Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2007 archives arrow LED Digest 2439: SEO - The Ubiquitous Hammer
LED Digest 2439: SEO - The Ubiquitous Hammer Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

www.GetWebContent.com/LED : the LED's Key Sponsor
 The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.

www.SEOToolSet.com/training/ : the LED's Premier Sponsor
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification

==================================================
Guest Moderator:                    Published by:
John Audette                          LED Digest
john, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
.............................................
June 27, 2007                       Issue no. 2439
.............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== NEW =======================

        --== Database Generated vs. Static Pages ==--

                ~ Jackie Monticup
"Are we going to take a hit in the search engines
for these changes?


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== The SEO Hammer ==--

                ~ Ari Ozick
"SEO has become a tool that works."

        --== Domain Naming ==--

                ~ Chris Nielsen
"Domains that do use hyphens enjoy the ability
to be matched for more search queries."

                ~ Dan Rosenfield
"I have had pretty good success with hyphenated
domain names."

                ~ Tom Anson
"...I sometimes have to explain what a hyphen is..."

        --== Duplicate Content ==--

                ~ Nancy Cardinali
"Why does Google consider it duplicate content?"


======== NEW ========================

From: Jackie Monticup
Subject: Rankings For Database Generated vs. Static Pages

We are about to make the first major change in our site in seven
years. Your opinions please - how will this affect our search engine
rankings?

Our site has always been built with static HTML pages. I worked hard
(and listened to your advice) over the years to optimize the pages
for both people and search engines, and I'm proud to say that we
enjoy rankings in the top 3 for terms such as "magic tricks", "magic
shop", specific magic tricks names, Houdini, etc. In addition to our
online shop, we provide many pages of relevant information about
magic history and magicians (resulting in a number of consulting
jobs for TV shows and movies!). We also have an active links trading
program with mutually beneficial sites.

It's time for an upgrade to our shopping cart system. We will be
using Monster Commerce from Network Solutions, which will allow us
to greatly automate our backend and will make it much easier to
manage our online product offerings.

The two main differences will be:

1) we will be changing hosts from Hostway to Network Solutions and

2) our product pages will now be database generated rather than
static HTML ones.

Are we going to take a hit in the search engines for these changes?
And if so, what can I do to mitigate the damage? Thanks for your
help.

Magically,

Jackie Monticup
http://www.magictricks.com

Comment?


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Ariel Ozick
Subject: SEO as the Ubiquitous Hammer?

> Has Internet marketing been reduced to optimizing
> for Google searches? I realize that SEO is a powerful
> hammer -- but is everything a nail? If it is, it is. Let's
> talk about it.
        - John Audette, LED Digest 2436
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1841/190/

Our Striving Moderator laments the focus on SEO and specifically
Google on this list and in general. As someone who does a lot of
SEO/SEM for myself and others, here are my thoughts:

The other internet mediums that John mentions are alive and kicking
(well, except maybe for banner advertising). Social media, viral
content, guerilla marketing, cultivating journalists, affiliate
marketing, etc. are all proven ways that still work when you want to
market something.

So why the focus on SEO/SEM? I think for two reasons - the targeted,
interested traffic and the science involved in it. The first reason
is obvious, but what do I mean by science? Well, while SEO is
difficult to achieve, everyone knows what you need - a good site,
good content, excellent links, title tags, description tags and a
little bit of secret seo sauce. But by and large we know what works,
what influences the algorithms, and how to make the engines think
that one site is more relevant for a given subject then another.

The same is not true with other venues. We don't always know what
will make something viral, we don't want to invest the money to
create what Seth Godin describes as the Purple Cow - something truly
remarkable, because we don't know if it will work. So in a certain
sense SEO (and to a certain extent SEM) has become a tool that
works, mainly requires effort and time, but has results, assuming
you give it enough resources.

So to the thread that started this thought - employers not using
search engines - how do you reach the employers? I would suggest
creating online tools for employers (how much will an employee cost
in payroll taxes, for example) and using it as bait. Get the name of
a few local journalists and tell them about your new site - but make
sure it does something different. Maybe offer a matchmaking service
between employers and employees, or charge employees to search for
jobs? It's no longer 1998, so if you want to be talked about, you
have to be different and unique.

On a final note I'd like to briefly mention defensible traffic in
terms of SEO. Sites come and go for keywords on Google. It happens.
I worked with a site that dropped from #1 to #30 to #50 across the
board for major keyword terms, in a market where adwords was not
cost effective. What do you do? You prepare by building defensible
traffic - generic domains with your keyword that bring type-in
traffic, facebook widgets, develop a community before the drop. Any
good SEO guy needs to tell you this - build defensible traffic!

In any event I already think that John will cut this email off
because it's awfully long, so let me just wish everyone a great
weekend and God Bless! Equip your toolbox with many tools, not just
a hammer!

Ari Ozick

Wired Rhino, Inc.
http://www.wiredrhino.com

Comment?


============ Sponsor Message ===========

Speaking of July 4th, did you know website
content is a lot like fireworks?

It either lights up the (cyber)sky, or it doesn't.

Do your articles, product pages, and blogs
have more fizzle than sizzle?
Is your home page copy a dud? 

Visit http://GetWebContent.com/LED
and get maximum bang for your buck.

============ Sponsor Message ===========


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Chris Nielsen
Subject: Domain Naming

> ... is a hyphen prefered to separate words making
> up a domain name or just run them together...?
        - Terry Smith, LED Digest 2437
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1842/190/

My first question is how will you use the extra domains and how do
you think they will help? Extra domains pointing to the same site,
or "Parked" on a site will result in only one of the domains being
considered "valid" for the content with the others discounted. This
is generally true although I have seen some cases where more than
one domain gets valid PR, but I don't know that traffic or exposure
is really increased. It's a duplication that usually gets filtered
out.

For domains, you have a choice of using the version without hyphens
that is easier to type and that people find more "attractive, or a
version with hyphens that is not as attractive or as valuable if you
are later selling it. But domains without hyphens will generally not
match search queries unless the query is in the same word order
("led digest" should match "leddigest.com"). If there are other word
or sub-words created that are not intended by joining words
together, they will generally not be found. The amount of effort
needed to determine all possible words in a domain is not something
that you would try to figure out, since they are not likely to be
"intended".

Domains that do use hyphens enjoy the ability to be matched for more
search queries, since the "words" are clearly defined with the
hyphens that are treated like spaces. While I have quite a few
domains with hyphens that enjoy good traffic, I cannot say how much
advantage is gained by this, and do NOT recommend that clients use
them only for any possible traffic gains. The best thing is a short
dot com domain with no hyphens.

Thank you,

Chris Nielsen
ojdl.com

Comment?


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Dan and Mary Rosenfield
Subject: Domain Naming

Hello:

In response to Terry Smith's question about search engines' reaction
to hyphenated domain names, while I have no hard empirical data, I
have had pretty good success with 3 such domains:

http://www.college-scholarships.com
http://www.guaranteed-scholarships.com
http://www.online-degrees-and-scholarships.com

All have top ten rankings (in Yahoo and Google) and all are Google
PR 6's (after one recently dropped from a 7). I am by no means
confident that the hyphenated URL's have helped, but it seems
reasonable to assume they have not been a negative.

My guess is that having keywords in the URL... hyphenated or not...
is a good idea and that many factors, on page and off, are of
greater importance than whether or not a site's URL's are hyphenated.

As I do whenever I post, I would like to thank Adam and all of the
Digest subscribers for all I've learned and continue to learn from
them.  And, before I go, I'd like to recommend a website where I
have found some great tools:

http://www.webuildpages.com/tools/default.htm

The "Backlink & Anchor Text Tool" is as helpful a tool as I've ever
used. Other than being an appreciative user, I have no affiliation
with the site.

May the search engines be kind to all of us.

Dan Rosenfield

Comment?


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Tom Anson
Subject: Domain Naming

Hi Terry,

I tend to agree with Micheal Linehan and our talented moderator,
John, when it comes to domain names.  Specifically, when I was
choosing the domain name for my chief website, my first thought (on
my third shot at choosing a domain name) was to make it READABLE --
forget running the words together into a jumble of unintelligible
letters.  I chose to add the hyphen, and came out with
www.therapeutic-grade.com.  I really thought it would be easier for
my visitors to read and remember.

That might be true, but it's a pain to give to someone over the
phone.

I not only have the problem of people misspelling therapeutic (they
tend to settle for theraputic), I always have to explain that
there's a hyphen in there (and sometimes have to explain what a
hyphen is).  Like Michael said, "Sheesh!"  No matter how it looks to
you (or the search engines), "People expect the words in a URL to be
run together".

Tom Anson

The Essential Oils Desk Reference
http://www.therapeutic-grade.com/References/desk-ref.html

Comment?


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Nancy Cardinali
Subject: Duplicate Content

Chuck Hiatt's duplicate content issues:

> To address potential duplicate content penalties,
> manipulate your htaccess file and redirect secondary
> domains to the preferred listing.
        - Chuck Hiatt, LED Digest 2432
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1837/190/

To which Shari Thurow responded:

> Chuck certainly gave great advice. Search engines certainly
> want you to deliver them the "canonical" (that's what they call it)
> URL to them.
        - Shari Thurow, LED Digest 2433
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1838/190/

All of this is confusing to me. Just because my browser will use any
of the above urls to get to my home page, why would Google consider
it duplicate content?

Or better yet, can you explain how I could have truck parts at
domain.com, clothing at www.domain.com/ and gourmet food at
www.domain.com/index.html ?

Take it a step further and add www.domain.com/index.htm,
www.domain.com/index.php... etc.

Can someone explain how this, what I would call browser behavior,
could possibly trigger Google's filters? Especially if there is no
way of having different content on at least these three 'pages':

domain.com
www.domain.com/
www.domain.com/index.html

I have been pondering this since Chuck wrote about it. I'd like to
hear more.

Thank you,

Nancy Cardinali
www.CardinaliDesigns.com
*Consolidate your online and print image for name recognition*

P.S. Nice to meet you John!

Comment?


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by:

GetWebContent.com
The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.
Free no-obligation proposal: http://GetWebContent.com/LED

SEOToolSet.com
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification
Join the certified SEO directory: www.SEOToolSet.com/training/

The Archives: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/126/120/

Subscribe: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/52/77/

Unsubscribe, Change Email, or Hold / Resume Delivery:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/category/4/17/86/

(c) Copyright 1995-2007 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"I think that hate is a thing, a feeling, that can only exist where
there is no understanding." - Tennessee Williams