Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2004 archives arrow LED Digest 1810: UK Services Lagging Behind US?
LED Digest 1810: UK Services Lagging Behind US? Print E-mail
==================================================
                The LED Digest
            Moderated Discussion List
    "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

        pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
  Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
 pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                      Published by:
Adam Audette                            LED Digest
adam,led-digest.com      http://www.led-digest.com
................................................
May 26, 2004                           Issue #1810
................................................


           .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Third Tier PPC Providers - Worth It? ==--

                ~ Marty R. Milette
"...contact owners of 'complimentary' web sites
and work out a private PPC deal..."

        --== To PayPal or not to PayPal ==--

                ~ Stephen Hunt
"...us poor British clients find the [Paypal services]
lag well behind the...U.S. mothership."

                ~ Ronni Rhodes
"We have used PayPal for years and have
never - ever - had a problem..."

                ~ Richard Stubbings
"...using Paypal is seen as 'cheap' 'not professional'
and potentially even 'unsafe'..."

                ~ Emanuel D. Errico III
"...no one has mentioned the merchants that have
been abused and robbed by Paypal. I was one of them."

        --== Credible SEOs and SEMs ==--

                ~ Michael Linehan
"I had signed a percentage agreement with one
company..."

                ~ Shari Thurow
"...designers and copywriters need to understand
search and incorporate those skills..."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Outbound Links Increasing Rankings ==--
                ~ Michael Martinez

        --== Experiences with BizRate.com ==--
                ~ Lanell Grant


===== CONTINUING =================================

From: Marty R. Milette
Subject: 3rd tier PPC

> While the Pay Per Click advertisement market is dominated by
> Google and Overture, there are a number of smaller providers out
> there and I was wondering if it is worth spending money on them.
        - Abu Haider, LED 1808

Another PPC option that hasn't been mentioned here but that could be
extremely effective would be to simply contact owners of
'complimentary' web sites and work out a private PPC deal with them
directly. Most webmasters who aren't already in 'the game' would be
tickled pink to have even a small source of regular revenue.

The trick here would be to first find the appropriate sites and
contact them with your offer. Then, to set up a 'shared' tracking
system that everyone will trust. (Unique IP detection, etc.)

It seems to me that this would be a win-win-win situation because
the vendor would receive more targetted traffic from the
complimentary site, they could pay less than what they pay for
'untargetted' (generic) PPC and the webmaster would probably earn
more (100% of the fee instead of 30% to 50%) and have higher paid
clickthrough rates.

Another side benefit would be that if you host the tracking system
on your site, every time you work a deal for a private PPC
placement, you'd get another link back to your site.

Technically, this would be exceptionally easy to implement. For
example, the free .NET script "AdMentor.NET" already has almost
everything necessary to manage such a system already built in. Just
a little extra .NET programming could bring it up to 100% in no time
at all. (UNIX solutions abound also, but I don't know of any to
personally suggest.)

Marty R. Milette
http://www.custom-toolbars.com
marty, milette.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Stephen Hunt
Subject: PayPal or CC

Dave McClure from PayPal commented [issue 1809] that:

> PayPal no longer requires buyers to signup for PayPal to complete
> their transaction.  We now offer an optional signup to buyers,
> *after* they make their purchase - aka 'PayPal Account Optional'.

He forgot to mention, as does the PayPal.com web site, however, that
this functionality has only - so far - been applied to PayPal's
US-based merchant customers.

All the UK merchants who use PayPal were moved into a UK-specific
scheme late last year as (quoting from the UK site):

--------------------
"PayPal UK is the company's first international website and part of
its broader plan to expand the service in Europe. On September 16
(2003), PayPal announced the establishment of its new European
headquarters in Dublin, Ireland. The Dublin headquarters provides
customer service, fraud prevention and operational support for
PayPal members in the UK and other European countries."
--------------------

As is so often the case, us poor British clients then find the,
ahem, 'expanded service', lags well behind the full functionality of
the U.S. mothership.

I do love PayPal as a payment system, but rather resent having to
wait what can often be many months to years to compete on an equal
footing with competitors using exactly the same service, but who
have the good fortune to be born the other side of the 'ol big pond.

There's a customer quote on the PayPal.com home page advertising the
new streamlined payment system in which the client boasts he has
doubled his transaction volume since using the new 'PayPal Account
Optional' service. Reversing the logic, presumably every day PayPal
lag from offering this to their non-U.S. customers, they're also
preventing us from doubling our order volumes?

I'm put in mind of a mischievous rhyme commenting on how the
complete design for Sir Frank Whittle's jet engine were passed by
the UK to the USA 100% patent-free during World War II (handing the
USA domination of the post-war air industry on a plate). A 'special
relationship' which still seems to carry on to today ....

"God made the bees
Bees make the honey
British do the work
USA makes the money"

Ho hum.

Stephen Hunt
www.stephenhunt.net


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Ronni Rhodes
Subject: PayPal or CC

We have used PayPal for years and have never - ever - had a problem
using the interface or receiving our monies in a timely manner.
PayPal's new policies make it even easier for people to pay via
credit card.

For a small business that doesn't handle consumer goods - like ours
- PayPal is a cost effective and convenient way for us to offer a
"credit card" option to our clients.

Best regards,

Ronni Rhodes

Ignite Your Site with Sound and Motion!
http://www.wbcimaging.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Richard Stubbings
Subject: PayPal or CC

I have recently tried to use Paypal as a customer when purchasing a
webcam. After half an hour wasted on the checkout I gave up and
moved on to another site which used another payment processor. I now
actively avoid any shop that uses Paypal.

I have found that although eBay are happy to take money from my
credit card, Paypal will NOT as it 'fails some of their checks'. Nor
will Paypal let me set up a second account which would have all the
correct details as they will not allow the same credit card on two
accounts. (For the curious ones amongst you my eBay account uses one
address which is not the registered address of the credit card).

I also feel that using Paypal is seen as 'cheap' 'not professional'
and potentially even 'unsafe' by many potential customers. I feel it
is worth going that extra inch and get a proper merchant account and
proper secure service and show your customers that you are a
respectable professional organisation.

Although the set up costs are more, the percentage charge is much
less than Paypal, and thus if you are a serious business and take
sufficient orders it works out much cheaper than Paypal.

Richard Stubbings

Kulture Shock
http://www.kultureshock.co.uk


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Emanuel D. Errico III
Subject: PayPal or CC

I can't believe that after discussing Paypal for days and days on
this board, that no one has mentioned the thousands of merchants
that have been abused and robbed by Paypal. I was one of them.

Please make sure you read www.paypalwarning.com before you decide to
give them any of your business, and ask yourself, "Can my business
afford to have it's paypal account arbitrarily seized and continue
as an on-going operation?"

Thank you,

Emanuel D. Errico III

STFB Inc.
http://www.stfb.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Michael Linehan
Subject: Percentage deals for SEOs

> ... will [the SEO] sign a contract whose only payment
> will be a percentage of your increased profits?
        - Bill Davison, LED 1807

As an SEO, development, design and marketing company, I won't -
unless I am very confident about the company's ability to convert
prospects to sales.

I had signed a percentage agreement with one company. Anyone asking
for a quote had to fill out an extensive form, so they were
definitely good prospects. Out of about $1,000,000 per year over
three years of such good prospects, the company made a few thousand
dollars of sales.

I recontacted one high-end resort because they were also a possible
client for a web site.  The manager told me that they bought in
Japan (a $100,000 contract) because no-one had followed up with
them. I won't tell you how much commission I lost on that, just that
I felt sick!

Michael Linehan
www.marketing-alchemy.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Shari Thurow
Subject: Credible SEOs

Hi all-

This is in response to Steve Pronger's post in LED #1809. In his
post he stated:

> Surely an SEO's task is to increase traffic to your site for
> targeted keywords, not to convert that traffic to sales. That's
> the job of your copywriter / web designer.

Here's the deal.  The copy and the Web site design affects search
engine visibility. And it affects conversions.  So I disagree with
Steve. Part of an SEO's job is to help a site with conversions, not
just to rank and drive traffic.

Please note that I said SEO, not SEM.  Optimization is not
advertising.

In fact, I feel one of the reasons that the SEM industry is
inundated with spammers is the attitude of, "I made a page rank
well. Now my job is over." I can do that with a bunch of doorway
pages and IP delivery.

The really hard part is to develop a Web site that is both user
friendly and search friendly.  My definition of an effective Web
site is a user-friendly, search-friendly, and persuasive site that
converts.  Since many developers are still pretty clueless on how to
develop search-friendly sites, that leaves a wide-open niche which
both ethical and unethical SEMs are happy to fill.

I figured I've been in the minority for the following statements. I
feel Web designers and copywriters need to understand search and
incorporate those skills as a standard service.  I don't only mean
optimizing for Google search (or whatever your preferred search
engine is.) Search is not just about being found in Google. It's
about making your products / services / info easy to find after
people arrive at your site, too.

Even after 8 years of being an SEO, I am still amazed that designers
still don't get that.

Best wishes,

Shari Thurow, Webmaster/Marketing Director

~ Search Engine Visibility book now available
http://www.searchenginesbook.com/


==== BILLBOARD ====================================

From: Michael Martinez
Subject: Outbound links

> After doing linking campaigns for a couple of clients, I noticed
> that pagerank seemed to increase as soon as I put outbound
> links on the site, long before any number of links could be
> reciprocated.

> This is contrary to how Google's descriptions, and all
> of the "expert" opinion that you read... But I saw it.
        - Dave Roberts, LED 1808

> Whilst I do not disagree with your findings it is impossible
> to evaluate your results based just on what you saw.
        - Simon McArdle, LED 1809

I have been pointing this out for years, folks.  But don't take my
word for it.  Listen to Google:

------------------------
http://snipurl.com/6o9r  [news.com]

"Q: Some computer scientists suspect that PageRank is dead, because
Internet marketers have managed to exploit it by creating false
popularity for their sites. Is that true? Has it been altered, or is
it playing less of a role?

"A: The point of view that PageRank is dead is kind of a very static
view of the world. It will always continue to be a part of our
ranking scheme but, over time, as we develop new ideas on how to do
ranking, as we tweak existing ideas, as we think about new ways to
have them play together--the role of any one of the techniques that
we use will obviously change.

"Q: Are there any other algorithm techniques that you are using that
are playing a bigger role?

"A: Well, there are certainly other techniques that we are using.
Talking about it is the trickier part. In broad terms, techniques we
use fall into, like, two or three categories, and one is we try to
understand and leverage human intelligence. We look for signals that
people put in to indicate intelligence, like deciding to link from
one page to another or annotating text with the description of what
the text is about."
------------------------

Outbound links work for two reasons with Google:

First, as you are adding them, you are creating new content.

Secondly, as you increase your ratio of unreciprocated outbound
links to reciprocated, your site becomes more authoritative.

Google will always look for those inbound links, but they aren't
being as easily manipulated by the reciprocal links as many of you
continue to believe.  You are creating more work for yourselves in
the long run, and wasting a lot of other Webmasters' time, in the
search for reciprocation.

Google wants NATURAL link relationships.  Not artificial ones.

Michael Martinez
http://www.michael-martinez.com/


------- new post - new topic --------

From: Lanell Grant
Subject: BizRate

> Recently ran across a service call BizRate.com. I was wondering
> if anyone has had any good / bad experiences with them?
        - Mark Roberts, LED 1809

Mark,

We began the process with BizRate about early March. I believe our
timing was unfortunate as BizRate changed their "feed"
specifications three different times over the next 75 days or so. We
submitted our initial product feed four or five times before our
data format was finally accepted. We had no such problems with
Shopping, a similar competing operation.

Apart from changes in field order and what fields data must be
provided for, our greatest single difficulty was with the tab
delimited format utilized by all these folks. They say, "...simply
use Excel and save in the tab delimited format". We found that to be
TOTALLY unreliable in an environment where one extra "tab" means
trouble.

EditPad Pro came to our rescue as a text editor that makes the
miserable non visible "tab", visible, so that these feeds can be
visually verified before submitting. Why this primitive format
continues today remains a mystery ?

We create in Excel and line by line clean up in EditPad Pro. Note:
We always find extra "tab" characters.

Our traffic has been poor. I suspect that as "newbees" to this form
of marketing we have much to learn. In general the search
capabilities these little "engines" provide is rather weak. We
notice an inability to deal with fraction expressions and more
complex product descriptions, but then perhaps we are spoiled by
Yahoo, Google, et all.

We are experimenting with one product group, earrings, at this time.
I don't think we will add additional product until we better
understand the game...

Good Luck to you,

Lanell Grant
www.ediamondco.com


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2004 Adam Audette. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled."
- Plutarch