Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2007 archives arrow LED Digest 2382: Befuddled by the SEO Industry
LED Digest 2382: Befuddled by the SEO Industry Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

www.GetWebContent.com/LED : the LED's Key Sponsor
 The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
April 4, 2007                      Issue no. 2382
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW ======================

        --== Befuddled by Bad SEO Companies ==--

                ~ Lorien Carrillo
"Quite honestly, I have been burned before by an
SE company so I'm extremely leery."

                <Moderator Comment>


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Selling with Amazon Merchant ==--

                ~ Steve Ball
"Amazon, historically, accounts for 80+ percent
of our sales."

                ~ Mark J. Welch
"Bottom line: these can be good opportunities."

                ~ Janet Pickard
"It takes a lot of time to build at Amazon. It is my
third year and I finally am seeing daylight."

                <Moderator Comment>

        --== HTML Standards and Search Rankings ==--

                ~ Bob Gladstein
"It seems the discussion of standards has
stopped being productive..."

                ~ Nathan Holley
"Not knocking standards, they're great and all,
but they have no real merit in SEO."

                ~ Tom Aman
"But this whole discrimination issue can be
taken to extremes."

        --== Redirecting Sites with Rewrite ==--

                ~ Adam Audette
"...I'd submit a sitemap to Google's Webmaster
Tools and pick your preferred domain."


========== NEW ===================================

From: Lorien Carrillo
Subject: SEO Companies... befuddled

I've been on this list for many years and today is my first time
posting. I'm considering hiring an SE company, but who to go with?!
I've tried to find reviews, nothing out there that isn't written by
clients of 'X' company on that particular company's site. No one in
my industry uses SE, so I can't get referrals from anyone in my
proverbial circle.

Quite honestly, I have been burned before by an SE company so I'm
extremely leery. What I do know is that our annual output for PPC's
is extremely and ridiculously high, and I'd like to lessen that by
focusing on obtaining natural search results. I don't have the time
nor the expertise to do this myself, so I need to hire a company to
do it for me.

I've been approached by a company called Web Marketing Source /
Captures. I know nothing about them at all. Has anyone here heard of
them, or have feedback about their practices and most importantly
their reputation and results?

Can anyone else give me some recommendations for companies they have
worked with or can suggest?

Thank you so much,

Lorien Carrillo

<Moderator Comment>

This is something I continually hear, Lorien. No standards, no
accreditation, no clue for most people on where to look for SEO
consulting. There are a number of highly reputable folks here on the
LED, so I'm sure you'll hear from them.

The bigger issue here of course is, what can be done to move the SEO
industry forward? For those of us who do this stuff every day,
knowing who the legitimate, quality folks are is easy and automatic.
But what if you were entering this area knowing nothing about it?
What would you do?

Looking forward to the responses,
Adam

Comment?


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Steve Ball
Subject: Amazon Merchant

> Recently, I have been looking at an Amazon Pro-Merchant
> account... Just curious to know if anyone has any experience,
> good or bad, of selling on Amazon?
        - Mark Roberts, LED Digest 2381
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1784/55/

We are an Internet based used bookstore and have been selling on
Amazon, as a Pro Merchant, since 1998.  We sell on two other venues
as well:  ABEBooks and Alibris.  Amazon, historically, accounts for
80+ percent of our sales.

The issues of what and how you can sell on Amazon are somewhat
complex, and worth more space than anyone here in their right mind
might be willing to read.  Basically, though, if your products have
UPC codes then they are generally eligible for selling on Amazon.
And, depending on exactly what you are selling, and the nature of
your business, you might want to try out for "Featured Merchant"
status.

Used books are a special case on Amazon: lots of competition and
constant downward price pressure from the automated megasellers.
(Penny books, anyone? Literally.)

It is probably less dog-eat-dog in other product areas.

For detailed info, I'd advise you to call Amazon Seller Support at
877-251-0696.  Press zero a couple of times and you will give a very
helpful, real live human.  They can direct you to detailed help
pages.

Steve Ball, Owner

Book Nook of Orange County
http://www.amazon.com/shops/booknookoc

Comment?


-------- new post - same topic ---------

From: Mark J. Welch
Subject: Amazon Merchant

Mark Roberts noted that Amazon's products are indexed very favorably
by search engines, and asked "if anyone has any experience, good or
bad, of selling on Amazon?"

I've had some personal experience, and have worked with a number of
clients who also sell through Amazon's "Marketplace", eBay, and
Yahoo Shopping. Bottom line: these can be good opportunities.

I think the key is to understand both the rules and the "strengths
and weaknesses" of each system, and especially to understand the
specifics of the fee structure. For example, if you offer a large
number of SKUs with a relatively low sales level (that is, if you
sell fewer than 10% to 20% of items offered for sale each month),
eBay's fees can wipe out profits very quickly; Amazon's Marketplace
works better in that situation.  You will almost certainly decide to
offer only a subset of your SKUs through eBay, and you may also find
reasons to limit the inventory you list on Amazon.  (Yahoo Shopping
is likely to be a more limited opportunity for most sellers.)

Of course, a key issue is making sure that your inventory and
order-fulfillment systems work smoothly across these multiple
e-commerce platforms, so you don't accept orders from 2 marketplaces
for the same item in your inventory, or misplace a marketplace order
because it didn't come in through your regular online store.  There
are a variety of strategies to bring these "outside" orders into
your internal solution.

Mark J. Welch
http://www.markwelch.com

Comment?


-------- new post - same topic ---------

From: Janet Pickard
Subject: Amazon Merchant

Hi Mark,

I have been a Pro-Merchant for years. I believe you would be placing
your products in the "house and garden" category.

I would do some competitive analysis in that category. First, when
you search for "bird houses" in Amazon what listings come up? I
found that the top 2 were ranked very poorly for sales in that
category. That tells me that there is not much call on Amazon for
your product. But that is for you to say.

Can you compete price and service wise with the folks who are
already there? No matter what you say in your product listing about
time to delivery, Amazon customers expect 5-7 days.

Unlike eBay, where everyone gives you a 5 just for delivering,
Amazon folks will give you a 2 for a day late. They will also hold
you hostage. In Amazon poor ratings means poor product placements.
You do not have much control.

The order and inventory system is horrible. Placing products is a
nightmare.

Do not forget that they will require a contract. Make sure you check
the terms. They may not be very agreeable, especially fees.

It takes a lot of time to build at Amazon. It is my third year and I
finally am seeing daylight.

On, and be careful at the holiday season! You better have in place
the manpower to fulfill orders.

Hope that helps!

Janet Pickard

ChessCentral
www.chesscentral.com

Comment?


<Moderator Comment>

Some additional reading on this topic:

"R. Black" (not the poster's real name, obviously) launched an
attack on the Amazon Merchant program in June of 2006:

> Our company has sold on the web for over 10 years, Amazon
> is by far the poorest managed sales place we have ever encountered.
> The feedback system is completely bogus and often used to blackmail
> the seller. There is no buyer feedback in public view...
        - R. Black, LED Digest 2193
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/403/55/

Not surprisingly, this post stirred up several responses, including
this one from long-time LEDer Scott Marino of www.webundies.com:

> Amazon's ability to move product for us has fueled solid growth
> in our company. Amazon provided the tools needed to automate
> the loading of products and inventory into their database and to
> extract orders in a format for loading into our systems.
        - Scott Marino, LED Digest 2194
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/404/55/

There are more responses and back-and-forth, too, in the next two
issues:

LED Digest 2195
http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/405/55/

LED Digest 2196
http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/406/55/

Also, thanks to Claudiu Spulber of www.novapdf.com here are some
worthwhile discussions about selling with Amazon:

http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?biz.5.350531.14

http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?biz.5.353779.8

Hope this is helpful,
Adam

Comment?


============ Sponsor Message ===========

Have you sat down and read your website lately?

What your site says is crucial in converting
surfers into customers and meeting search engine
mandates for fresh, unique copy.

Our all-pro writers have Fortune 500 experience.
For top-quality, customized, cost-effective copy,
visit http://GetWebContent.com/LED today.

============ Sponsor Message ===========


-------- new post - new topic ---------

From: Bob Gladstein
Subject: Standards

It seems the discussion of standards has stopped being productive,
mostly because people are talking about two different things: W3C
standards for HTML and XHTML, and accessibility standards. I don't
personally believe either one has anything to do with search engine
rankings, although there are jurisdictions where accessibility is a
legal requirement.

Bob Gladstein
www.raisemyrank.com

Comment?


-------- new post - same topic ---------

From: Nathan Holley
Subject: Standards & Rankings

In response to Lee Roberts in the last issue, I find that
information interesting as far as accessibility and disabled access
to the Internet, but fail to see how it relates to search rankings.

Have we reached any conclusions about SEO and HTML standards? Does
proper (x)HTML, that complies with W3C standards, have any
noticeable influence upon rankings in any way?

All of this will only be personal opinion and speculation, so feel
free to consider it worth a penny. I tend to agree with Michael
Martinez -- how can a search engine use coding standards as part of
its algorithm, when it's nothing but an arbitrary standard (an
ideal) and not even close to ubiquitous?

Not knocking standards, they're great and all, but they have no real
merit in SEO. Time to move on!

Nathan Holley

Comment?


-------- new post - same topic ---------

From: Tom Aman
Subject: Standards

> Click and mortar Web sites can offer online only specials
> (oh Southwest Airlines did this and was sued), but if the
> disabled person can't buy through the Web site, why is that
> okay? Isn't this act of discrimination...?
        - Lee Roberts, LED Digest 2381

But this whole discrimination issue can be taken to extremes.  Would
it be considered OK for me to sue a site that only takes credit
cards for payment if I can only pay via PayPal or check.  Does than
not constitute discrimination against people who do not have a
credit card?

Or what about a business (online or mortar) that only takes Master
Card and Visa.  That constitutes discrimination against those who
only carry American Express (or some other card).

On a business trip, if I only access the Web via my cell phone or
PDA and a site is difficult or impossible to view and/or navigate
this way, am I being discriminated against since the site is not
accessible unless I carry a laptop?

It is easy to go on and on in this vein.  Seems to me that offering
some specials only online is not really a serious discrimination
issue - in most cases it is likely to be an advertising / promo
issue where a company may do it mainly to encourage use of their Web
site and many do it.  To sue over this kind of thing seems to me to
be yet another silly lawsuit and there are a lot of them (Lee, did
Southwest Airlines win or lose this one?).

Basically, if you follow usability standards and guidelines that
have been around for a long time (almost as long as the Web), the
site will be accessible and usable for almost anyone who can get
online.  As soon as you add Flash, Javascript, etc., etc., you start
to reduce accessiblity for some people.  But, except for possibly
government and other public service site, I feel the choice should
really be left to the individual company in most cases.

Tom Aman
Aman Software

Comment?


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Adam Audette
Subject: Rewrite and redirection woes

> So now rewrite is in place and the 2 indexed domains
> point to his choice. Which is still not indexed by Google
> after 2 months. Is my rewrite code bad? Here it is...
> Looks right to me...
        - Nathan Holley, LED Digest 2381

Looks right to me, too. One thing to be aware of (that I'm sure you
already know, but anyway) is that your code will redirect any and
all URLs without the "www" to the root www domain. So even if the
valid page "domain.com/pagehere.html" exists, a user will be
redirected to "www.domain.com." Shouldn't be a problem, unless
you've got lots of pages already indexed with non-www URL. Either
way, I'd submit a sitemap to Google's Webmaster Tools and pick your
preferred domain.

> I've never seen Google be so slow indexing
> a site that appears to be properly 301'd.

I'm seeing this all the time. Nothing to worry about, in time you'll
be back in action.

Best wishes,

Adam Audette
http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/40/79/

Comment?


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by GetWebContent.com
The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.
Free no-obligation proposal: http://GetWebContent.com/LED

The Archives: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/126/120/

Subscribe: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/52/77/

Unsubscribe, Change Email, or Hold / Resume Delivery:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/category/4/17/86/

(c) Copyright 1995-2007 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"It is by going down into the abyss that we recover the treasures of
life. Where you stumble, there lies your treasure." - Joseph Campbell