Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2004 archives arrow LED Digest 1738: The Web, Search Engines, and Trademark Law
LED Digest 1738: The Web, Search Engines, and Trademark Law Print E-mail
==================================================
                The LED Digest
            Moderated Discussion List
    "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

        pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
  Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
 pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                      Published by:
Adam Audette                            LED Digest
adam,led-digest.com      http://www.led-digest.com
................................................
January 29, 2004                      Issue #1738
................................................


           .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Web Ad Trademark Laws ==--

                ~ Michael Martinez
"...where the Web and search engines are concerned,
Trademark Law is taking on some unique characteristics."

                ~ Brent Duncan
"The Thunderbird car is named after...the native
American deity..."

                ~ Heikki Nylund
"[The Thunderbird] killed Killer Whale that ate the
salmon, restoring good catches..."

        --== Ad Blocking Software ==--

                ~ Tom Aman
"You *cannot* guarantee the way any Website
will appear on anyone's computer but your own."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Local Sites, Local Hosting? ==--
                ~ Jack Allison
                ~ George Forder
                ~ Nitin Agarwal


===== CONTINUING =================================

From: Michael Martinez
Subject: Trademark ads

> Can you please point me to the source of the word xerox being a
> common term prior to the company Xerox or it's products.
        - Simon McArdle, LED 1737

Please forgive me if I misinterpret your intention, but I sense an
unnecessary tangent in the making, and I wish to stay relevant to my
original point.  I hope my remarks below suffice.

> Cheery-O and Cheerios are two completely different words.

It is a pun, an intentional play on words.  However, that is beside
the point.  See below.

> What is a Thunderbird apart from a Ford car.
> Is a Thunderbird actually a bird too?

Mythologically, yes.  The name is taken from the translation of (or
English nomenclature for) a popular North American Indian motif and
mythological figure.

> Can you point me to the source of the word Middle-Earth
> that is derived from Middle English.

THE source would be Middle English.  I do not know what the oldest
citation of "Middle-earth" would be.  The Oxford English Dictionary
probably gives the fullest etymology for the term.  J.R.R. Tolkien,
who popularized the name through his novel, THE LORD OF THE RINGS,
derived it from his extensive knowledge of Middle English (one of
the subject areas in which he worked professionally).

Much of my research on Tolkien is available free of charge online,
and I will say no more about it here.  People are welcome to contact
me offlist with Tolkien-specific questions, although I have little
time for such exchanges these days.

> Xerox is an invented word.
        - Ian Dickson, LED 1737

Of course, all words are invented. However, in Xerox' case, they
once dominated the copier market to the extent that it was common
(in the United States, at least) for people to use the word "xerox"
as a verb.  It was even recorded in a number of dictionaries as both
a noun and a verb.

Xerox Corporation became so concerned for its trademark that a
multi-year, multi-million dollar campaign was launched to persuade
writes in all industries (including fiction) to stop using their
name as a verb.  They often took out full-page advertisements in
writers' magazines in the 1980s, asking writers and editors not to
use "Xerox" as a verb.

I have often noted the irony that, as their campaign increased in
persuasive success, they lost significant market share in the
photocopier market.  My belief is that they should have left well
enough alone.

However, Xerox managed to recapture control over the use of their
name (at great expense), and other companies learned from Xerox's
experience.  They initiated pre-emptive trademark protection
campaigns.  That is, they have discouraged people from using their
names as verbs.

> But the context was that of how much power does a trademark
> holder have to control the results of search engines.

The US courts have been asked to evaluate what dilutes the value of
existing trademarks in current search engine-related practices.
Some people have set up Web sites which make exclusive use of
trademarks they don't own in order to capture business.  Such sites
have been found to violate trademarks.

Some people have also set up businesses which REFER to trademarks
through their promotion, but do not make use of explicit trademarks
in their Web content.  Google won a lawsuit against Bob Massa's PR
link sales network. So, you cannot use Google's trademarked name to
create a business model which revolves around the value provided by
Google's service.

My point is that where the Web and search engines are concerned,
Trademark Law is taking on some unique characteristics.

Michael Martinez, Author

Understanding Middle-earth
http://www.xenite.org/


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Brent Duncan
Subject: Trademark ads

> What is a Thunderbird apart from a Ford car.
> Is a Thunderbird actually a bird too?
        - Simon McArdle, LED 1737

The Thunderbird car is named after -- and the logo is designed upon
-- the native American deity that translates into English as
"Thunderbird".

I have a Navajo rug that depicts the Thunderbird. Since it predates
the Thunderbird car by about 100 years, I assume that means the
deity came just a bit before the car.

Brent Duncan


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Heikki Nylund
Subject: Thunderbird

Thunderbird is a mythical creature of northwest Indians. It killed
Killer Whale that ate the salmon, restoring good catches to the
people.

Regards,

Heikki Nylund
http://www.chitarrata.com/


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Tom Aman
Subject: Ad blockers

> ... don't tell me that you want to look at their content AND not
> see their ads. It's not your content. It's theirs and they may
> present it any way they wish. Your only choice should be
> to either accept it or go elsewhere.
        - Steve Fleming, LED 1735

I will agree with that approach ONLY if you can ABSOLUTELY GUARANTEE
than NONE of the ads displayed will try to set any form of tracking
info (usually in the form of a cookie) on my computer.  It may be
their content but it is my computer that ends up with the cookie,
not theirs.

> Changing the way a website was originally designed to be
> presented is the same as using film, music or literature and
> changing the way the author originally created it. It is
> intellectual property theft.

There is no intellectual property theft involved at all.

Film is very often presented in a way that is different from the way
it was originally created.  A wide screen movie certainly requires
much different treatment to show on a TV screen. It needs to be be
reformated, and usually some scenes are even removed to fit it into
the available time.

And movies are often released in several forms on video and/or DVD
(wide screen, TV screen format, including extra scenes, director's
cut, etc.)

Music is often presented differently than the way the author
originally created it, and the older the composition, the greater
the variety of presentations available - different instruments,
different tempos, with and without lyrics, etc.

Same with literature - making a film based on a book requires a huge
change from the way the author originally created it.  But it can
all be done within the limits of the copyright - just requires the
copyright holder's permission.

As to Website presentation, I've said it before and I'll say it
again.  You CANNOT guarantee the way any Website will appear on
anyone's computer but your own.  It is the very nature of HTML.

To think you can control the exact way in which a Web page will
display shows a lack of understanding of how the Web works.
Computers differ, operating systems differ, browsers differ, browser
settings differ, monitor resolutions differ, color depths differ,
etc., etc., etc.

As long as the Website content (i.e. the TEXT) is presented in some
fashion, that is best that can be expected.  If the surfer ALLOWS
anything else (images, ads, sounds, colors, etc.) to show up on
his/her system, the Website owner should considered that to be a
bonus because the surfer controls all of that.  When you put up a
Web page, you are implicitly accepting those limitations over your
control.  That is the way the Web works.

Tom Aman

Aman Software
http://www.cyberspyder.com


==== BILLBOARD ====================================

From: Jack Allison
Subject: Local hosting

My 2 cents worth

The debate on local hosting seems to be missing an important point
when it comes to Google.

Since they have many different servers and Country URLs, a dot com
URL will not be rated so highly for the local Country search (e.g.
looking for a .com result on Google.com.au having selected "pages
from Australia" as the result filter).

So you could lose surfers that check a local results box if you
don't have a local URL.

Jack Allison

When the music stops
http://www.whenthemusicstops.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: George Forder
Subject: Local hosting

> I recently had a conversation with a South African who
> was telling me that a lot of US based ASP type sites
> were virtually unusable from South Africa because the
> international connections linking SA to the rest of the
> world are overloaded.
        - Ian Dickson, LED 1737

I am in South Africa, (but not the South African mentioned) I used
to host my sites on South African servers until I visited my sister
in the USA. It was very frustrating trying to get into the sites.

I did a little research on both-ways connectivity and now I host my
sites in Germany, which seems to have the bandwidth to meet the
world.

I'd be interested in comments.

George Forder

Spindrift International
www.spindrift.co.za


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Nitin Agarwal
Subject: Local hosting

I have been optimizing sites from 4.5 years now. I am very sure that
the sites hosted on local servers make your site more accessible
through search engines. You need to have either a local domain name
or a local hosting, if you want to be popular in a particular market.

When my client has an offer specially made for  a local market, say
"UK", I just make sure that this site is hosted in UK if I can not
have a UK based domain.

Do a search for "Rajasthan tour packages" on Google.co.uk (with
pages from UK option checked, if you are outside UK) , and you will
see www.newagetours.com in top positions just because this is hosted
on UK servers.

My 2 cents !

Warm Regards

Nitin Agarwal, Project Manager -Internet Marketing
www.ishir.com


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2004 Adam Audette. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"We are confronted with insurmountable opportunities." - Pogo