Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2007 archives arrow LED Digest 2318: Sketchy Forms
LED Digest 2318: Sketchy Forms Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
Hosting and Domain Registration from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
January 4, 2007                   Issue no. 2318
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW =====================

        --== Even More Form Spam ==--

                ~ John Smart
"If you have...any script that mails open
confirmation to the sender, you are at risk."


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Alt Attributes within Heading Tags ==--

                ~ Shaun Johnston
"...I tip towards not calling attention to graphics at all."

        --== Digg Hates SEO ==--

                ~ Joel Lesser
"Let them Digg their own grave."

                ~ Chris Nielsen
"I just forwarded a...personal note to all four
email contacts I found on Digg.com..."

        --== An SEO Guide - is it Possible? ==--

                ~ Adam Audette
"Check out the excellent guide at SEOmoz."

        --== The Email Crisis ==--

                ~ Will Bontrager
"A decoy is a great idea..."

        --== Simplicity is Overrated ==--

                ~ Tom Anson
"I think the question should be 'full-function,
but made to look simple and work simply'."

        --== Linking to the LED [was: New Years...] ==--

                <Moderator Comment>
"Thanks for the amazing show of support!"

                ~ Nancy Cardinali
"Sounds like a plan!"

                ~ Ron Coble
"I'm in."

                ~ Tom Aman
"[We] should let Adam know so he can give us
feedback on how well this works out."

                ~ John Smart
"...how about a nice snazzy banner?"

                ~ Lorelle Smith
"I'd be willing to volunteer my time & research skills
to find tons of suitable keyword phrases..."


========== NEW ===================================

From: John Smart
Subject: Spammers - hate them!

I got a mail from a client today -- someone was refusing his mail
because my domain had open ports leading to spam. Well, I got rid
off all those Matt's Archive cgi mailing nightmare scripts, wrote my
own form manager that is completely secure, so I was flummoxed. The
nice people blocking my mail kindly sent me a copy of one of the
mails that led to my blacklisting.

I should have seen this coming, but am amazed none the less. I wrote
a guest book script for a client 18 months ago. If you sign his
guestbook, he gets a mail showing him the content of your posting
with the ability to approve or deny it. But another copy was sent to
the poster (what was I thinking?)

So the spammers fill in the form (presumably with a script -- more
on that later) and the mail goes out -- over 27,000 of them in 18
months.

Now, I am not a complete idiot with security issues -- the script
will only allow form inputs that come from the referrer of the form
page, which means all 27,000+ spams were manually entered, or a
script integrated with a browser filled them in and sent them on.

This seems like a lot of work to me. Not that I am going to send
spam, but if I were, I would park my wireless enabled notebook near
an open network (one can be found in any neighborhood) and mail to
my hearts content -- many broadband providers require passwords for
receiving -- not for sending.  Why go to so much work? Plus it
appears that they do not test their spam attacks -- they tried to
modify the headers for the addresses, but that failed with the
coding I did think to include.

The moral? If you have, written by you or others, any script that
mails open confirmation to the sender, you are at risk. Closing this
door is fairly easy, but you need to know it is open to be able to
close it. With all my server monitoring, I am amazed that so many
were able to sneak under my noes!

John Smart
InternetDesign.com - A Human Touch in a Digital World


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Shaun Johnston
Subject: Alt attribute

On a  topic related to putting attributes around graphics, I tip
towards not calling attention to graphics at all. Visitors from the
search engines to my sites looking for images view a single page
only. They have no interest, and develop no interest, in my site,
and count as noise.

Including an alt, I believe, brings only such visitors, I doubt it
counts with the search engines otherwise, it's too open to abuse.

Shaun Johnston


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Joel Lesser
Subject: Digg

> Lately the social media giant [Digg] has come under
> attack because their primitive anti-spam system has
> banned many unspammy and highly ethical domains.
        - Moderator Comment

Don't worry about this.. Webmasters will vote with their mouse.

Let them Digg their own grave.

Best Regards,

Joel Lesser

Creative NetVentures, Inc.
http://cnvi.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Chris Nielsen
Subject: Digg

I just forwarded a copy of the current issue of LED and a personal
note to all four email contacts I found on Digg.com to let them know
their system for controlling abuse is being abused.

I was going to call them, but was disappointed to not find a phone
number on the site or the domain registration (private, no address
either).

Chris Nielsen


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Adam Audette
Subject: SEO Guide

I just wanted to offer a little encouragement / feedback to the SEO
guide idea. I like it, and I agree very much with the comments so
far. I'm willing to help in any capacity, including setting up an
editor-based section of the site where LEDers can make changes,
update content, etc. It will take a few days to set up, but once the
initial effort is done we can chip away at it over the next few
months.

Also, if you're not familiar with the excellent guide at SEOmoz,
check it out. Rand Fishkin and the gang over there do a tremendous
job. We can learn a lot from their guide and hopefully offer
something just as useful. Here it is:
http://www.seomoz.org/beginners.php

In fact, I'd love to hear what you think of the SEO guide idea after
checking out this link. Has it already been done? The factor that
could set our guide apart and make it quite useful is the idea of
"graded" or "voted" elements, such as the ideas Chris Nielsen and
Tom Anson offered yesterday.

Just kicking around a few more ideas.

Best wishes,
Adam


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: William Bontrager
Subject: Email

> How about including a bogus e-mail as part
> of the cgi-link that is only there to satisfy the
> 'bots thirst for 'at's and 'dot's,...
        - Dan McAvinchey, LED Digest 2311
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1410/55/

A decoy is a great idea, Mr. McAvinchey. I like :)

The decoy should be an address that blackholes emails rather than
bouncing them. Otherwise, the bounces would be delivered to whomever
is unfortunate enough to have their email address spoofed in the
From or Return-Path header lines.

> I use MasterFormV4, MasterFeedback, and even Master
> Spambot Buster on my own sites as well as client sites.
> [And] all scripts work as described, and are easy to
> install and implement.
        - D. Perry, LED Digest 2311

Wow. Thank you for the kudos, D. Perry. Unsolicited testimonials are
the most valued of all. (I hope you don't mind if I use your post as
an example.)

LEDers, the above is a window into the "secret" of our success -- to
deliver such good products and provide such good service that people
can't help but talk about us.

Willmaster.com serves approximately half a million page views per
month (Awstats), which I think is pretty good for a husband and wife
team. We do very little SEO, other than publishing lots of quality
content, and rarely advertise anywhere except within our own sites
and publications. The traffic is primarily the result of word of
mouth (including unsolicited and voluntary back links).

> Way to go Bontragers! (I'll put down the pom poms now)
        - Moderator Comment, LED Digest 2311

Adam, your comment means a lot to us. Thank you very much.

Let me mention a recently published "word of mouth marketing" book
that LEDers who focus on quality can certainly benefit from.

I had exchanged some emails with the author, Andy Sernovitz, some
months before the book was published, and he sent me a copy for
review. The book is so good, and mentions so many _practical_ things
one can do, I ended up devoting an ezine issue to it. You can find
the book at http://wordofmouthbook.com/book.php

Everyone, I hope you have accomplished the important goals you had
in mind for 2006. May 2007 bring you all the good you are able to
imagine might really happen.

Will Bontrager


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Tom Anson
Subject: Simplicity

I found Nathan Holley's post (LED Digest 2312) to be interesting.
He raises some good points to consider.  However, I think we need to
be careful not to lump too many different things together into a
one-size-fits-all model.

I have no doubt that a gaming website would draw a lot of traffic.
Such is the nature of the beast.  And, just as a casino with a very
plain design -- one that offers ONLY the games, no frills -- would
not do as well as one with lots of flashing lights and hyped
excitement, people who visit gaming websites are most likely trying
to replicate that experience.  Gaming is a total-package deal.

But, not all webbies are gamers.  Some approach the website of their
choice with a whole different attitude.  They are not looking for
glitz; they want a site that is approachable.  If I'm looking for
essential oils online (or a natural way to deal with a specific
health issue), I want a site that gives me the information I'm
looking for and a straight-forward way to purchase those oils.  If
my search (around a website) is distracted by bells and whistles,
I'm more likely to leave than buy.  If there is so much "clutter" on
the site that I can't tell one thing from another (see
http://essential.stemtechhealth.com as an example), I'm gone.  If I
have to try three times to make a link because of the javaScript
navigation (which is very common for me, klutz that I am), I'll just
navigate myself somewhere else.

On the other hand, text resizing is NOT non-simplistic.  It is very
basic.  It not only doesn't distract from the viewing experience, it
enhances it (unless it just randomly resizes on its own -- but I
doubt that this is what Nathan was referring to).  A flexible layout
is not -- in my opinion -- a fancy feature.  The same with tableless
designs.  They may not be simple to create, but they simplify and
enhance the visitor's experience.  And a newsletter is simple.  At
least, it should be.  And, depending on how they are handled,
graphics, photos and icons ARE simplistic -- for the user.  They can
simplify the visitor's way around the page, break up blocks of text,
giving visual clues to what is there.  RSS feeds are becoming more
customary, and certainly don't take away from the simplicity of
design.

Switching colors, however, ...

On the other hand (and I don't know if this fits with the toaster
example or not), a website that is SO simple that it looks like it
wasn't designed at all -- just stuck up there -- probably won't get
much of my business, either.  Such an "undesigned" site may be the
ultimate in simplicy, but it lacks usability as much as the site
with too much clutter.  As least for me, sites like that -- while
undeniably simple -- look cluttered.

I think, however, that there is some question about what the subject
of this discussion really is.  Nathan presents the matter more like
the question is "simple to design and build".  I think the question
should be "full-function, but made to look simple and work simply".

From what I've seen of toasters, all things being equal, I'd
probably choose the one with a few "extras" over one that offered a
one-way-fits-all approach to toasting.  However, if the fancy
toaster was covered in blinking lights, layers of labels that moved
when I tried to punch a button or a secret slot that the toast came
out of when done, I'd probably go back to my grandmother's toaster.
(Actually, I've never seen one that works any better . . . )

Tom Anson

Anson Aromatic Essentials
http://www.therapeutic-grade.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

<Moderator Comment>

Yesterday, Dan the-man-with-the-plan Rosenfield had this great idea:

> Why not give us (your subscribers) snippets of code so
> we can put text links on our sites to help you reach your
> goal?

> I suggest that you create 12 text links (assigned
> to us in accordance with our birth month).

The response to Dan's idea has been very positive and I now give you
12 variations of keyphrases for the LED site. Link to your hearts
content - they are organized by month - so pick your b-day (or
favorite month) and go wild. Thanks for the amazing show of support!
This is indeed LED power.

Here are the links.

January:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">Internet Marketing Email
List</a>

February:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">The Marketer's Email Discussion
List</a>

March:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">Email Discussion List for
Internet Marketing</a>

April:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">SEO and Design Discussion
List</a>

May:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">Email List for Ecommerce</a>

June:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">Marketing Email Discussion
Group</a>

July:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">Web Business Email Group</a>

August:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">Marketing Discussion List</a>

September:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">The List for Marketers: LED
Digest</a>

October:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">Web Marketing Email List</a>

November:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">Search, Design, and Ecommerce
Discussion List</a>

December:

<a xhref="http://www.led-digest.com/">LED Digest: The Marketer's
Discussion List</a>

----------------------
Thanks LEDer!
----------------------

From: Nancy Cardinali
Subject: Birth month links

Sounds like a plan! I have several sites I could post a link.

Nancy Cardinali


-------- next post ---------

From: Ron Coble
Subject: New Years

Adam,

I'm in.  Get your links together and send them to me, I will be glad
to post one on our web site and blog.  Your newsletter is one of the
'very' few I have not unsubscribed from over the past 5, 6 or 7
years.  Keep up the great work.

Happy New Year!

Ron Coble

Coble International Marketing Services
http://www.importexporthelp.com


-------- next post ---------

From: Tom Aman
Subject: New Years

Fantastic idea, Dan!  Only added suggestion is that any of us who
put up a link should let Adam know so he can give us feedback on how
well this works out.

Tom Aman


-------- next post ---------

From: John Smart
Subject: New Years

Sometimes a text link is not enough -- how about a nice snazzy
banner? I would offer to design a banner -- but with my art skills,
it would probably drive subscribers away!

John Smart
InternetDesign.com

<Moderator Comment>

Wish I had some banners! Here's a page with logos though:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/87/79/


-------- next post ---------

From: Lorelle Smith
Subject: New Years

Hi Adam,

I meant to write to you about your not-so-great keyword choice for
optimizing the LED site but Jill Whalen beat me to it. Side note:
Jill is the one who introduced me to Wordtracker -- and the value of
keyword research in general -- back in 2002. I've learned everything
I know about SEO from her, her High Rankings forum, and the posters
in LED.

I'd be willing to volunteer my time & research skills to find tons
of suitable keyword phrases to target for the LED site. I use both
Wordtracker and KeywordDiscovery; their search data comes from
different sources and neither one can be entirely relied upon. (I
figured out a way to merge WT & KD data, plus Overture bids, into
one spreadsheet to see all the numbers at a glance.)

The best keyword data is found by utilizing a pay-per-click (PPC)
campaign. So while waiting for the search engines to start ranking
the LED site for the target phrases, your best bet would be starting
PPC campaigns to attract new subscribers (which I assume is the end
goal), and I would be happy to help with setting those up as well.

Lorelle Smith, The Keywordsmith

Professional Keyword Research & Analysis Consultant
http://www.keywordsmith.com


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2007 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"You may delay, but time will not." - Benjamin Franklin