Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2007 archives arrow LED Digest 2465: The Burden of Free Consultations
LED Digest 2465: The Burden of Free Consultations Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

www.GetWebContent.com/LED : the LED's Key Sponsor
 The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.

www.SEOToolSet.com/training/ : the LED's Premier Sponsor
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification

==================================================
List Moderator:                       Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
August 7, 2007                    Issue no. 2465
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW ======================

        --== Free Consultations ==--

                ~ Shari Thurow
"Some people have the audacity to ask me
question after question after question..."


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== SEO and Web Standards ==--

                ~ Beth Earle
"...there's a slightly different take, straight
from a Googler's mouth."

        --== The Hell of CSS [was: SEO Standards] ==--

                ~ Nancy Cardinali
"I'd have to rebut every comment made about
CSS and it's degree of difficulty..."

                ~ Rich Dudley
"Check out the CSS support in the next
version of Visual Studio..."

                ~ Michael Linehan
"CSS is not the problem."

        --== The Hard Sell of 'Free' ==--

                ~ Reg Charie
"...FireFox has made millions by incorporating
their AdSense account as the search tool."

        --== Marketing Ethics ==--

                ~ Barry S Mills
"...it stands for User Generated Content."


=========== NEW ==================================

From: Shari Thurow
Subject: Free consultations

Hi all-

I've been meaning to ask the group this for a long time, as I am not
a salesperson and don't have that talent / skill.

I get a lot of people who want a free consultation in different
forms. Some people ask me to take a quick glance at their respective
Web sites and want some quick feedback. Some companies put out RFIs
or RFPs purely to get a free consultation (and I try to sniff those
out so I don't waste my time).

Some of my SEO colleagues are good about mailing each other when we
can tell someone is scoping us out purely for a free consultation.
An example would be an RFP with questions about strategy. The
company gets strategies from a number of SEO firms and doesn't hire
any of them. So that's one thing I do that helps.

The one I have the biggest problem with? The people who ask me to do
a quick look-see at their sites. If I have a couple of extra
minutes, I don't mind doing it. I have this rule about doing one
completely selfless act per month, and sometimes, a quick look-see
is my selfless act.

Two things: Don't ask me for my opinion if you don't want it. I've
been doing Web design and usability and SEO for 12 years now. I have
a lot of data and experience to back up what my opinion of a site
is. Some sites I look at are great; some of them are not. My
feedback isn't meant to be spiteful. I just get upset with people
who want my opinion and then label me as unprofessional or not an
expert just because, well, their site wasn't as great as they
assumed I'd say. They asked for my opinion.

Second, the follow-up. Some people have the audacity to ask me
question after question after question just from the quick feedback,
which I am doing because I want to. In reality, my time is valuable
to me and my clients. If I am taking the time to give you a freebie,
don't take advantage of me, and knock it off with the name calling
because I'm not giving a full site analysis for free. End of vent
fest.

I am not this forthright when these situations occur. I just want to
communicate the sentiments. Have any LEDers had this type of
situation in your respective fields? How did you handle it more
effectively? Like people who want endless renditions of logo designs
(ugh).

My tip, just to reiterate, is to have a good community to sniff out
the RFPs / RFIs that are bogus and share. Any other good ones?

Thank you!

Sincerely,

Shari Thurow, Founder and SEO Director
Omni Marketing Interactive

~ Search Engine Visibility book now available
http://www.searchenginesbook.com/


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Beth Ann Earle
Subject: SEO standards

> .... HTML coding standards - regardless of who
> proposes them and who enforces them - are
> irrelevant to search engine optimization.
        - Michael Martinez, LED Digest 2464
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1875/190/

Hmmm ... I'm not quite so sure ...

A coworker (unaware of the discussion currently raging in the LED)
emailed me a link to this piece last week:

http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3626600

The article is based on an interview with "Dan Crow, who is part of
Google's search quality group and is the Product Manager for the
crawl infrastructure group". At one point, the writer asks Dan "if
it would help to move JavaScript and CSS definitions to external
files, and clean up tag soup(?) Dan's answer was refreshingly clear.
'Those would be very good ideas,' he said."

So, there's a slightly different take, straight (in theory, at
least) from a Googler's mouth.

Wishing all the best to LED'ers everywhere,

Beth Earle
www.pilotfishseo.com


============ Sponsor Message ===========

Have you sat down and read your website lately?

What your site says is crucial in converting
surfers into customers and meeting search engine
mandates for fresh, unique copy.

Our all-pro writers have Fortune 500 experience.
For top-quality, customized, cost-effective copy,
visit GetWebContent.com today.
http://GetWebContent.com/LED

============ Sponsor Message ===========


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Nancy Cardinali
Subject: The Hell of CSS

> [CSS is] the meanest design environment I can remember,
> except for designing in postscript, which I dimly remember
> and was HELL.

> CSS encourages cookie-cutter design, limited to the
> styles already set. It's suited best to output from content
> management systems.
        - Shaun Johnston, LED Digest 2464
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1875/190/

Whoa Shaun!

I'd have to rebut every comment made about CSS and it's degree of
difficulty, but I KNOW others will do that! It took me awhile, and a
bit of nudging, to finally jump into CSS (and I still don't use it
fully). I am sooo happy I did.

I won't rant on, but I do hope you will take the time to learn it.
Believe me, you will be a happy camper.

I'd be willing to help you 'crack the code', if you ned help along
the way.

Good Luck!

Nancy Cardinali
www.CardinaliDesigns.com
*Consolidate your online and print image for name recognition*


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Richard J. Dudley
Subject: The Hell of CSS [was: SEO standards]

> I reckon we're 10 years from getting a respectable
> web design program with a decent GUI.
        - Shaun Johnston

Help may be closer than you think.  Check out the CSS support in the
next version of Visual Studio:

http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/07/25/vs-2008-web...

You don't have to be a programmer to use VS -- support for C# et al.
is only part of the package.  In fact, many of these features will
be available in the free Visual Web Developer Express, and some are
in the current Expression Web tool, which replaces FrontPage.

Rich Dudley
www.bloomeryweddings.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Michael Linehan
Subject: CSS formatting

> I don't use CSS, I use the old and no-longer supported FONT
> tags. And I expect to go on doing so until they no longer work.
> With CSS, every web site essentially becomes a new design
> program,
        - Shaun Johnston

Hello Shaun,

What you are describing is akin to having a fifty-page Word document
where every heading and every paragraph is individually formatted.
Do you use "Styles" in such a circumstance?  I hope so.  Otherwise,
I hate to think what you'd have to go through to change any
formatting in that Word document.

CSS formatting is just the Web equivalent of using those styles in a
Word document. Just like "every web site becomes a new design
program", every Word document's styles are different.  This really
is not a problem.  The ease of manipulation of formatting enormously
outweighs any problem with setup or with the styles being different
in different documents.

Also, one thing that may make considering CSS easier - work with CSS
formatting first.  Then consider CSS layout further down the road.

I am not a CSS geek - i.e. "CSS is the only true way".  It's simply
that I remember when I shifted to using CSS formatting instead of
font tags and so on.  The ease of use is staggering.

> CSS encourages cookie-cutter design, limited to the styles already
> set. It's suited best to output from content management systems.

Take a look at www.csszengarden.com.  What you'll see there goes far
beyond most web design in its creativity and graphical quality.  CSS
is not the problem.  The problem lies in the abilities of some of
the people using it.  Banal, cookie-cutter design can also be seen
from those who use table-layout or individually specified fonts.

Michael Linehan, Marketing Alchemy
www.marketing-alchemy.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Reg Charie
Subject: Selling free

> Free, open-source Firefox has made serious inroads
> into IE's market share with no marketing budget.
        - Veronica Yuill, LED Digest 2464

I have always understood that FireFox has made millions by
incorporating their AdSense account as the search tool.

Reg Charie
http://DotCom-Productions.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Barry Mills
Subject: Ethics

> Barry, forgive my ignorance -- what's UCG?
        - Shel Horowitz, LED Digest 2464

Apologies to Shel & anyone else not familiar with the term -- it
stands for User Generated Content. I was rushing, but that's no
excuse, sloppy posting.

In this case I was thinking of reviews, testimonials and indeed
criticism from users commenting on the ethical (or otherwise)
practices of companies they have done business with. Make sure you
get the legal position right and don't end up assuming
responsibility for the content of posts though!

Barry S Mills
Chairman
Netstep Corporate Communications
http://www.netstep.co.uk


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by:

GetWebContent.com
The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.
Free no-obligation proposal: http://GetWebContent.com/LED

SEOToolSet.com
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification
Join the certified SEO directory: www.SEOToolSet.com/training/

The Archives: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/126/189/

Subscribe: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/52/187/

Unsubscribe, Change Email, or Hold / Resume Delivery:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/category/4/17/201/

(c) Copyright 1995-2007 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Once the last trace of emotion has been eradicated, nothing remains
of thought but absolute tautology." - Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno