Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2007 archives arrow LED Digest 2469: Marketing on Facebook
LED Digest 2469: Marketing on Facebook Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

www.GetWebContent.com/LED : the LED's Key Sponsor
 The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.

www.SEOToolSet.com/training/ : the LED's Premier Sponsor
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification

==================================================
List Moderator:                       Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
August 13, 2007                    Issue no. 2469
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


======= NEW ====================

        --== Marketing on Facebook ==--

                ~ Steve Birk
"Looking forward to hearing more on your
thoughts about Facebook."

                <Moderator Comment>


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Pop-ups and Pop-unders ==--

                ~ Tom Aman
"...creating them involves a fair bit of effort
with very little, if any, return."

                ~ Renee Kennedy
"...ask to run a test to see if it will work."

                ~ John Smart
"On a similar note, I just got a Wii!"

        --== What to do with a Second Domain? ==--

                ~ Martyn Gay
"This one can be chalked up alongside the
other SEO myths that many 'experts' like to peddle."

                <Moderator Comment>

                ~ Will Bontrager
"Domain longevity may be a factor in search
results positioning..."


========== NEW ===================================

From: Steve Birk
Subject: Facebook

> I've been exploring Facebook a bunch,
> it's really an interesting platform.
        - Adam Audette, LED Digest 2466
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1877/190/

Apparently so has Wal-Mart, who just launched the "Roommate Style
Match" group on Facebook, in the hopes of grabbing a larger chunk of
back-to-school shopping dollars.

http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN0843464220070808

Looking forward to hearing more on your thoughts about Facebook.
Obviously when the worlds largest retailer uses this social
networking site in the hopes of increasing sales, then that may
raise some eyebrows and make people wonder just what is this
Facebook anyways? It does me...

Regards,

Steven Birk
http://MedicalNewsCenter.com
Complete, Current and Credible Medical News Coverage

<Moderator Comment>


Thanks for these comments, Steve. What Wal-Mart (and everyone else
marketing on Facebook) is really interested in is leveraging the
huge numbers of users on the site (I know, duh!). Let me make that
comment more productive: Facebook represents a massive closed
community (in the sense of a proprietary platform and large reach),
but with an open API that allows absolutely anyone the ability to
leverage it for marketing purposes.

The challenge of Facebook and other closed social platforms, is that
they're reinventing the Internet as a closed Web. The opportunity
for people like me who practice Internet marketing, is to market on
the platform using the tools Facebook provides.

This is what Wal-Mart is attempting to do, and as a marketing move
it's actually pretty interesting for a few reasons.

One of the assumptions you make when you launch a Facebook group is
that the community will do the driving. No matter how careful and
strategic the messaging is by any company engaging this network, in
the end it's the users who populate and thus define a group. In
other words, Wal-Mart is opening themselves up to public criticism
on Facebook.

Here's the group so you can see what I mean: http://snurl.com/1phwm
[facebook.com]. Note the debate and criticisms already forming there.

In a sense this is good for Wal-Mart because they must address this
type of criticism if they're going to enter the demographic they're
targeting here (college kids). So the key is what they do with that
challenge: they've created a group for discussions to happen, now
they have to work on company transparency in addressing the
complaints and criticisms launched at them.

I wonder why they didn't simply create a Facebook app instead? An
app is a cool viral way to "plug in" to the social community without
necessarily giving them a platform to rail you with.

At first glance, this move by Wal-Mart reveals a real lack of
insight into Facebook and social networking. Unless they're prepared
(and staffed) to deal with the community getting out of hand on
their branded group, the camel's nose is already under the tent and
about to pull its head up.

Is Wal-Mart prepared for marketing on Facebook? It remains to be
seen.

-Adam


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Tom Aman
Subject: Pop-ups

> First off, I hate [pop-ups and pop-unders] but I have
> a big client who wants to use them. I want to make
> one last pitch to talk him out of it and I need your help.
        - Brett Atkin, LED Digest 2468
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1879/190/

Just a quick thought - since most browsers are usually set to block
pop-ups / unders, maybe a fast pitch would be to find a site or two
that is attempting to use them and show the client that they are
usually blocked. This means that creating them involves a fair bit
of effort with very little, if any, return.

A quote from Wikipedia may also help:

------------------------
"Opera was the first major browser to incorporate tools to block
pop-up ads; the Mozilla browser later improved on this by blocking
only pop-ups generated as the page loads. In the early 2000s, all
major web browsers except Internet Explorer allowed the user to
block unwanted pop-ups almost completely. In 2004, Microsoft
released Windows XP, SP2, which added pop-up blocking to Internet
Explorer."
------------------------

In most cases, pop-ups / unders only serve to annoy the surfer
except in very specific cases (some outlined in the Wikipedia entry
- see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pop-up_ad )

Also of interest, check out http://www.popuptest.com/ - this page
links to a variety of popups and lets you test your browser's /
blocker software's blocking functionality.

Tom Aman

Aman Software
http://www.cyberspyder.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Renee Kennedy
Subject: Pop-ups

Don't try to talk him out of it, instead, ask to run a test to see
if it will work.

When my bosses come up with new web marketing strategies, I never
poo poo their ideas.   It's always best to run a test, start slowly
and then build up to a more grand campaign, if the tests prove
worthy.

You could get data from other products and other companies, but that
data may not prove accurate for your company and your product.
Therefore, it's always best to test these things out.

Also, think of the experience that it will give you, put another
strategy under your belt!

Renee Kennedy


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: John Smart
Subject: pop ups and unders

I think we can all agree that no good ever came from a pop under.
(If it is so good, why hide it??)

I now use pop-over's. They are terribly cool! It is borderline AJAX,
and basically opens an iFrame that appears above the page. It isn't
hard to learn, and is both powerful and cool looking.

I use it on a lot of sites - anywhere I would use a pop up, or want
the link to keep the guest focused on the main site, yet get that
nugget of data.

Visit: http://jquery.com/demo/thickbox/

Now, there is a bit of a learning curve for downloading all the
code! I had a real hard time getting it, then it had the wrong name,
so I had to rename the file (which concerned me a little). It is so
worth it! Unless you are expecting i-Phone traffic - it stalls the
i-Phone browser and you have to reload the page to keep going! I am
sure patches will soon be available.

On a similar note, I just got a Wii! Lots of fun, you should get one
- however, you can (with a US$5 download) browse the internet with
it. It works very well, but should we design for this target? So far
I have used it to look at houses, look up data about games, and
order a pizza. Not sure if there are any potential emerging markets
here? Any of you seen Safari Wii on your stats files? (It is a
version of Safari that is available for it!)

John Smart
InternetDesign.com
A Human Touch in a Digital world.


============ Sponsor Message ===========

Want a fresh pizza delivered?  Call Domino's.  Want
some fresh web content?  Visit GetWebContent.com.

We deliver fresh, we deliver fast and, unlike Domino's,
every pizza copy we bake is different.  We custom
write it to fill your order and then burn the recipe.

After that it's all yours to use on one site or 1,000 sites.
www.GetWebContent.com/LED fresh, fast and only for you.

============ Sponsor Message ===========


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Martyn Gay
Subject: 2nd domain

> ... it would be just a variant of the same domain name
> and inevitably we would have some of the same product
> lines on both sites would Google view this as duplication
> and penalise us?
        - Gillian Fernandez, LED Digest 2468
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1879/190/

We've constantly had SEO "experts" tell us (and worried clients)
that running separate but similar .co.uk and .com sites (or even
aliases on a single site) can lead to a penalty from Google for
duplication. The belief is therefore that Google penalises our sites
for doing exactly what they do - check out www.google.com and
www.google.co.uk - different but similar content!

Of course the reality is somewhat different. In its webmaster
guidelines, Google expressly suggests using a German .de domain for
German content!

http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66359

So what is more likely is that Google will only show what it
considers the most relevant of your 2 URLs to a particular user in
the search results. Again, in this article Google makes it clear
that it penalises only illegitimate duplicate content that is trying
to manipulate search results.

Matt Cutts (as an employee of Google) is always an excellent source
for an insight into Google's policies. I haven't found him quoted
directly on this, but I found this reference with some notes about
his contribution to a discussion on this topic.

http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/003398.html

-------------------------
"Matt Cutts - Google Not prepared, but informal remarks. High order
nits: what do people worry about? He often finds that honest
webmasters worry about dupe content when they don't need to. G tries
to always return the "best" version of a page. Some people are less
conscious. The person claimed he was having problems with dupe
content and not appearing in both G and Y. Turns out he had 2500
domains. A lot of people ask about articles split into parts and
then printable versions. Do not worry about G penalizing for this.
Different top level domains: if you own a .com and a .fr, for
example, don't worry about dupe content in this case."
-------------------------

The lesson from both these authoritative Google sources appears to
be clear... running similar sites for different country-specific
domains is legitimate, and won't be penalised (unless they detect
some type of illegitimate attempt to manipulate search engine
results). This one can be chalked up alongside the other SEO myths
that many SEO "experts" like to peddle.

Martyn Gay
Cactusoft Ltd
Shopping Cart Software
www.cactushop.com

<Moderator Comment>

An oft-cited page with information from Google on dupe content is
here:

Deftly dealing with duplicate content
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/12/deftly-dea...

-Adam


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Will Bontrager
Subject: 2nd domain

In response to the post by Gillian Fernandez.

Domain longevity may be a factor in search results positioning,
assuming the site is updated every so often. It may be worth keeping
the other domain if only for that reason.

If hosting expense is a consideration, the other domain might be
moved to a cheap hosting outfit.

To sidestep duplicate content issues, instead of catalog products,
the other domain might be populated with lingerie-related articles
-- literature about what determines quality (or trash), attitudes in
different parts of the world, what to wear in which circumstances to
create certain impressions or reactions. "Read in the privacy of
your home" PDF documents might be available for download. Articles
and documents would link back to the catalog domain.

Will Bontrager
http://BontragerCGI.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by:

GetWebContent.com
The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.
Free no-obligation proposal: http://GetWebContent.com/LED

SEOToolSet.com
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification
Join the certified SEO directory: www.SEOToolSet.com/training/

The Archives: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/126/189/

Subscribe: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/52/187/

Unsubscribe, Change Email, or Hold / Resume Delivery:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/category/4/17/201/

(c) Copyright 1995-2007 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Rebukes are easy from our betters,
From men of quality and letters;
But when low dunces will affront,
What man alive can stand the brunt?" - Jonathan Swift