vintage buttons are worth a lot of
money - just check out eBay).  There is a specialty channel TV
program call "The Antique Hunter" where the host visits various and
often unusual places to show off a wide variety of antiques.
Somehow the host heard about Ellen and so did part of one program on
her and her buttons.

Obviously, people in the broadcast industry do a lot of networking
(pun not intended).  So, a few weeks later Ellen got a phone call
from a gentleman called Stewart MacLean who hosts a weekly RADIO
show called The Vinyl Cafe on the Canadian CBC network.  Stewart's
show is kind of folksy with a bit of music, a bit of humor, some fun
and/or heart-warming stories, etc (my wife and I are fans).  The
shows are taped at various venues across Canada and he had an
upcoming show to be taped here, in Belleville, Ontario.

His researchers had been talking with the Antique Hunter researchers
with the result that Stewart wanted to talk with Ellen.  He was
intrigued by the knitting / hunting combination, also he picked up a
lot of information on local stuff that he used on his show.  The
show that had been taped here was broadcast on CBC radio a week or
two after it was taped.  At the opening of the show he got a little
humor out of the knitting / hunting store, talking about the number
of male hunters learning knitting and the number of female knitters
learning hunting (the male hunters learning knitting is actually
true, I don't know about the other part).

Fast forward a couple of days:  the number of hits on Ellen's Web
site went through the roof (even though the actual URL had not been
given on the radio program) and her email volume went way up.  But
the biggest surprise to her was the number of emails that came from
places on the other side of the world - like little South Pacific
Islands.  What she didn't realize was that, in addition to their
short wave service, the CBC stations, like many others, also
broadcast via the Internet and these broadcasts are heard by a world
wide audience (they have a very dedicated following).  The result
has been some unexpected business, with some people, particularly
from the US, actually planning their vacation itineraries so that
they can visit her store.

For those who might be interested in the background details:

Ellen's Web site is at http://www.knittingnimrod.com/

CBC radio can be found at http://www.cbc.ca.  They actually run two
networks called Radio One and Radio Two (and are presently in the
process of deploying satelite broadcasting on Radio 3).  The
programming for all of these is available on line.  Radio Two is
mostly classical (often with a good bit of humor), Radio One is a
bit of everything.  Stewart MacLean's Vinyl Cafe can be heard at
10AM (Eastern Time) on Saturdays on Radio Two or at 12 noon (Eastern
Time) on Sundays on Radio One.

All of this just confirms that radio is still a very, very powerful
medium and even a small mention can have a huge impact (some of the
best advertising cannot be bought for money), particularly if the
station happens to also broadcast on the Internet.

Tom Aman

Aman Software
http://www.cyberspyder.com
Home of CyberSpyder Link Test


-------- new post - new topic -------

From: Paul Bromby
Subject: Screen display Size

Some years ago there was a statistic about the screen display size
that people were using:

- 640x480 pixels:       20%
- 800x600 pixels:       50%
- 1024x768 pixels:      30%

Many prominent sites, like for instance, news.bbc.co.uk, still stick
to a smaller screen format.

Our policy is to design for 1024x768 on sites with corporate
clientele, but to stick with 800x600 if we believe there will be
visitors with older computers.

Does anyone know what the statistics are now for screen display size?

Paul Bromby
www.pdcnet.org.uk
info, pdcnet.org.uk


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Steve Pronger
Subject: Linking

> Go to any mall, how many ads for other stores do you
> see in a specialty shop? How many flyers promoting
> other businesses are handed to you? Take the hint.
        - Robert Bass, LED 2055

What if the store owner was paid every time a customer took a flyer?
And not just quarters, $5, $10 and more?

Picture this; a store that actually sold nothing. Instead, you walk
in to find information, displays, advice and resources on a niche
that is of particular interest to you. Neatly integrated amongst the
displays are those income-producing flyers promoting
topically-related products and services from outside suppliers.
Would you enter that store? I would. It would be a lot like a
content-driven, Adsense "monitized" website don't you think?

Agreed, AdSense isn't for everyone. For e-commerce sites designed
specifically to sell a particular product they will detract from
your sales. But to leave a site for no other reason than it has a
few text ads on it seems self-defeating to me. I leave a site if the
content doesn't hold my attention, not the presence of a few ads. If
those ads are thoughtfully integrated and topically relevant then I
will occasionally click on them. If I was alone, Google wouldn't be
generating billions in income for themselves and their partner
publishers.

>... a commercial website is there to promote
> and sell products or services FOR MONEY.

A commercial website is there to make money. The income generated
from Adsense looks just the same to me as that generated by any
other means. I suspect this guy, Jason Calacanis, has a similar
opinion:

http://snipurl.com/kvzt  [calacanis.com]

LONG LIVE LED!

Cheers

Steve Pronger
http://www.stevepronger.com


------- new post - related topic ------

From: Dirk Johnson
Subject: Linking

> In that vein, I thought I'd comment on some unintended,
> but positive, consequences of adding links on our site,
> dc-baby.com...The unintended result occurred when
> a local radio show interviewed my wife about the book.
        - Noah Masterson, LED 2055

Thanks Noah,

What you experienced is unique, but it is not unusual that proper
linking generates secondary benefits for a site. Those benefits can
be far reaching and fundamental, or sometimes just novel. Sales are
made, new dealers and affiliates are found, press and newsletter
mentions get written, good search results derive from it, and on and
on.

Links beget links. That is well known. Links help sites get noticed.
The World Wide Web is, quite literally, built on links. HTML is an
acronym for Hyper-Text Markup Language, and "hyper-text" is merely
geek speak for...a link. The more links you have, the larger your
reach, and subsequently, the more opportunity you have to get more
links. That's pretty fundamental.

Avoiding good and relevant links that are readily available is a
very curious approach to marketing a website. Frankly, it baffles me
that some people actually advise just that.

You never know who might take notice, such as your local radio host.
Without links, it may never have happened. In fact, for many niche
portal sites, they used good link directories as a primary visitor
feature of their sites, long before Google came along and rewarded
them for it. YAHOO! itself was originally a link directory. People
are attracted to useful and relevant link directories, especially
niche-subject directories.

Proper reciprocal linking requires work, patience, discipline, and,
for best success, gracious cooperation with other site owners who
offer to do it. Maybe this kind of mutual cooperation runs counter
to some people's thinking. They'd prefer to be islands unto
themselves. So be it. They'll get none of the primary, or secondary,
benefits of linking with other cooperative, relevant sites.

I just find it fascinating that those in the anti-reciprocal link
crowd stridently advise others to follow their own path. They always
say, "Hey, look it worked for me! I don't need those links". Could
they be doing even better, if they weren't so constrained? Can they
guarantee that not doing it will work of your site, too? And what if
it doesn't?

In one recent post here, Michael Martinez said that "The average
business site needs fewer than 100 inbound links in order to
accomplish these goals." To be fair, he was referring specifically
to search engine indexing. I am not here to argue that statement,
since I look beyond the search engine benefits. But I would point
out that, using an automotive site as an example, there are proven
to be hundreds and hundreds of relevant reciprocal links available
to any other automotive site that wants to do the work and earn
them. That kind of link popularity provides substantial reach, and a
considerable primary and secondary benefit. I guess some people
would prefer to turn their back on that.

I am an old marketing / sales grunt, with 25 years in business,
covering a wide variety of roles. Sometimes, with some endeavors,
things got lean. So any opportunity to get the word out was welcome.
That's how I look at reciprocal linking. Each link is a relatively
inexpensive marketing opportunity that is either pursued, or wasted.

But then again, I still pick up pennies off the sidewalk....

Best regards,

Dirk Johnson, Partner - Operations

DomainDrivers LLC
www.domaindrivers.com


==== BILLBOARD ===================================

From: Rod Aries
Subject: pair.com

Adam, i don't know if you want comments like this, but it is true,
and is good for pair...

This is not in response to anything other than the pair.com
advertising that appears in each LED issue.  It is sometimes easy to
ignore them due to the constant drip, drip, drip nature of the ads
because they are always there, and you tend to become desensitized
to them - but you shouldn't.

I have over 100 accounts at pair, and I have had them at pair for
several years. This email is in regards to an upgrade they just
installed on all their servers to fight spam.  Because I have been
on the net for almost a decade, and I own over 13,000 domains, I
have had many of my email addresses culled, spidered, scraped, sold,
exchanged and indexed, including, probably, posts I have done
previously to LED.

About 9 months ago I was easily receiving between 50,000 and 60,000
email each and every day.  I contacted pair several months ago to
see what they could do (they are actually one of the few companies
that responds to support requests in not only a prompt manner, but a
competent manner as well) to reduce my spam.  That little "wahoo"
you heard occurred when they did an interim spam filter upgrade and
my spam email dropped to only 2-3,000 emails a day getting through
to my Eudora account, then fighting through hundreds of filters.
While that still is a good deal of spam, I was stoked to only be
receiving that much -  I mean how much Vl@---gra can I really order?

Anyways, they just installed their latest update to their servers
and I am now down to about 200 spam emails a day -- I can only
imagine how much the 50,000 to 60,000 daily spams has increased.

So, besides good ol' fashioned quality hosting at a cheap price with
exceptional customer service, they now have given me back my
computer - no more 5 minute downloads of emails every 20 minutes.

As you may have understood, I am very pleased with their service,
and I am not even a paid representative or an affiliate.

:)
rod aries


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2005 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"A loving person lives in a loving world. A hostile person lives in
a hostile world. Everyone you meet is your mirror." - Ken Keys