Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2007 archives arrow LED Digest 2324: Design Elements vs Business Decisions
LED Digest 2324: Design Elements vs Business Decisions Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
Hosting and Domain Registration from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
January 12, 2007                   Issue no. 2324
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== CONTINUING =================

        <Moderator Comment>

        --== Saving Design Costs ==--

                ~ Lynne Diamond
"Who knows better? The business owner
or the web designer?"

                ~ Jill Whalen
"Unfortunately, it seems to be a huge
problem inherent in website design."

                ~ Bob Cavanagh
"We have recently used a web design
company to redesign our site..."

                ~ Jere Matlock
"We generally specify a clause in our
design proposal..."

        --== Image Spam the Future? ==--

                ~ Veronica Yuill
"I'd like to know what on earth ISPs are
doing about it."

        ---== What is Yahoo! Slurp Doing? ==--

                ~ Will Bontrager
"Feature request for SE spiders: Provide a referrer."

        --== An SEO Guide - is it Possible? ==--

                ~ Shari Thurow
"...I don't think there are enough true experts on
the LED to come up with a really good SEO guide."


======== CONTINUING ===============================

<Moderator Comment>

Huge response to Shari Thurow's post regarding clients and design
costs. I'll put together a special issue for Monday. I've also
published a selection of comments here:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1708/172/

Have a great weekend,
Adam

PS - the iPhone that I lust after appears to already be trademarked:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/10/tech/main2349900.shtml

----------------

From: Lynne Diamond
Subject: Design costs

> What do you do when people insist on too many
> renditions of design elements, making the project
> launch date later than expected, and going over budget?
        - Shari Thurow, LED Digest 2323
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1707/55/

I am so glad you posted to this topic because I was thinking of
posting on it myself.  I am a client so I might be able to offer the
other point of view.

I am a divorce mediator and paralegal with an online Calfornia
divorce site.  The site went live in 1997.  It is a large site with
a lot of content and an e-commerce section.  My previous designer /
programmer of 9 years left a lot of his "fingerprints" on the site
making it very difficult for someone else to step in - particularly
in the cgi coded ecommerce pages.  He got tired working on the site
so I found another designer / programmer.

I decided to do a total site overhaul and finally got started in
June, 2006.  The designer gave me an estimate on a phase by phase
basis.  Phase I was site design and we were right on target.  Phase
II was something else and we were right on target.  The trouble
started at the end of August in Phase 3 when she began the coding
work.  I am not sure exactly what happened, but I think she greatly
underestimated the time to complete this task.

She never told me that we were over budget or how much over we were.
 Instead, she turned hostile whenever I asked her to do anything on
the site - like fix a typo or change a phrase.  On the other hand,
she took the initiative to re-write copy, reseach statistics and
perform other tasks that we didn't contract for her to do.

The e-commerce - most critical part of the site since it brings in
the bacon was done last.  Her programmer was amateur and presented
me with work that was incomplete and just not acceptable.  By this
time, January, 2007, she pretty much refused to do anything but fix
the most glaring problems.  Hostility became totally rude and nasty.

So I terminated our contract.  She is now billing me for triple our
agreed upon price (and the site is still not live - 7 months later).

As a client, this is a real dilemma to me.  I budgeted for the site
based on her representations of cost.  I can't afford to pay her
triple her estimate.  But I do want to be fair - so I'm not sure
really how to proceed.

If I could change one thing about this experience, I would have
asked her to be more clear about costs as we went along.  Before we
went into budget shock, I wish she would have told me in clear money
terms.  For example, if I decided I didn't like a photo she put on
the site, she could have said (in a business like way) - It will
take me 3 hours to change the photo and cost you an additional $200.
 It may delay the launch by a day.

Ultimately the site is not about design - it is about the client's
business.  Sometimes design elements should defer to business
decisions.  With all due respect, I think it is the client's
decision as to the look and feel of the site - not the designer's.
It seems that client's and designers don't always have their
priorities lined up.  So a photo that is perfect for the design may
give the wrong message to a potential customer.

Who knows that better?  The business owner or the web designer?

What a tangled web we weave...

Lynne Diamond, President

Divorce Wizards, Inc.
www.divorcewizards.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Jill Whalen
Subject: Design costs

Shari Thurow asked...

> What do you do when people insist on too many
> renditions of design elements, making the project
> launch date later than expected, and going over budget?

I don't really have an answer to this.  Unfortunately, it seems to
be a huge problem inherent in website design.  If you are in the
business of pleasing your client and producing the highest quality
of work, it's nearly impossible to actually have a profitable design
business.  For the past few years I had been partnered with a design
company and saw this same thing in action.

Once we started tracking time on jobs, and as I watched designs take
from 6 months - 1 year to complete, it became obvious that you
really can't make money as a design firm; exactly for the reasons
Shari talked about in her post.

As I am getting settled into 2007 and changing and growing my
company, I can tell you that I'm going to stay as far away from
website design as possible and stick with services and products that
are profitable!  (i.e., SEO consulting, site audit reports, SEM
seminars and training.)

Best,

Jill Whalen

High RankingsR
Helping Sites to Be the Best They Can Be!
www.highrankings.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Bob Cavanagh
Subject: Design costs

This is in response to Shari Thurow's problem with clients
requesting excessive iterations of design.

Shari,

We have recently used a web design company to redesign our marketing
website.  The contract with them was very specific about the number
of design iterations included at each stage (basically just one
round beyond the initial).  Anything beyond that was billable at a
specified rate.

While as a customer I would have been happier with more opportunity
to "tune" the design it certainly did put a lot of focus into our
review work knowing it would be costly not to provide the best
feedback at each stage.  In the end it probably was best for both us
and the design company.

Bob Cavanagh, Director of Technology
Queen's School of Business


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Jere Matlock
Subject: Design costs

Hi, Shari -

You asked:

> I don't know how other designers give unlimited logo samples.
> I've experienced too many people taking advantage of it (and
> not paying).

We generally specify a clause in our design proposal that we will
provide three possible renditions of a site, from which the client
gets to choose one, and then she gets up to 3 iterations of that
particular design.  This is usually all that is required to arrive
at a design that the client likes, especially since we have our
graphic artists contact the client directly and get her exact ideas
about what she wants the site to look like before we start coming up
with any designs.

We get our clients to find sites that they like and tell us what
about them they would like us to emulate.  We would never steal
designs outright from another website, but we've borrowed many
design elements from other websites over the years, because that's
what the client liked.  I'm talking about colors, placement of
elements on a page, etc.

The next clause in the proposal says that if the client wants to
make more than 3 iterations of the design they choose, that we will
bill for the graphic artist's time at an hourly rate, usually $60
/hour -- something affordable so we won't go broke providing the
service, and yet enough to sting if it goes way over what we
normally provide.  That way we can give unlimited logo samples
happily.  Everybody wins.

Hope that helps.

Jere Matlock
http://www.wordsinarow.com
Website Design & Marketing  / SEO


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Veronica Yuill
Subject: Image spam

> The article mentions the fact that nearly 10% of the world's
> 650 million online computers are 'botnet' victims and are
> being hijacked by hackers to send out spam email...
> http://tinyurl.com/y93uho  [thisislondon.co.uk]
        - Steven Birk, LED Digest 2323

Well, that's not a "fact"; the article says "some researchers claim
..." and then provides no source or justification for either the 650
million or the 10%. What does it mean by an "online computer"? For a
start I suspect it means "Windows computer" since there aren't many
web servers or Unix / Linux / Mac boxes being hijacked in this way
as far as I know.

That's not to say that these botnets and the increasing volume of
spam isn't a huge problem. We get literally hundreds of these every
day.  I'd like to know what on earth ISPs are doing about it. They
must be able to identify that certain of their clients are sending
out massive volumes of email (possibly unwittingly). Why don't they
contact them, explain the problem, and cut off their access till
they get it fixed?

Veronica Yuill


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Will Bontrager
Subject: Yahoo Slurp

> ... you might be inadvertently linking to these
> URLs from a rogue page deep within your website.
        - Derrick Wheeler, LED Digest 2322
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1703/55/

Yes, that's a possibility, considering the weird code and links I've
seen on some scraper sites.

As for our own links, we use very little PHP and utilize few URLs
with query strings to scripts. If it's ours, it was inadvertent.

Feature request for SE spiders: Provide a referrer. Please. It would
make me and I expect other site owners feel grateful when odd URL
requests are noticed. If more than one referrer, then just any one
-- the last one, the first one, doesn't matter which. Referrer
information could save people a lot of time, and let them keep their
hair a while longer.

> Let me know if you would like me to crawl your site to
> see if there are internal links to these pages.

Yes, please do. Thank you. If we're inadvertently linking to those
URLs, I surely want to know about it.

We've operated willmaster.com since 1998, and it has many hundreds
of pages. We test most of our scripts on that domain, so it's
conceivable there might be errant pages scattered about. It may be
prudent to give your crawler a big meal before it starts out; it
could be a long time coming home :)

Yahoo! Slurp is crawling both http://willmaster.com and
http://www.willmaster.com -- and requesting similar URLs. For
example:

http://willmaster.com/autoresponder/?S=A
http://www.willmaster.com/autoresponder/?S=A

The above were crawled the same day, but from different IP addresses.

Mr. Wheeler, you have permission to ignore the robots.txt file
during this crawl. Also, I've disabled code that would deny the IP
addresses of those who snoop where they shouldn't. Just let me know
when the crawler is done so I can re-enable.

And let's report the gist of what you find for interested LEDers.

Will Bontrager


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Shari Thurow
Subject: SEO guide

> ... I don't think an SEO guide is possible. What I just described
> as spam is perfectly acceptable to other SEO firms. Their guide
> would contain considerably different content than my guide.
        - Shari Thurow, LED Digest 2321
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1701/55/

> Shari's argument that the SEO guide could not work
> because different people have different ideas about
> what is good and bad practice makes little sense...
        - John Smart, LED Digest 2323

Hi all-

This is in response to John Smart's post in LED #2321 regarding an
SEO guide. But before that, thanks to everyone who responded to my
design question post. Everything has been quite helpful.

I've said it before, and I will say it again. Do not attribute
thoughts and feelings and intentions to me without asking me first.
John, IMHO, your conclusion was completely false, and you didn't
even have the common courtesy to ask me what I meant.

I do not think an SEO guide is possible because what some firms
consider acceptable is actually search engine spam. If you pay out
enough moola, you might find some SEOs are not as "ethical" as they
promote themselves to be.

To be perfectly honest, I don't think there are enough true experts
on the LED list to come up with a really good SEO guide. The best
search experts I've met have a really good education and experience
in the information retrieval field. A lot of them have user-centered
design (UCD) training and formal education. And this small group of
people (whom I consider to be the true experts) is constantly
continuing their education.

I am aware that I may have come off as snobbish. It was not my
intent, nor was it meant to be mean spirited. As this field evolves
and I meet people, I am continually amazed at how much I don't know
and where I need to evolve. It's hard for me to hear someone
consider him- or herself to be an expert sometimes, when I know that
person just does not have the training, education, or experience. I
have a great deal of respect for copywriters, but I don't consider
copywriters to be search experts without some level of technical
expertise.

Those are my standards. They might be too high for some people. They
are not too high for me. I just don't think an SEO guide is possible
because too many people spam, and too many people make erroneous
cause-and-effect conclusions due to lack of technical knowledge.

And please, just email me or call me. Don't make these false
assumptions. I am sure no LEDer would like it if I made a false
assumption about something they wrote and then published it as fact.

Sincerely,

Shari Thurow

Grantastic Designs, Inc.
http://www.grantasticdesigns.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

The Archives: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/126/120/

Subscribe: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/52/77/

Unsubscribe, Change Email, or Hold / Resume Delivery:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/category/4/17/86/

(c) Copyright 1995-2007 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what
you do. Attitude determines how well you do it." - Lou Holtz