Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2004 archives arrow LED Digest 1843: Focusing on the Big Picture
LED Digest 1843: Focusing on the Big Picture Print E-mail
==================================================
                The LED Digest
            Moderated Discussion List
    "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

        pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
  Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
 pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                      Published by:
Adam Audette                            LED Digest
adam,led-digest.com      http://www.led-digest.com
................................................
July 20, 2004                          Issue #1843
................................................


           .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Site Redesign Blues ==--

                ~ Peter D'Aprix
"...the focus of the discussion is on the tools
rather than the goal of the site."

                ~ David Mead
"...only practice and lots of reading will improve
your pages."

        --== The End of Email as You Know It? ==--

                ~ Haakon Rian Ueland
"...ask your ISP to set up greylisting."

                ~ Michael Linehan
"You might find it useful to try stopping the spam
at its sources."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Cached Pages ==--
                ~ Thom Reece
                ~ Stephen Mareches
                ~ Michael Linehan

        --== Search Engine Relationship Chart ==--
                ~ Bruce M. Clay

        --== Random Spam Email ==--
                ~ Viggie Bala


===== CONTINUING =================================

From: Peter D'Aprix
Subject: Redesign blues

This is an interesting topic, most especially, I think, because it
illustrates a proclivity current in the web design field - a
tendency to focus on the details before defining the big picture.
Rather like a photographer saying he always uses a 35mm camera
instead of asking himself / herself "what camera / film combination
is right for this assignment?"

In this case, the focus of the discussion is on the tools rather
than the goal of the site. While tools are certainly important, a
carpenter will first decide what he needs to build, then pick the
tools and materials relevant to producing the desired product. The
same should be true of web sites. Once the goal is decided, then the
best tool to achieve it can be picked. Not the other way around.

The debate between FrontPage, GoLive, Dreamweaver and other wisiwig
tools versus hand coding seems to me to be missing the point. Any
one of the wisiwig tools, if used in capable hands, despite all
their drawbacks, will produce sites that load reasonably quickly,
especially if broad band is being used by the viewer. Most of them,
the best ones anyway, provide a self coding feature which on the
most recent versions is better than on older versions. If used
correctly, search engines will spider sites produced by them all.

And, conversely, there is nothing wrong with hand coding, again when
used by capable hands. There is nothing to suggest that a site built
using hand coding is going to be a better or worse site than one
built using a wisiwig tool since it depends entirely on the ability
of the designer to use the tools well.

And is it not the ultimate user of the site, not the designer of the
site, for whom sites are intended? So frankly, who cares how the
site is built? Who cares what tools are used if the visitors to the
site like it, return to it, find it loads quickly and gives them
what they want in a manner in which they can find it easily and the
information fulfills their needs? If the search engines are happy
enough with the site to index it and it appears well placed on a
search. Certainly this last is not the province of hand coded sites
exclusively.

So just as a site should be graphically designed with the product,
the message and the user in mind, not to mention the client; so
should the choice of tools.

Having said that, it is most useful for a wisiwig designer to at
least be familiar with the code. In addition to the dummy book
mentioned, www.lynda.com has an excellent group of books to help
with many web applications. Her "Creative html Design 2" is a very
good place for anyone starting html or currently using a wisiwig
(what you see is what you get) application.
http://www.htmlbook.com/

I am a current user of Adobe GoLive simply because I started with
very first version of it and I took Lynda Weinman's class in Ojai
which partnered Adobe PhotoShop with Adobe GoLive since they work
well together and I have been a long time user of PhotoShop as a
professional photographer for 25 years.

But GoLive has not kept up with Dreamweaver and I am going to
switch, so have been exploring Lynda's web site for the appropriate
instruction book to bring me up to speed. Same goal for the web site
but different tools to achieve the goal.

Lastly and I will give you all a break from my pontificating,
different craftsmen feel comfortable with different tools. Here
again, who cares what tools you use as long as you and your tool kit
achieve the desired result.

So a discussion of tools must rest on how well suited they are to
the desired result and to the user. The desired result should first
be defined before the resulting discussion can have much relevance.

Peter D'Aprix
peter, daprix.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: David Mead
Subject: Redesign blues

"HTML for Dummies" is an excellent book (still have my dog-eared
copy) and FrontPage is a great tool for the novice home-user.  But
skimming through both of these in a weekend does not make you a web
designer.

Do you know about DOCTYPES and how they affect different browsers?
Does your code validate?  Is your content lost below a ton of
propriety tags, JavaScript and nested tables?  Is it HTML or XHTML?

Use the afore-mentioned items to get a basic understanding, but only
practice and lots of reading will improve your pages.

David Mead


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Haakon Rian Ueland
Subject: End of Email

There are a few options you might try.

The most efficient one is to ask your ISP to set up greylisting.
This system, which works serverside, sends a message back to the
mails originating server saying it did not receive the mail.
Typically, spammers hide the originating servers.

A disadvantage to this system is that the first mail sent will take
about 1 hour to reach you. However, once you have received one mail,
you will not have to wait.

Greylisting is free for Linux servers, and is a standard plugin.

Another option is to search for "spam" one www.sourceforge.net and
www.freshmeat.net. There are many free apps to be found.

Haakon Rian Ueland
http://www.i-q.com


------- new post - same topic --------

From: Michael Linehan
Subject: spam frequency

> My spam has now got silly with over
> 2,000 messages a day.
        - Richard Graham, LED 1842

Hi Richard,

You might find it useful to try stopping the spam at its sources.
One major source for anyone is the web site. The email address
"forms, genkienglish.net" is plainly visible in the code of your
contact form. If I can see it, so can the spam harvesters.

If this were held in a CGI script, it would not be gathered by
spammer robot. Or you could try plain email links, encoded to
prevent harvesting.

Michael Linehan
http://www.marketing-alchemy.com


==== BILLBOARD ====================================

From: Thom Reece
Subject: Cached pages

> How can I make sure that a browser ALWAYS pulls the
> recent web page from my server as opposed to pulling
> a cached page from the local machine?
        - Steve Wicks, LED 1842

Aloha...

I believe that if you hold down the 'Shift' key at the same time you
click on 'refresh' you will force the the data to be taken from the
server and bypass any cached pages.

Thom Reece

On-Line Marketing Resource Center
http://www.e-comprofits.com


------- new post - same topic --------

From: Stephen Mareches
Subject: Cached pages

Steve,

The best thing I've found so far is to use these two lines in the
"head" portion of your page:

<.http-equiv name="Pragma" content="No Cache">
<.http-equiv name="Expires" content="-1">

This lets your visitors browser know to not use a cached page on
their machine older than yesterday.

If your content changes frequently you may wish to also include
<.http-equiv name="Revisit" content="2 weeks">

These little guys can be especially helpful in presenting your
freshest content.

Stephen Mareches, Web Consultant

Sophia Solutions
www.sophiasolutions.net


------- new post - same topic --------

From: Michael Linehan
Subject: Cached pages

<.meta name="robots" content="noarchive">
<.meta name="googlebot" content="noarchive">

Hopefully, someone else knows what to do about pages already there.

Michael Linehan
http://www.marketing-alchemy.com


------- new post - new topic --------

From: Bruce M. Clay
Subject: Search Engine Relationship Chart

Since so many of you already have this chart, I thought it okay to
announce that the update is available. Free, of course.

FLASH: http://www.bruceclay.com/searchenginerelationshipchart.htm

PDF: http://www.bruceclay.com/searchenginechart.pdf

Click on the icons for backup data. Comments always welcome.

Bruce Clay
www.bruceclay.com

<Moderator Comment>

Congrats on the Wired article, Bruce!


------- new post - new topic --------

From: Viggie Bala
Subject: Random email

> I have been receiving spam emails that have strange strings
> of words at the beginning and/or ending of the email.
        - Diane Dennis, LED 1839

You will not see these strange strings of words if you are using
Outlook.  Instead, the HTML part of the email will be displayed.  So
while they fool the filters with this text, they still show their
ads the same way for most of the recipients.

I have now resigned to checking mails in web browser before
downloading in my Outlook.  I do have anti-virus protection, but
this way I can delete all virus mails before it lands in my PC.
Even now, 5 - 10 virus email arrives in a day.  While checking the
subject and file size in browser, it is easy to delete all obvious
spam.  This manual filtering is a bit tedious, but I am not taking
chances after two hard disk crashes with vital data loss.

Regards,

Viggie Bala

Viggie  - Helping websites to work
http://www.viggie.com


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2004 Adam Audette. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Adversity is the first path to truth." - George Gordon Byron