Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

 
Home arrow Featured Posts arrow SEO Work and Transparency
SEO Work and Transparency Print E-mail
Written by Aaron Wall
January 9, 2007

Inside Information and the SEO Industry

I think the idea of creating an SEO guide becomes unbearable only if you think you have to answer every possible question and cover every detail in every case. And at that point we are writing so much that it is outdated and most of it doesn't apply to most people. I think it is far more important to understand general trends and give tips that can be applied in various means. If this works for you then do it. If not skip it and apply whatever else fits your needs. Grab the low hanging fruit first and then reinvest those profits into improving your business in other ways.

Shaun Johnston stated...

> Real professional SEO work is to me the most unpleasant
> job I can concieve of, worse than actuarial research in an
> insurance company. Are we, in fact, working with a set of
> tools bound to induce a sense of failure? Can one conceive
> of a better set, that even creatives could enjoy using?

I think you can get a quick overview of a marketplace rather quickly for free by using something like Jim Boykin's top 10 analysis tool or something like my SEO for Firefox extension.

If you are trying to create something sustainable for organic SEO I don't think it helps to look at exact numbers and try to exactly hit any specific number, just survey the market and trends, and then do what you can to beat the competition. If you track the news better and know your market better than the competition and create and share more value than the competition then eventually the search results will show that. I think I was able to cover many of the most important points of SEO in 4 pages on a recent Work.com article.

DomainDrivers stated

> There are some big name SEO experts who claim
> to have magic formula ranking recipes that simply
> rely on a "few good links". But they won't ever tell
> you exactly where to get them, or the cost.

And the reason that you won't get told exactly where to do exactly what works at a set price is many fold:

  • every market is unique

  • we all know markets shift

  • if there is an exact known cheap formula and it is exactly shared we reduce our work to the value of commodity workers in 3rd world countries, who we soon will be competing with... as an example, I have had offers for some of my high ranking domains from people who I was almost certain were low waged and in third world countries

  • how can we justify charging our clients some rate for our work then sharing everything we did together with all their competitors?

  • the whole reason any techniques work is that few people use or abuse them relative to how often they occur as natural parts of the web. share all your tricks and secrets and all you do is push yourself toward becoming a commodity.

  • the whole reason reciprocal links diminished in value and effectiveness because the technique has been abused and is generally associated with low information quality

  • any real website with a real brand should have some intrinsic value associated with it that is not easy for competitors to duplicate

  • you can push frameworks of thinking and observed general algorithmic trends, but there is never a point in giving exact details of everything you do on one specific site unless your goal is to get media coverage for your own brand and/or that site and use THAT as a competitive advantage.

cheers,

aaron wall
http://www.seobook.com


Comments (1)add comment

Dirk Johnson said:

  Our clients continue to do well, even the ones with domains that are less than a year old. Our older clients have weathered the various Google updates in remarkable condition, even gaining positions. In addition, the sites we link with have held up well. We follow their success, too, as another means to gauge what is really happening with reciprocation.

We have seen virtually nothing in search results that has moved us to alter our approach, which has been the same for years. From our inception, we try to do this work properly, and with relevance to subject as the driving consideration. Maybe that is the difference. In any case, it works.

What's more, the vast majority of our clients (old and new) use nothing more than the very basic SEO techniques that we describe here domaindrivers.com/seobasics-realestate-main.htm and they use reciprocal linking as their primary, and in many cases, their only pro-active method of establishing links. Many of the other one-way links pointing to their sites (and they are numerous, especially among the older clients) were acquired later by natural citation, from which reciprocation was the catalyst that earned them the awareness in the first place. Reciprocal links, done right, beget one-way links.

From what we have seen, based on observing hundreds of sites and case studies, functional SEO work is not very complicated, or costly. It just takes some basic knowledge of what works, the willingness to do it thoroughly, and some time. To clarify, it is not free, or easy.

I don't disagree that hiring real experts to prosecute the minutiae details of SEO, or to pursue links that are not readily available, can be very effective, especially in extremely competitive situations. But the average site owner that we encounter does not have the budget for that kind of higher-end advice. So there is a lot that they can do on their own, or in consultation with a good, grounded advisor, that costs very little, and produces excellent results. A part of that basic approach includes proper reciprocation with other relevant sites, which is a very affordable strategy in the whole context of link building.

Website owners on real budgets looking for practical answers need to hear that message, from someone who observes it first hand, every day.
January 11, 2007 | url

Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy