Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2007 archives arrow LED Digest 2472: Google Doing SEO/M? Update
LED Digest 2472: Google Doing SEO/M? Update Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

www.GetWebContent.com/LED : the LED's Key Sponsor
 The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.

www.SEOToolSet.com/training/ : the LED's Premier Sponsor
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification

==================================================
List Moderator:                       Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
August 16, 2007                    Issue no. 2472
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW =====================

        --== Update: Google Competing for Clients ==--

                ~ Grant Crowell
"I hope people...will press Google for a public
disclosure of these activities..."


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Bandwidth Speeds ==--

                ~ Brad Waller
"I can confirm the speeds of fiber."

        --== LED Tagline Suggestions ==--

                ~ Eva Rosenberg
"Linking Expertise and Deftness"

                ~ Eric Ward
"Lotsa Eloquent Diatribes"

                ~ Barry Mills
"If you are gonna do it, do it once, and
do it right."

                ~ Dr.Mani
"Learn - Educate - Debate"

                ~ Joel Lesser
"...let's revisit why this discussion list
was named this way..."

                ~ John Audette
"I would change the name to the AMD - the
AudetteMedia Digest."

                ~ John Smart
"Let's Eat Devilcake"


========== NEW ===================================

From: Grant Crowell
Subject: Follow-up -- Google Competing for Video SEO/M

Hello LED-ucators. In LED #2460 [
http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1868/190/ ], I shared my
experience of how I lost the bid for the video search engine
marketing account with one of my clients to Google.

I said that it could become a potentially thorny issue for our
industry if Google themselves were competing in the video search
space by now offering to do optimization work for their own video
search engines, hence cutting out the middleman (i.e., the search
marketer). I felt this deserved an additional follow up with my
client to make sure what I was originally reporting on wasn't
misconstrued, and see if I could continue to do a responsible
inquiry while respecting my client's confidentiality.

I asked my client if they had received any new information from
Google proposal to do both the video production and video
optimization work -- particularly on who in Google would be
responsible for exactly what. Would it be Google's internal
departments? Subsidiaries of Google, operating with independency?
3rd party subcontractors? The following is the response I received:

-------------------
"We don't really know the answer to that question. We've talked to
several people, and it sounded like they were from different areas
of the company [Google], potentially other companies who were
working with Google, from our discussion [with them] on the phone;
and they assured us that they can do all this. We were just going to
wait until the videos were done and then talk about how that was all
going to work later, I guess."
-------------------

This follow-up conversation left me with the following thoughts:

- Google is definitely now offering video optimization work to
potential search marketing clients under their own brand name, and
not under the name of an acquired subsidiary. (Such as its
subsidiary search marketing company, Performics, which was
originally purchased by the ad firm DoubleClick, which was purchased
itself by Google.)

- It is unclear as to what video optimization work is being
performed internally by Google, Google's subsidiaries, or its
subcontractors.

- It is unclear as to the scope of video optimization work Google
promises to search marketing clients.

- It is unclear if any of the mentioned parties have insider access
to the workings of Google's video search engines (YouTube, Google
video, etc.), which would potentially create an unfair advantage in
the competitive video search marketing space

- Google has not been inclined to disclose any of these potentially
thorny industry issues with the client.

After having this conversation, I suggested to my client that if
they found such disclosure to be important to them, they should then
request from Google, in writing, a list of each of Google's internal
departments that would be handling each aspect of their video
project and the scope of their work. (Most especially, the
optimization work.) I told them that this was in their best
interests, so they could protect themselves from any hint of
impropriety. (That being said, the onus of responsibility in this
matter does not fall on the client.)

There is still the possibility that this could just be a big
miscommunication; or even if its not as innocent as that, just
another case of overpromising by people in Google's sales department
on what they are capable of doing, and allowed to do.

Regardless of what is the case, an explanation should now be
provided by the people in Google who are supposed to oversee this
activity. They have a responsibility to disclose how they are going
about offering their own video search marketing services, and to
address the concerns by search marketers that it may already be a
serious conflict of interest, one that could comprise both the
integrity of Google's search results and of our own profession.

I hope people attending the SES San Jose conference next week will
press Google for a public disclosure of these activities and remind
them that their matra of "Don't Be Evil," which might need to be
replaced in this case with, "Lead by Example."

Grant Crowell

Grantastic Designs, Inc.
http://www.grantasticdesigns.com


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Brad Waller
Subject: Bandwidth

> Apparently Verizon is spending billions... to
> upgrade their customers to fiber optics in the
> 30 states that they serve. Expected speeds
> are up to 30 mbps.
        - Tom Aman, LED Digest 2471
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1882/190/

I can confirm the speeds of fiber.  I switched from Cable (6 Mbps)
to Fiber (15 Mbps) months ago at home.  I rarely got close to the 6
Mbps rate with cable, most often seeing around 4 Mbps.  With the
switch to fiber I always see more than 10 Mbps, and sometimes over
15 Mbps.  In fact, my first test results were 15.019 Mbps down,
1.766 Mbps up.

The upload speed is the biggest advantage.  Sure you notice the
great download speed when you grab a big file or video stream, but
when I upload a few hundred megabyte file to our server, I really
notice the improvement over the cable speeds.  In fact, I have often
done uploads from home because it is faster than the office (shared
T1, around 1 Mbps both ways)!

Brad Waller
Manage and Sell your own site advertising
http://adjungle.com


============ Sponsor Message ===========

Blogging can improve your site's ranking
with both search engines and end users.

Now, would you like us to tell you something
you maybe don't already know?  OK.

A blog shouldn't be written like other web content.
Here's why. http://www.getwebcontent.com/blog/?p=16

http://GetWebContent.com/LED : Blogging are us.

============ Sponsor Message ===========


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Eva Rosenberg
Subject: LED

Hey Lorelle and Adam

Great idea.

I could get lost sitting here searching the Dictionary and the
Thesaurus and the web coming up with ideas.

But, starting with Lorelle's theme, how about

Listserve for E-Expansion and Development

Listserve for Entrepreneurs and Designers

Linking Expertise and Deftness

Leading Experts and Developers

Leading Effective Development

Once upon a time, your Humble Guide,

Eva Rosenberg, EA
www.taxmama.com
www.taxquips.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Eric Ward
Subject: LED

L  E  D  =

Loquacious Eruditeness Dispelled
Lotsa Eloquent Diatribes
Lunacy Every Day
Let's Educate Dumbassess

:)

-ew


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Barry Mills
Subject: LED

Hi Adam,

If you are going to change the name, my advice would be to ditch LED
completely and come up with something that has meaning today.

It's not a bad idea to come up with a new meaning for LED, and is
probably better than doing nothing. But it's a bit like coming up
with a new meaning for an acronym like USA. No matter how creative
you are, USA will always mean United States of America to most
people, and LED will always mean Light Emitting Diode to most
people. I think if you only change the official meaning of LED, it
won't feel like enough, and you'll want to make a bigger change
later. Too much chopping and changing and you risk the sort of
demise that happened to Adventive after a series of unsuccessful
rebrands (no offence Andy, wherever you are). If you are gonna do
it, do it once, and do it right.

Barry S Mills
Chairman
Netstep Corporate Communications
http://www.netstep.co.uk


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Dr.Mani Sivasubramanian
Subject: LED

'Learn - Educate - Debate'

Seems to fit the theme of what we do in here better ;)

I, of course, think of all members as LEaD'ers

A slight revision of name/brand could be:

Internet Business LEaDers

(IBL, the IBM of e-business?  Hmm.... :) )

and participants would be called 'Leaders', for brevity.

So if we have 'Leaders' in here, who are the followers?

Why, the REST of them, of course ;)

Think that's a powerful enough hook to get most to want to be on the
inside, looking out?!

Dr.Mani
http://www.CHDinfo.com/firesale/


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Joel Lesser
Subject: LED

Before we dispense with the classic "Link Exchange Digest" name,
lets first go back in time and revisit why this discussion list was
named this way (and Adam please correct me if I am wrong on some of
these details).

Way back in the late 90's when the LED first was started, many
websites were branding themselves through traditional link exchange
(and still do to this day).  The list at one time was owned by a
subsidiary of Microsoft, who still owns the linkexchange.com domain.

Personally, the "LED" name has never "irked" me... I like that the
list has retained the same principle name over all of these years.
Many of you know that this discussion list was one of the first of
it's kind - and still is thanks to those who regularly contribute to
it.

Of course, marketing methods evolve and now link exchange is one of
dozens of marketing methods available to web marketers today.

Before we dispense with the LED name, ask yourself if you would like
your favorite beverage to change names suddenly?  Marketing 101
instructs that there is lots to be said about product and brand name
recognition.  This is why major soft drink manufacturers make
changes to packaging very gradually.

Adam, if you do change the name of this list, I would like to
suggest that you maintain the LED title in conjunction with the new
title for some time.. similar to what IBM Thinkpad and Lenovo have
been doing for the past five years.

As for a new name?  Learn-Exchange-Discuss is fine with me!.. As
long as this list continues to allow discussions of all types of web
based marketing and development topics, I'll be happy with whatever
you end up calling it.

Joel Lesser
LinksManager.com
http://linksmanager.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: John Audette
Subject: LED

Greetings....

I "may" be a little biased, but I would change the name to the AMD -
the AudetteMedia Digest. The Link Exchange is obviously long gone,
but the Audette Internet brand lives on -- especially now that Adam
is actively building an Internet marketing business. I wonder how
long it will take him to build a company larger than Multimedia
Marketing Group?

Cheers,
John Audette


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: John Smart
Subject: LED

It could use some work - like TSB Bank in England - the TSB Stood
for Trustee Savings Bank - so it was TSB not TSB Bank (which,
annoyingly is Trustee Savings Bank Bank)

Let Everyone discuss
Oh, this isn't as easy as it looks!
Err,
List Everything Directly
Lets Eat Devilcake
Levitate (in) Electronic Directories

John Smart
InternetDesign.com
A Human Touch in a Digital world.


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by:

GetWebContent.com
The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.
Free no-obligation proposal: http://GetWebContent.com/LED

SEOToolSet.com
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification
Join the certified SEO directory: www.SEOToolSet.com/training/

The Archives: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/126/189/

Subscribe: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/52/187/

Unsubscribe, Change Email, or Hold / Resume Delivery:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/category/4/17/201/

(c) Copyright 1995-2007 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"The female that loves unrequited sleeps,
And the male that loves unrequited sleeps,
The head of the money-maker that plotted all day sleeps,
And the enraged and treacherous dispositions, all, all sleep."
- Walt Whitman