Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2004 archives arrow LED Digest 1735: Trademark & Keywords, also Good Pop-ups
LED Digest 1735: Trademark & Keywords, also Good Pop-ups Print E-mail

==================================================
                The LED Digest
            Moderated Discussion List
    "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

        pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
  Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
 pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                      Published by:
Adam Audette                            LED Digest
adam,led-digest.com      http://www.led-digest.com
................................................
January 26, 2004                      Issue #1735
................................................


           .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Affiliate ID Rip Off? ==--

                ~ Debra Sawyers
"This was a 'feature' of Gator and once people
caught on, it was a huge blowup."

        --== Web Ad Trademark Laws ==--

                ~ George Forder
"Ownership of a word is a major objective
of most branding strategies."

                ~ Rick Meigs
"Business Week just published an article
that gives an overview of this issue."

        --== Ad Blocking Software ==--

                ~ Steve Fleming
"Everyone wants a free web, with free content,
and free search engines. "

                ~ Mark Whitman
"Proper use of pop-ups is an excellent way of
allowing users to tailor their experience..."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Local Sites, Local Hosting? ==--
                ~ Sascha Hewitt

        --== Beta Testers Wanted ==--
                ~ Brad Waller


===== CONTINUING =================================

From: Debra Sawyers
Subject: Affiliate stealing

> I have a creeping suspicion that someone is stealing
> my affiliate commissions by replacing my ID string in
> the merchant's URL with their own. Is there a way to
> prevent this...?
        - Heikki Nylund, LED 1734

I wouldn't be surprised if you're correct.  A number of spyware /
thiefware programs have been coded with the ability to actually
change affiliate strings so that users with these programs installed
(often bundled programs installed with shareware programs) are
actually stealing affiliate links.

The act is totally undetectable to the user.  This was (and maybe
still is) a "feature" of Gator and once people caught on, it was a
huge blowup.

Unwantedlinks.com appears to have a good article on "Who's stealing
your affiliate earnings", http://www.unwantedlinks.com/affiliatetheft.htm

One of the most frustrating aspects is that Gator and WhenU have
already one their first rounds in court against Uhaul who sued for
serving competitors ads to users on their site.  Courts ruled that
since installation of these spyware programs is voluntary, users
give Gator et al the right to modify the functions of their
browsers.  http://netscape.com.com/2100-1104-5072663.html

This was even discussed back in LED issue 1576:

---------------------
From: Robert McRackan
Subject: Gator Stealing Affiliate Sales?

If there is any way that I could be more shocked at Mr. Schneider's
pro-Gator letter, I'm not sure how!

Not only have I never seen or heard about a single positive comment
of Gator and the GAIN network (prior to his letter), but I can also
personally attest to the damage it does to PCs and the damage it
does to business.

My last job was as the Affiliate Account Administrator at a dot-com
with an in-house affiliate program of over 40,000 people. (The
company still has a lawsuit pending with GAIN so I'll not say their
name.)

Within a week of Gator / GAIN signing up, their profits skyrocketed
and the profits of all other affiliates plummeted by a comparable
amount. When 4 out of our top 5 affiliates noticed the sharp and
sudden decline in their profits, I asked our IT team to look into
it.

After much frustration, our IT team discovered that computers with
Gator software installed on them were replacing any tracking
referral IDs with the one they signed up with. Basically, my site
"abc.com" has an affiliate program, the progress of which is tracked
with affiliate ID numbers so that they work even if cookies are
disabled.

A surfer visits an affiliate of ours: "site.com" with referral ID
123. Gator has ID 987. When the surfer (with Gator installed on
their computer) clicks on an affiliate link on site.com to
abc.com?ID=123, Gator replaces the ID number and the visitor goes to
abc.com?ID=987.

This means that even though our affiliates were responsible for
bringing us new clients, they earned nothing and Gator earned their
commissions. Gator claimed this was simply a tracking feature of a
plug in they installed.

With the consent of my manager and VP, I froze their account due to
suspicious behavior. Justice served? Not really. Before I left the
company almost a year ago, they still had not decided a fair way to
compensate those cheated by Gator.

Anyone who is having problems with this viral program and cannot
remove it from their computer is encouraged to use Ad-Aware by
Lavasoft. They have a free version that I love and die by which can
be found here: http://www.webattack.com/get/adaware.shtml

Robert McRackan, Senior Technical Engineer
www.keywordranking.com
---------------------

Unfortunately, while it's true that users give permission for these
spyware programs to be installed, the information is often buried in
a long EULA rolled up with another program.  Many users may not even
realize that this thing is even installed, let alone what it does.
How many people do you really thing knowingly install programs to
see MORE ads (after our long heated discussion on ad blockers).

A number of programs are available that claim to cloak affiliate
links, but I can't personally vouch for any of them.

Deb Sawyers, webmaster


------- new post - new topic -------

From: George Forder
Subject: Trademark ads

> ... a Trademark doesn't give you control of the word, only
> the particular graphical representation. I believe that in
> law you can own a word only if you invent it, not if you
> adopt one from common language.
        - Ian Dickson, LED 1734

This set the brain cells going. Ownership of a word is a major
objective of most branding strategies.

I remember my mother always "hoovering" the house. We went
"windsurfing" on the weekends, and even in South Africa we "Xerox"
things although I don't think I've ever seen a Xerox machine!

Trying to muscle in on word ownership strikes me as branding
gamesmanship, a sort of desperate attempt at cheating without
getting caught.

This does show how powerful words are. "In the beginning was the
word..." I am not sure I understand what it means but it has a
powerful ring to it.

Even Voldemort in the Harry Potter series is "He that cannot (or
must not) be named" These words power is not so much in the meaning
but in the emotional connotations.

In South Africa at the moment a company, Laugh it off, have been
spoofing trademarks on tee shirts. They were relatively obscure
until "Black Labour" a spoof on Black Label beer invoked the ire of
the South African Breweries. Read about it here
http://iafrica.com/news/sa/211187.htm .

It was a good branding strategy as they are now a high profile
company, even though they spend a lot of time in court.

Playboy will turn a blind eye to the use of their words and even
possibly their trademark if it suits them. If they deem that it is
negatively affecting them, be warned... Them that cannot be named
will be after you...

George Forder

Spindrift International
www.spindrift.co.za
george [at] spindrift [dot] co.za


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Rick Meigs
Subject: Trademark ads

Business Week just published an article titled "Searching for
Trouble" that give an overview of this issue.

The subtitle was: "Keyword ads are big earners for Google, Yahoo!,
and AOL, so trademark lawsuits currently in the courts could spell
major hassles."

Here is the URL:
http://snipurl.com/42mj [businessweek.com]

Rick Meigs, President

401khelpcenter.com, LLC
www.401khelpcenter.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Steve Fleming
Subject: Ad blockers

> It is as if we need to recreate an internet that allows free web
> site submissions to search engines and doesn't allow popup ads.
        - Vip Milton, LED 1734

I love this attitude.  Everyone wants a free web, with free content,
and free search engines.  So how many people are going to provide
all this free stuff forever?

I enjoy free things on the web too, but there is room for both.
Television has "free" broadcasting with advertising and it also has
"free" stations like PBS that request donations.  Either way, it
requires money to produce.  There is also cable, ad-free, but by
subscription.  It's your choice as to what to watch.

It's the same on the web.  It's your choice as to what to watch, but
don't complain about how the site tries to pay the bills.  If you
don't like the ads, go elsewhere.  If you want the content, then
look at their ads (no one is forcing you to buy).

But don't tell me that you want to look at their content AND not see
their ads.  It's not your content.  It's theirs and they may present
it any way they wish.  Your only choice should be to either accept
it or go elsewhere.

A third alternative is that you can set up your own website and
produce your own content any way you wish.  But why someone would
think that they have a RIGHT to view someone else's content, without
seeing the way the content producer meant it to be presented is
beyond me.

Changing the way a website was originally designed to be presented
is the same as using film, music or literature and changing the way
the author originally created it.  It is intellectual property theft.

You want the content, you feel you deserve the content, but you
don't wish to pay for it.  You want your cake and eat it too!  It's
an old story. Just a new format.

Steve Fleming


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Mark Whitman
Subject: Ad blockers

> I am in the process of opening an Internet retail store.
> I intend to avoid using pop-ups for any purpose.
        - Mark Rogers, LED 1734

You can easily "throw the baby out with the bathwater" if you
condemn all pop-ups as taboo.

It's important to differentiate between the *automatic* pop-ups that
launch when entering or exiting a web page and *manual* pop-ups that
launch when the user clicks a link.

Manual pop-ups are an extremely effective tool for presenting
information in a highly focused and condensed way.

Some users (such as novices) may want additional info on a topic
when others may not need it. Providing optional information in
manual pop-up windows allows users to get additional information if
the want it. Those that don't want additional information can stay
focused on the primary body of content without having to read
through information they don't want.

Proper use of pop-ups is an excellent way of allowing users to
tailor their experience on a website to their specific needs.

Mark Whitman


==== BILLBOARD ====================================

From: Sascha Hewitt
Subject: Should local sites be hosted locally?

Hi All,

A web site designer recently told a client of mine that because his
business is based in Australia (and he only wants hits from
Australia) he should host his site in Australia - as he will do
better on the Australian search engines. I haven't heard this before
and was wondering if it is correct.

Thanks,

Sascha Hewitt


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Brad Waller
Subject: Wanted: Beta Testers for new Banner Ad Manager

Do you have banner ads on your website? If so, we want to help you
manage these banners and make you more money. We are almost ready to
launch a new service to help you simply manage banner advertising on
your site and give advertisers the ability to place ads directly
onto your site.

This grew out of my own frustration at managing our banners.
Attracting paid advertisers who made it worth my time to actually
make the insertion with a large enough order took too much time, so
I pretty much left the default banners up and sent away a number of
advertisers who wanted to pay smaller amounts of money.

This system solves all that by taking me out of the loop once it is
set up. Sites can set up default banners for when there is not a
directed buy, and we will also build up a base of default
advertising to fill in the earnings gap as well. Advertisers will be
able to visit your site and make directed buys on your pages that
can run without your intervention - optionally, you can manually
approve all advertising campaigns.

We're looking for a number of webmasters who are willing to be Beta
testers for this new service starting in the next couple of weeks.
Your only requirement is that you are willing to give us feedback on
the system and that you will use it and paste our code into some
pages on your Web sites. We're offering Beta testers a 10% bonus
over our standard revenue share.

Send me an email ( This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it - I get too much junk to
worry about hiding my email) for more information on how to
participate in this special offer.

Brad Waller, VP Affiliate & Business Development
Beta site not for public consumption...


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2004 Adam Audette. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and
quick to anger." JRR Tolkein