Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2004 archives arrow LED Digest 1754: Unrelated and Unsavory Links
LED Digest 1754: Unrelated and Unsavory Links Print E-mail
==================================================
                The LED Digest
            Moderated Discussion List
    "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

        pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
  Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
 pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                      Published by:
Adam Audette                            LED Digest
adam,led-digest.com      http://www.led-digest.com
................................................
February 24, 2004                      Issue #1754
................................................


           .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW ======================

        --== Unrelated, Unsavory & Unwanted Links ==--

                ~ William Ernest Waites
"I found that three links listed as being directed to
our site were from sexually explicit sites."


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Mozilla vs Internet Explorer ==--

                ~ Viggie Bala
"I would like to emphasize Mozilla is not Netscape."

                ~ Graham Brown
"I have been led to believe that Mozilla is more
compliant with CSS than IE..."

        --== AOL Bouncing Email ==--

                ~ Peter Warnock
"...residential accounts shouldn't be used for
commercial use..."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Mac Users & Mac Browsers ==--
                ~ Frank Haggard

        --== Change in PayPal Policies ==--
                ~ Simon McArdle


======= NEW ======================================

From: William Ernest Waites
Subject: Guilt by Association - Unsavory and Unwanted Linking

My Web site is an e-commerce site that sells fetish carvings by Zuni
Pueblo Indians. No these are not adult entertainment type fetishes.
They are carvings from various materials of animals and other
subjects. This carving tradition has been around for generations.
The site is www.zunilink.com.

In the Google Florida exercise, we were fortunate to rise while
others fell. In the most recent shake up we fell while others rose.
I have no problem with this as I consider it primarily an attempt by
Google to mix up the results so that the same "best results" don't
come up every time.

Out of curiosity, however, I ran a link check to see what might have
influenced the position in the results. I found that three links
listed as being directed to our site were from sexually explicit
sites. Apparently, they think all fetishes relate to their mindset.

These links are unauthorized and I would prefer to have them shut
down as they reflect poorly on us. They may even have influenced
Google's perception of what we offer.

But I don't want to contact them directly for reasons of not wanting
that garbage on my computer and I don't know how else to get the
links removed.

Three and one-half questions.

Is it possible that links from unsavory sites influence Google's
algorithm?

Is it possible to get Google not to include or consider them as
legit links when spidering and evaluating my site? How?

How else can I get these links removed without having to go to the
offending sites?

Any help will be appreciated.

William Ernest Waites

Aboriginals: Art of the First Person
http://www.zunilink.com


===== CONTINUING =================================

From: Viggie Bala
Subject: Mozilla

I would like to emphasize Mozilla is not Netscape.  Mozilla is slim,
stable and faster than Netscape.  And if you don't need, you don't
have to download the entire package.  Just the browser (Firefox)
alone can be downloaded.

Even though Mozilla foundation was established with startup support
from Netscape, Mozilla is independent.

Jerry Fetch, wrote in LED 1752,

> ... every page I visit works in IE... Even if I absolutely
> preferred one of the other browser flavors, I would
> have to keep IE at the ready...

Well, it used to be like that.  Not any more.  If you are a web
designer, you may be already familiar with www.csszengarden.com.
In fact, it's a designer's 'must see'.  Many simple features and
design tweaks do not work in IE.

I am not a Netscape fan, in fact quite the opposite due to Ver.4.7.
In those days, I'll handcode a site as compact as possible and it'll
work fine in IE, but had to add workarounds / extra codes to make it
compatible for Netscape.

Now I am re-designing my own site without tables.  This time the
compact code works fine in Mozilla, (and also Opera 7), but for IE,
I had to add extra codes, fool it by adding hack commands in CSS.
It took more than 2 hours to make it workable in IE.  Seems like the
turn of IE to behave like Netscape 4.7

Here's another thing in favour of Mozilla.  Many corporate
companies, countries were taking to Linux seriously.  In Thailand,
both Government and home market were taking to Linux in a large
scale. http://www.macobserver.com/article/2003/11/14.8.shtml

In India, all PC makers (including IBM, HP and Compaq) offer Linux
PCs in home market.  And the latest Linux versions in Home PCs were
so cute, with unbelievable sound quality, animated help, stable 3D
games and Open Office suite, it is hard not to fall for it.

More and more Corporate houses, Banks and Universities opting for
Linux.

Mozilla is the default browser in almost all Linux flavors.  And it
is available for Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, BSD, Solaris ...

IE is still the leading browser in the web, no doubt.  But it is
stagnating; in future if you need upgrade you have to go for newer
Windows OS.  I am asking about the future trends.  Whether it's time
for a change.  And if so, how soon.

Thanks & Regards,

Viggie Bala

Helping websites to work
http://www.viggie.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Graham Brown
Subject: Mozilla / IE / CSS

I have been led to believe that Mozilla is more compliant with CSS
than IE, but I really lack the skills in this area to know why the
image referred to renders as it does (or fails to render).

An excellent site that shows the power of CSS, and what can be
achieved with it is at : http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/

The site also discusses some of the rendering differences between
Mozilla and IE.  If you are not up on CSS, it is really worth a look.

Regards,

Graham Brown


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Peter Warnock
Subject: AOL bounces

> [Comcast] said they automatically bounce all email
> batches from residential accounts in excess of 100...
> I solved the problem, laboriously, by dividing by my
> list into deciles...
        - William Ernest Waite, LED 1752

Sending a list shouldn't be time consuming.  If you have the proper
list software it will create the ntiles for you.

In addition, residential accounts shouldn't be used for commercial
use; the abuse of bandwidth makes it more expensive for every
subscriber since the providers have to build more elaborate networks
to maintain the speed.

Your web and mail servers should be running in a data center. There
are plenty of affordable third-party providers; the LED Digest
promotes one daily.

Peter Warnock
Webstruction, LLC


==== BILLBOARD ====================================

From: Frank Haggard
Subject: Mac Users

As an amateur website designer I have a limited knowledge of HTML
and have been somewhat successful using programs like Frontpage and
Coolpage. Recently, I was informed by a Mac user that the links on a
Coolpage designed site did not work for them.

Upon contacting Coolpage, I was informed that "Mac users need to
adjust their browsers" and that Mac users only represent about 1% of
those using the Internet.

Needless to say, I was not very satisfied by that answer nor were my
clients. Because this does effect my costumer service issues I began
to look for a solution on my own and found some references to
"fixes" that can be imbedded in the HTML of the pages, but after
reading all the variations I became a little overwhelmed.

Does anyone have a simpler solution for this issue?

Thanks for your replies.

Frank Haggard
HHFe Technology - Energy Enhancement Systems
admin [at] frankhaggard [dot] com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Simon McArdle
Subject: PayPal

> It would be nice to know, seeing as you are talking globally
> about services, when you intend opening up PayPal shops
> again for non US businesses.
        - Simon McArdle, LED 1752

> I think they already accept foreign shops, I just found a Dutch
> site (although in English) via the Paypal shops section.
        - Carolien Ruiter, LED 1753

Yes... they do have foreign shops in there.  They closed the door
though and do not allow foreign businesses to add themselves to the
shops anymore.

I am in the shops myself but I can no longer edit my settings
because of this lockout that Paypal has done with it's foreign
clients.

That is why I asked the question when would it be opened up to
foreign businesses.

Regards,

Simon McArdle


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2004 Adam Audette. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"The best proof of love is trust." - Joyce Brothers