Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2004 archives arrow LED Digest 1770: Plugging Away at DMOZ & Local Search Doubts
LED Digest 1770: Plugging Away at DMOZ & Local Search Doubts Print E-mail
==================================================
                The LED Digest
            Moderated Discussion List
    "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

        pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
  Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
 pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                      Published by:
Adam Audette                            LED Digest
adam,led-digest.com      http://www.led-digest.com
................................................
March 22, 2004                         Issue #1770
................................................


           .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== CONTINUING =================

        <Moderator Comment>
                ~ I'm outa' here...

        --== The Local Search Buzz ==--

                ~ Ian Dickson
"Local Search is something that will be
a very hard sell..."

                ~ Jim Berry
"This isn't meant as a slight to David, but...it
strikes us as an effort in futility."

        --== Stand-Alone Optimized Pages ==--

                ~ Beth Ann Earle
"It's a matter of constant vigilance and education."

        --== All About DMOZ ==--

                ~ Peggy Deras
"[DMOZ editors] like me, just keep plugging away
as we have the time."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== My Affiliates Outdoing Me? ==--
                ~ Steven Rothberg

        --== Trademark Use Guidelines ==--
                ~ Ian Dickson


===== CONTINUING =================================

<Moderator Comment>

So... I lied! In Friday's issue I said that we'd have a short week
at the LED with issues just Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. I'm going
to have to change that as I can't guarantee I'll have Internet
access at all this week, so this may be the week's only issue. I
know you'll miss your trusty LED, but you'll live! :-) and we'll be
back in action Monday the 29th.

Until then, I'm Alaska bound!

Best wishes,
Adam

------------------------

From: Ian Dickson
Subject: Local search

Local Search is something that will be a very hard sell as a "thing
you do special". It will work when it is part of something else that
is part of your life.

Local search into it's own when there are real local community sites
- local community sites that are used by the community to
communicate with each other, not just a place where few tacky
brochureware pages for the local Pizza place sit around a deathly
silent web forum...

For information - we don't do local search, but we do have a
platform for local community, and if anyone knows anyone who fancies
being a local entrepreneur and building a local community (as a
business -  a people business not a tech one), we're open to giving
a licence or two away by way of experiment. (If we are right, and
they make it work, it's highly franchisable....)

For David Yancy - in the UK and most of Europe think in terms of 80%
of customers within 5 miles for businesses with a local model. (A 50
mile circle here is a regional one).

I'd guess that this would apply even in the US urban areas.

Cheers

Ian Dickson
http://www.commkit.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Jim Berry
Subject: Local search

Re Google's Local Search

> As they say, "Imitation is the highest form of flattery"...
> A few hours ago, Google began Beta-testing their latest
> attempt at "local search" (http://local.google.com)...
> Google have essentially copied our search interface
> (vivante.com).
        - David Yancey, LED 1768

We missed the reference in the Google news to the Vivante resource
for Google's new search feature... but we're excited to read the
first release!

Additionally, nice plug from Adam on Vivante, and good for you
David!  We commend anyone for trying to tackle an 800 lb Gorilla (or
two) in the local search engine wars, so David Yancey certainly
earns stars for his determination, but as Simon Cowell would likely
say: "David, I just don't see it as the next American Idol".

This isn't meant as a slight to David, but more to the
insurmountable odds faced when trying to unseat any of the "big
three".  It strikes us as an effort in futility.

Assuming for a moment that Vivante IS the 'discovery of fire' as the
press is suddenly calling "local search", the nagging question
remains:  Just how do you bring yet ANOTHER search engine into the
mix and have any hope of grabbing even a miniscule amount of
business to make it worth the effort?

Short of spending millions on a Super Bowl ad to announce that it
exists, how does David plan to market Vivante so it becomes the
search engine of choice for locals?  We keep expecting to see the
VivanteBot in our web logs.  (yes, we know it's paid inclusion)

Our comments are presented in the spirit of competition, and
admittedly a bit of wonder, as our Directory has been successfully
providing local search results for the Accounting, Tax and
Bookkeeping profession for 3 years now, and we never thought it any
great discovery - only a logical approach for logical people.

Jim Berry, Director of Sales & Marketing
www.bookkeepinghelp.com
jim [at] bookkeepinghelp.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Beth Ann Earle
Subject: Stand alones

> ... with reference to Beth Earle's comments [issue 1768] about
> stand-alone, optimized sites: What she is describing are not
> "doorway pages", but mini-sites. The two are radically different.
        - Tom Anson, LED 1769

Thanks, Tom, for your candid feedback.

We don't feel that they're doorway pages, either, but with the
descriptions that some people use for doorway pages, I always have
the fear that a partially educated client or prospect will form the
wrong opinion about who we are and what we do. It's a matter of
constant vigilance and education.

Beth Ann Earle


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Peggy Deras
Subject: DMOZ

> I suspect that DMOZ is going to kill itself off. I've submitted
> numerous excellent sites for both myself, and for my clients,
> and have only ONCE received a single, standard rejection
> notice. (Without any explanations.)
        - Marty Millette, LED 1769

As a DMOZ editor of a small sub-category I can tell you that I have
responded (helpfully I hope) to any email I have received from a
submitter.

I also regularly send explanatory emails, whenever I reject a
submission, with instructions and suggestions on how to correct the
deficiencies and get approved on the next submission.

The negatives, for me, are when submitters are arrogant and pushy,
believing approval is their right rather than a privilege they must
earn with good content for the public.

I became an editor a couple of years ago because there was no editor
in my category and I wanted my own submission listed. It took a
while before my application came to the top and I was approved.
That's because the applications have to wait for another volunteer
to have time to review them.

I now log on occasionally and run down the list of applications and
try to get them all approved, rejected or redirected to the correct
category.

This, however, is NOT my day job.

I continue because I am devoted to the concept of CONTENT on the
web, and there is nobody else to do it.

I can tell you this: I have learned more about what makes a good web
site from my work as a DMOZ editor that anywhere else, except maybe
this forum.

So, if you want DMOZ to continue its great work... volunteer and
give a few hours to improving it, instead of criticizing from the
outside.. DMOZ is run entirely by volunteers and they are
overwhelmed by the exponential growth of the web.

But they, like me, just keep plugging away as we have the time.

DMOZ editor:  http://snipurl.com/57cz [dmoz.org]

Peggy Deras, CKD, CID

Kitchen Artworks
www.kitchenartworks.com


==== BILLBOARD ====================================

From: Steven Rothberg
Subject: Affiliates

> The # 4 listing in Yahoo under the search term "belt buckle knife"
> (without the qoutes) is an affiliate link to my site... How in the
> world would an affiliate link get into their search results...?
        - Phil Weaver, LED 1769

It always baffles me why merchants are so concerned when their
affiliates succeed in obtaining high rankings in search engines. I
suppose those merchants are often the same business owners who are
concerned when they realize that they don't pay themselves as much
as they pay their top salespeople.

People, it is a good thing to pay your salespeople more than you pay
yourselves.

Salespeople only make a lot of money when they sell a lot. When they
sell a lot, you make more money than you otherwise would have. Don't
be jealous and try to find ways to knock them down, as your actions
will only take you down with them. Instead, be thrilled when you are
able to pay your salespeople more than you pay yourself.

It doesn't mean that you're earning less, it just means that they're
expanding the size of your pie. Although you're getting a smaller
percentage of the pie, you're getting a bigger piece than you would
have.

Our college job board went live in 1996 and we launched our first
affiliate program in 1998. I said it then, I've said it hundreds of
times since, and I'll say it again today: top affiliates are
salespeople and not only deserve to be treated as such, but
merchants should want to treat them as such.

Take care of them and they'll take care of your bottom line. And
isn't that the name of the game?

Steven Rothberg
http://www.collegerecruiter.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Ian Dickson
Subject: Trademark use

> Does anyone have a good reference on how a trademark may,
> or may not be used on a web site? Anyone have any good guidelines?
        - Marty R. Milette, LED 1769

Trademark owners are free to threaten actions that they might lose
because most people don't want to fight.

This raises the question of WHO to threaten. The answer is the
person who can give you victory with the least amount of effort.

It is common for people to threaten hosting companies with lots of
things because they know that the hosting company wants a quiet life
- so a letter to a hosting company can result in the removal of your
site simply because the hosting company doesn't want the aggro and
deems your business not worth the fight.

This does not prevent you attaching your own server to the Net of
course. If you do that then the plaintiff has to decide to take you
on in the courts, or back off.

Google (I think) recently had an issue on this re a link, and they
removed a link, but replaced it with a link to a document that
explained why the link had been removed, and IIRC because the
document was a legal one Google were entirely within their rights.
So in that case the plaintiffs victory was Pyrrhic.

Ian Dickson
http://www.commkit.com


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2004 Adam Audette. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"In terms of wilderness preservation, Alaska is the last frontier."
- Morris Udall