Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2003 archives arrow LED Digest 1508: Site Search Tools
LED Digest 1508: Site Search Tools Print E-mail
==================================================
                The LED Digest
            Moderated Discussion List
    "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"
==================================================
List Moderator:                    Published by:
Adam Audette                        LED Digest
.................................................
January 31, 2003                      Issue #1508
.................................................


           .....IN THIS DIGEST.....

==== CONTINUING =================

        -=File Names Affecting Rankings?=-
                ~ Joann Chokrach
                ~ Derek Andrews
                ~ John Smart

        -=Darwin and the World Wide Web=-
                ~ Eric Martin
                ~ Brian Douglas
                ~ Boris Poljuha

        -=Search Engine Optimization (SEO)=-
                ~ Shari Thurow


===== GEEK TIPS ==================

        -=Site Search=-
                ~ Niki Mcelroy


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        -=Internet Advertising Pricing=-
                ~ Ivan J. Jimenez
                ~ Peter Warnock


===== CONTINUING =================================

From: Joann Chokrach
Subject: File names

> The search word for all of these? "limewash". His ranking
> in Google? 24 of about 2,550... I guess this proves that file
> names and paths do affect rankings.
        - John Smart, LED 1506

John,

The reason the pictures are picked up, is because the index page
(with the thumbnails) is titled "limewash," linked from your
homepage.

Those of us who have been around for awhile, and do not make money
selling "search engine optimization tips" know that the title is the
most important part of the page for the search engines.  Not all
search engines use META tags, but they all use the title.

Joann Chokrach


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Derek Andrews
Subject: File names

John Smart has missed something. His page
http://www.fasulos.com/limewash/index.htm has a page title
'limewash'. It is almost certainly this which Google is indexing,
and it highlights this in the search results.

What I find odd is that the page has PR2 with no known pages
pointing to it. I suspect that this is a transient effect though as
this is a new site.

Derek Andrews, woodturner
http://www.sunrisewoodcrafts.ns.ca


------- new post - same topic -------

From: John Smart
Subject: File names

I appear to be guilty of seeing what I wanted to see! The bland page
title does indeed say "Limewash" - that dilutes the observation
somewhat (although it does show the importance of either folder
names OR page titles!)

As for pages linking to this one - until just a few days ago there
were none. There is a page linking now, that has sent some visitors
to the site, but the figures were compiled without including those
late numbers.

John Smart, Technical Director
InternetDesign.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Eric Martin
Subject: Darwin

> ... though there are lots of people who claim
> to have web building businesses, they just
> don't seem to be interested in handling the
> small business owner
        - Vicki Lambert, LED 1506

When you look for a web designer, look all over North America - or
even the world. Bypass local designers if they are ignoring you.

By the way, the CSS code in your pages is defeating the whole
purpose of using it. Somehow it has ballooned into a mess. This
would be simple to clean up and would help your load times and with
spiders visiting your site.

Eric Martin

Futura Studios Digital Design Center
http://www.futurastudios.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Brian Douglas
Subject: Darwin

Hello Vicki:

I just wanted to tell you that I know exactly what you are talking
about. And, on the flipside, my companies were built specifically to
help the small-to-mid-sized businesses of the world.

I spent several years working for Fortune 500 companies and one day,
decided to give it up and start my own business.  After trying to
find a company to build my web site for a reasonable price (with NO
luck!), I too gave up and decided to build my own.  I'm happy to say
now, however, that I have three small businesses of my very own.
One of which is in Marketing and Web Site Design - something I have
truly come to enjoy -- no, make that LOVE!!

At any rate, I just wanted to let you know that there are businesses
out there that are willing and able to help the "smaller"
organizations of the business community.  And, even though there are
organizations just like mine, sometimes it is still best to take
matters into your own hands.

Sincerely,

Brian Douglas
TradeShowJoe.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Boris Poljuha
Subject: Darwin

In response to Vicki;

Hmm, it seems to me that your example / experience is rather an
exception... I'd agree with the estimate that "most business owners"
are still looking at the web possibilities as at unfair competition
in terms of running a small business.

What I'd like to know in your case - first, did this happen before
or after the "bubble burst"; second, was it possibly an issue how
much you were willing to pay for this "such a small site", or if
they wanted to charge more that your budget allowed?

Boris Poljuha
www.mmxdesign.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Shari Thurow
Subject: SEO

Hi all--

> What's left is Google, and what's on the page
> isn't nearly as important as what points at the
> page. So, in the end, pages that are "user-friendly"
> and little else don't win in the engines.
        - Mike Jacobs, LED 1506

I have no idea where Mr. Jacobs gets his data, but all of the
user-friendly I work on don't have a problem with search engine
visibility.

Plus, I've worked on many sites which were formatted for usability
(Jared Spool, Jakob Nielsen, and others were the people who worked
on the sites).  And these sites don't have any problems with search
engine visibility.

Sure, I am presenting anecdotal evidence, but I honestly believe Mr.
Jacobs is contradicting himself.

Think about it.  If you want other sites to link to yours, without
cheating (i.e. link farms), your content should be outstanding and
your site should be user friendly.  Would you link to a site that
you found difficult to use?  I wouldn't.

Also, the more difficult you make it for people to purchase from
your site, the less likely you will make sales.  I have found that
hiring a usability expert is well worth the cost.

Usability and search-engine friendliness complement each other, if
done properly.  The problem is that many so-called SEO experts only
know the search engines and don't look at the big picture.  Site
design, usability, link development, sales conversions, online and
offline advertising  -- these are all related.  A good firm knows
how to integrate all of these components, and not do one at the
expense of the other.

Unfortunately, there are a lot of unethical SEOs out there.  Just
last week, we discovered a link farm of over 3 thousand domain
names. This company purchased 3,000 domain names that had expired,
and some of them had good link popularity from the previous owners.

What this spam company did was put tons and tons of keywords in all
3 thousand of these domains to try and artificially boost the
popularity component in Google and the other search engines.

This company succeeded -- for a very short time.  Want to take a
guess at the number of domains that are now blacklisted?

Be careful who you hire.

Take care,

Shari Thurow

~ Search Engine Visibility book now available
http://www.searchenginesbook.com/


===== GEEK TIPS ===================================

From: Niki Mcelroy
Subject: Site Search

I have been trying to find a good site search engine for a large web
site. I still have not found a suitable one no matter where I look
or what I try. Does any one know of one or have any suggestions?

Sincerly,

Niki Mcelroy, Editor
www.freeandfrugal.com


==== BILLBOARD ====================================

From: Ivan J. Jimenez
Subject: CPM 101

> I can see that most (if not all) think that paying
> for click throughs is the way to go, and pay-per-view
> is of no value. I have been thinking about this,
> and think it is wrong...
        - John Smart, LED 1507

John,

It sounds like you'd enjoy reading the "advertising" column on the
New York Times (I sure do!)... here's the link:
http://nytimes.com/pages/business/media/index.html

The Advertising newsletter is actually more interesting than the
daily articles : )

All the best,

ivan j. jimenez, business development
cosmicbreath.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Peter Warnock
Subject: CPM 101

Pay-per-view was initiated by traditional marketers who had yet to
harness the power of technology.  The Internet facilitates
accountability.

Ten years from now, when every television is interactive, HSN, QVC,
and every infomercial will have the same pay-for-performance
requirements as the Web.

Pay-per-view on the Web is only appropriate when the product doesn't
have a direct e-commerce channel to which it can be purchased from.

Peter Warnock
webstruction.com


-------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 1995-2003 Adam Audette. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"There is a time for many words, and there is also a time
for sleep." - Homer, The Odyssey