Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

 
LED Digest 2407: Headaches and Eyestrain Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

www.GetWebContent.com/LED : the LED's Key Sponsor
 The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
May 10, 2007                        Issue no. 2407
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW =====================

        --== Do Macs Need Virus Protection Now? ==--

                ~ Tom Aman
"...just wanted to pass the info along for the
consideration of Mac users."


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Migrating to ASP.net - Ranking Concerns ==--

                ~ Marty R. Milette
"Using specific filenames with extensions
is generally a poor practice."

                ~ Nathan Holley
"The best possible solution to this issue is ISAPI..."

        --== Shopping Carts, Sub-Domains & SEO ==--

                ~ Lee Roberts
"An 'A-record' allows you to have another IP
address respond to your domain..."

        --== Headaches & Eyestrain ==--

                ~ Donald Nelson
"...graduated bifocals are better suited
to computer use..."

                ~ Brad Waller
"...is your monitor set for at least 72 Hz?"

        --== Vertical Search Engines ==--

                ~ Chris Nielsen
"...we are in the middle of a large trend
of people creating directories..."


==== BULLETIN BOARD =============

        --== New Domain Registry Spam Scam ==--
                ~ Bob Cavanagh


=========== NEW ==================================

From: Tom Aman
Subject: Do Macs need Virus / Adware / Trojan Protection now?

This is not intended to start yet another discussion on the relative
merits / problems / safety of Windows / Mac / Linux, I just wanted
to pass the info along for the consideration of Mac users.

I use two programs to keep my Windows XP Pro system as safe as
practical. One is McAfee (anti virus), the other is CounterSpy (anti
spyware / ad ware). CounterSpy sends out a regular news letter and
the following appeared in the May 4 issue, and I quote:

------------------
"Just when You Thought It Safe to Run Macs

"Firefox was acting funny when I tried to load yahoo mail on my Mac.
I had a hunch it might be adware. The only thing I could find to run
was MacScan and found 40 Trojans malware, etc. Now Firefox works
well again. The consensus on the net is that spyware doesn't really
bother Mac users, like this article in Macworld:
http://www.counterspynews.com/AFQFUR/070504-Mac-Malware : (While
Windows users might need a dedicated spyware-catcher, I'm not
convinced there's a real need for such specific Mac software.)

"I don't think that's true anymore. With more Mac users than ever
before, there's a big market for both sides of the coin."
------------------

I did a quick search and found MacScan at http://www.securemac.com/
and it appears to provide a 30 day trial.  I think it would be
interesting / educational if LED Mac users would give that program a
try and report back to LED on the results - either finding nothing
and proving the contention that Macs are not usually troubled by
virus / adware / trojans / etc. is correct OR finding enough to show
that Mac systems should now be protected.

Tom Aman
Aman Software

Comment?


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Marty R. Milette
Subject: ASP to ASP.net and SEO

> We are contemplating an upgrade from ASP to
> ASP.net and have concerns that page names
> domain/page.asp to domain/page.aspx will
> have a negative impact on search engine rankings.
        - Anonymous, LED Digest 2406
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1810/55/

Using specific filenames with extensions is generally a poor
practice.

For example, some people like to create a single folder, and have
separate HTML files for every page, but a better way is to use the
server default for every page name and organize the pages into
folders.

I normally create a three-layer heirarchy with a root folder
containing just a few files (robots.txt, default.asp or
default.aspx) and folders for images, scripts, CSS, etc. plus
folders for each topic or theme.

Within the folders for each topic or theme, I would use a separate
folder for each page, and within these folders, use the standard
default page name.

This way, you can use default filenames and extensions and refer to
pages like this:

Use: www.mydomain.com or mydomain.com instead of:
www.mydomain.com/default.aspx or mydomain.com/default.asp

Use: www.mydomain.com/Topicname/Pagename/ instead of:
www.mydomain.com/Topicname/Pagename.aspx

The additional benefit is that by having a separate folder for each
page, you can dump all the 'stuff' (images, sound, video files,
etc.) related to that page into the same folder. It keeps things
organized very nicely.

This completely isolates the site from any dependency on page names
or extensions. IIS allows you to specify a 'priority' of default
page names you can edit as you wish. (As you are migrating your
site, you can have default.aspx first in the list, followed by
default.asp, followed by default.htm or whatever you like.)

Don't forget that there is no 'requirement' to rename all your pages
to .aspx -- unless you need to use specific .net features, you can
leave the names as they are.

Marty R. Milette
http://www.hotel-club.net

Comment?


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Nathan Holley
Subject: ASP & filenames

The best possible solution to this issue is ISAPI
http://www.isapirewrite.com/, a rewrite tool for Windows servers
that will automagically direct aspx requests to asp, or vice versa
if you want.

Here's what ISAPI is:
http://www.codeproject.com/isapi/isapi_extensions.asp

And here's a good primer on using it:
http://www.codeproject.com/isapi/isapiredirector.asp

Nathan Holley

Comment?


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Lee Roberts
Subject: Shopping carts

> Are there any downsides, in terms of search engine
> results and visibility, integrating a hosted shopping
> cart as a sub-domain on [another host]?
        - M. Williams, LED Digest 2405
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1809/55/

No one can guarantee search engine results.

In order to answer the question, I must assume a few factors.

1. You want to use a cart like MonsterCommerce, but not Nexternal
(I'll cover the difference in a moment).

2. You have full control over your DNS settings.

3. You know how to configure your DNS settings.

With a MonsterCommerce type provider, you typically host your
complete site on their servers.  Therefore, your checkout and cart
pages would be in the same domain as your non-shopping cart and
catalog pages.

With Nexternal, you typically get a small hosting for your
non-shopping cart pages.  The cart and checkout pages would be under
https:/account_name.nexternal.com. (I broke the link purposefully)

Now, if you're using a MonsterCommerce type of cart and if you have
control over your DNS settings and know how to configure them, you
can easily set up an "A-record."  An "A-record" allows you to have
another IP address respond to your domain using a subdomain.  For
example, your domain may be at 79.86.247.150 and your store may be
at 79.84.240.152.  The store could then use the subdomain of
STORE.yourdomain.com.

As far as Alexa is concerned you're still under the same domain.

As far as the search engines are concerned, there is only difference
in the IP usage.

The ultimate question posed was "...will this affect search engine
positions?" It will not make any difference in how the search
engines view your website and online store.  Google will simply add
your new web pages to their supplemental results until you build
enough age and links into the store.

If you're using a Nexternal type shopping cart, you're not going to
be able to do as described.  Your shopping cart would operate within
their domain.

The question comes down to why the shopping cart provider would tell
you that you can't use their software under an "A-record" setup.
There are four possibilities.

1.  They purchase the SSL cert for your store and purchase it under
the domain versus a subdomain; i.e. yourdomain.com versus
store.yourdomain.com.  This is a customer service issue.

2.  They realize you're going to have high bandwidth which means
they earn extra money that they are not willing let you go without
paying.  This is a customer service issue.

3.  Their sales people may not be aware of the possibility of doing
as you would like.  This is a customer service issue.

4.  Your product pictures will need to reside on their servers
because of how their software is programmed.  This is a valid excuse.

The fact of the matter is it can be done, but is the company willing
to allow you to do so?

Regards,

Lee Roberts
http://www.applepiecart.com

Comment?


============ Sponsor Message ===========

GetWebContent.com has a few words just for you.
Relevant words, search-engine optimized words.

Words that will impress both your customers and
visiting search engine bots.

Exclusive words custom written to meet your specs.

Many other writing services recycle web content,
at http://GetWebContent.com/LED we create it.

============ Sponsor Message ===========


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Donald Nelson
Subject: Headaches

> Since first going computerized in 1984, I've had fatigue
> issues involving the computer. Recently they've been
> much worse. headaches and eyestrain start after only
> a few minutes sometimes...
        - Shel Horowitz, LED Digest 2403
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1806/55/

Dear All,

I agree with Bob Cavanaugh, LED 2405: graduated bifocals are better
suited to computer use than trying to switch between different pairs
of glasses.

I tried using two sets of glasses and this also caused headaches.
If you are in this situation then it would be worthwhile to invest
in some new graduated bifocal glasses.

Best Wishes,

Donald Nelson
www.a1-optimization.com

Comment?


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Brad Waller
Subject: Headaches

Shel, is your monitor set for at least 72 Hz?  Computers come stock
with the refresh rate set to 60 Hz.  Many people get headaches from
the 60 Hz flicker that they might not even be able to detect from
flourescent lights and computer monitors.  I do.  Maybe get your
eyes checked and get glasses just for the PC?

With no disrespect to Tom, no diode, magnet, or copper coil will
stop an EMF.  I have a background in Physics, and I am not saying
that EMFs do or do not cause physiological issues, and I can't say
one way or ther other about essential oils.  But putting a diode in
your pocket or next to your screen will not affect an area larger
than a few centimeters.  Magnets on either side of your head?  Who
knows about that.  Do know that a moving magnet makes it's own EMF,
and unless you are locked down tight you are moving all the time.

You can buy EMF sheilds for monitors (or use LCD monitors as they
have substantially lower fields), although I have no idea how well
these sheilds really work. A metal PC case is a pretty good shield,
but if you want more you can make a copper mesh enclosure for your
computer to really sheild it well.  Power falls at the square of the
distance, so you could get extra long cables or Bluetooth and put
your PC a dozen feet away from you.

It also makes sense to ensure you have proper eyewear, lighting, and
ergonomic placement of the monitor and keyboard.  Look at the
placement of your monitor and make sure you are in a comfortable
postion, no glare off the screen, etc.
http://www.ergonomics.ucla.edu/

If you want a really stable field, you could set up a Helmholtz coil
around your office...  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_coil

If I had to take a guess, I would say that Shel's issue is either
ergonomic or optical.

Brad Waller

Manage and Sell your own site advertising
http://adjungle.com
waller, adjungle.com

Comment?


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Chris Nielsen
Subject: VSE

Right now we are in the middle of a large trend of people creating
directories ( Heck, I have 2 myself right now and would have more if
I had the time.). Many of these will not survive and the reasons
could be a entire topic of it's own. But I think many will and there
are many benefits to bother the owner and to those that use them.
Most directories use free or very inexpensive software and the main
effort is just in the review and editing process.

What we don't see yet, are the spread of small search engine sites
(I have 3 of these currently). I concur that we will see more and
more vertical search engines, but I think these will be very focused
as people see the value and the power in creating them. I don't
think that "next-generation Googles" are the answer, but a large
number of small vertical search engines that you will find by using
sites like Google. Search may become more of a two-step process
where you use a major search engine and in the results will be one
or more vertical search engine that you can visit to really focus in
on the topic you are looking for.

While you can refine your search in most search engines, most people
don't even know how to use something as simple as quotes (" ") to
zero in and make their search more effective. Unless someone starts
a nationwide campaign (Quotes will float your boat!), this will not
change.

Running a small search engine does not have to be expensive or
technical and can take less time than maintaining a directory since
no editing of listings is needed. You just review the site to make
sure it's valid, then the spider takes care of the indexing.

Thank you,

Chris Nielsen
http://www.sundewsearch.com/

Comment?


==== BULLETIN BOARD ===============================

From: Bob Cavanagh
Subject: Domain Registry

> It seems the Domain Registry of America are
> trying a new variation on their "domain transfer
> disguised as an invoice" ploy.
        - Steve Pronger, LED Digest 2406
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1810/55/

These scum-bags operate in Canada as well under a suitably-modified
country name. But here they operate in a much more insidious manner.
They send these notices in the regular mail and address them to
"accounts payable" or similar. At a first glance it is an invoice.
On a closer look one realizes that it is not an invoice and they
have very cleverly written these notices to avoid legal action. But
I'm sure many organizations without tight sign-off controls or a
single person managing their domains fall for their scam.

I've considered taking this to CIRA or ICANN but upon re-reading the
notices I just don't think I'd get anywhere.

Bob Cavanagh, Director of Technology
Queen's School of Business

Comment?


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by GetWebContent.com
The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.
Free no-obligation proposal: http://GetWebContent.com/LED

The Archives: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/126/120/

Subscribe: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/52/77/

Unsubscribe, Change Email, or Hold / Resume Delivery:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/category/4/17/86/

(c) Copyright 1995-2007 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"If a man be gracious and courteous to strangers, it shows he is a
citizen of the world, and that his heart is no island cut off from
other lands, but a continent that joins to them." - Francis Bacon