Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2007 archives arrow LED Digest 2499: Real Time Web Stats
LED Digest 2499: Real Time Web Stats Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

www.GetWebContent.com/LED : the LED's Key Sponsor
 The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.

www.SEOToolSet.com/training/ : the LED's Premier Sponsor
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification

==================================================
List Moderator:                       Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
September 25, 2007                   Issue no. 2499
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW ======================

        --== Real Time Web Stats ==--

                ~ Sandy Galvin
"We haven't been able to find alternative
services that provide this viewpoint."


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Customer Responsibility ==--

                ~ Jack Quinn
"...the customer has to submit to the final
cart stage to see the shipping charge."

                ~ Grant Crowell
"...make some design changes to your checkout
process that use best usability practices."

        --== XML Sitemaps ==--

                ~ Mark Rogers
"...they spend a significant amount of
bandwidth looking at an XML sitemap..."

                ~ Nathan Holley
"This is a ridiculous assertion."

        --== Password Logistics ==--

                ~ Al Toman
"Any system you devise can be over ridden."


=========== NEW ==================================

From: Sandy Galvin
Subject: Web Stats with Real Time Log

We use the expensive version of a subscription based web analytic
called "Freestats."  Their code appears on every page of our web
site.  This has been very useful to us, but recently has had lots of
outages that reduce our web site to a crawl.

At Christmas time this would be a disaster as customers are
impatient, and the only fix we have for now is to disable the
javascript links on all of our pages while we are waiting for the
service to be restored.  Sometimes it is a few hours before we
realize that we are effectively off-line.  And even when the service
is restored, there is no way of knowing for how long. Their support
service is unresponsive, so it becomes a crap shoot whether to
re-enable or not.

On the up side, the service includes a dandy log file listing in
real time that allows us to monitor visitors as they explore our web
site and to follow their movement from page to page.  We haven't
been able to find alternative services that provide this viewpoint.
Does anyone have a suggestion about services that provide a view of
the page-log files as the tracks occur?

Sandy Galvin
Barclay Blocks
http://www.barclaywoods.com


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Jack Quinn
Subject: Customer Responsibility

> While we are on the topic of customer service.... at
> what point does the customer take responsibility for
> a positive transaction? ... How do you get customers
> to read a short paragraph to inform them of their options?
        - Liz Ross, LED Digest 2498
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1910/190/

I took a look at your site and was intruiged at your product
selections. Note - it took me ten tries in order to bring up the
shopping cart page because everything I clicked on in the first nine
tries was out of stock or discontinued.  Anyways, I found something
finally to order and got to the page with the instructions that you
say no one ever looks at.

Here are my thoughts:

a) When I got to this page, my thought process was that I wanted to
submit in order to see what the final cost would be for shipping.
Nowhere do I see a shipping cost chart; the customer has to submit
to the final cart stage in order to see the shipping charge. By that
time, no doubt, they have not read your paragraph on the two tier
system. I think one of the reasons that happens is that the shipping
choice selection submission button is above the instructions. If
this paragraph is vital for them to read, make them read it visually
before they get to the section to choose shipping options and submit.

b) general comment regarding the shipping options. What value is my
putting in my zip code at this stage if no dynamic shipping options
appear? I put in my zip code, it says "United States", but yet you
still give me two "Worldwide-Non US" shipping choices and then give
me an error when I pick one to see what the rate would be. Don't
display the choice if it isn't valid based on the zip code.
Interestingly, you do have a canadian shipping option that appeared
for a US zip code entered as well, but the zip code field doesn't
look like you can enter a canadian postal code.

c) since there are so many "out of stock" and "discontinued" items
in your catalog, I'm guess the problem people are having is if they
order a few items and they pick the "ship it all at once" option,
then you keep the order all together, as the items trickle in to
your warehouse (which I'm guessing could be over weeks or months,
you actually charge their credit card for an item that has moved
into stock (but not shipped to the customer) and conceivably a
customer who is waiting for that elusive item to finally appear in
your warehouse in order for you to ship the entire order may just
receive a credit card statement with several items charged for which
they did not receive. Then when they call to complain about the
charges for items they never received and you tell them it might be
months for some item to appear in stock so you can ship the whole
thing to them, they say, cancel the order and then you hit them with
the 15% restocking fee for cancelling an order that never shipped
and never left your warehouse?

Hard to say what the answer is for that one. Since your shipping
policies and restocking fees are not shall we say consumer friendly,
I would put that disclosure on a separate form and make them accept
or deny in order to put the order through.  The way it is now, I can
see even though the typeface is huge that they don't read it because
they click thru that page in order to see the shipping cost.

d) in the economy processing section you have a sentence: "These is
only one shipping per order. " I think you want to say: "There is
only one shipping per order. "

e) in my sample order with a us zip code - I was presented with five
shipping choices. Three of them resulted in errors because they were
for non-us destinations. Of the two resulting, UPS Ground was $9.52
and US Priority Mail was $9.22. Both of them don't sound that fast.
Yet 2 of the 3 non-us shipping charges that appear have words that
sound faster "Expedited" and "Express". How come when you live in
the US your shipping is regular and not express?

Regards,
Jack Quinn


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Grant Crowell
Subject: Customer Responsibility

Liz, I don't think you're asking quite the right question, since a
checkout process for your customers is about your web interface, its
about their ease of use and understanding, not what you think
they're doing "wrong." It's evident that they want to make the
purchase, but your site isn't clear enough for them to understand
which option they really want. What you should do is make some
design changes to your checkout process that use best usability
practices. Here are several suggestions I would offer:

-- Make your a/b choices (i.e., your delivery options) stand out
better. Right now they simply appear as mostly plain text that
appears below the checkout box, which makes them easy to ignore.
What would be preferable is some graphic text and image for that can
better distinguish each of the choices for your audience, and have
it alongside the drop down menu you have for each choice.

-- On your drop-down menu, list the range of days for each delivery
method. Simply putting "Economy" and "Expedited" doesn't tell enough
about when a customer should expect their order.

-- Follow up the website transaction with an email transaction
confirmation of their purchase, prominently state what shipping
selection they made, and include a link back to their order should
they wish to change the shipping selection or any other info, before
it is scheduled to ships out. (Do give them an expected ship date /
time as well)

It's good that you have repeat customers who like the process you
already have in place, and you can still appease them with keeping a
simple interface, while at the same time, making it more helpful for
your new customers.

Grant Crowell
Grantastic Designs, Inc.
http://www.grantasticdesigns.com


========= Begin Sponsor Message =========

Autumn Leaves Must Fall, But Not Your PR

Seasons change. How about your site's copy?
When was the last time you added or updated
your content to make it more end-user useful
and search-engine succulent?

Customers and search bots want fresh meat.
www.GetWebContent.com/LED, we deliver the beef.

========== End Sponsor Message ==========


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Mark Rogers
Subject: Sitemap submissions

> Regardless of what they say (or don't!),
> Google does not like site maps.
        - Ivan Jimenez, LED Digest 2494
        - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1906/190/

Well for something Google doesn't like, they spend a significant
amount of bandwidth looking at an XML sitemap I recently created.

The first day they were hitting it every minute alternating between
it and some other page on my site. Now they hit every few hours.
When I submit it, Google uploads it within a few minutes. If I don't
submit it, Google appears to be uploading about once a day.

I currently have 148 pages indexed and the new sitemap I created has
297 pages. I will be curious to see what happens over the long run.
I suspect that like keywords in the meta keyword tag,  if you don't
give Google some other reason to index a page besides just listing
it in the sitemap, they won't since even Google can't index every
website let alone every page on every website.

Cheers,

Mark Rogers
http://www.framedestination.com/


-------- new post - same topic ---------

From: Nathan Holley
Subject: Sitemaps - yeah Google hates 'em!

> Google does not like site maps.
        - Ivan Jimenez

We've got a contender for moronic comment of the year here! (Only
kidding - Ivan you're not a moron by any stretch. But this comment
is so false...)

This is a ridiculous assertion. Google "doesn't like sitemaps,"
folks. And are we clear that we're speaking of XML sitemaps here
(like it makes any difference)? Let's examine that:

- Google pours resources into their Webmaster Central program. In
fact, they have escalated it steadily since it started (as Google
Sitemaps) awhile ago. They're about to unroll a brand new version of
the console.

- Google, along with MSN, Yahoo, and Ask, have announced their
partnership in the Sitemaps.org project. Together they've achieved a
standard that allows webmasters to place the Sitemap: directive in
their robots.txt file to achieve automagical discovery.

- What started as a simple console to submit an XML feed and have
shortcuts to server errors, search queries, indexing stats, etc, has
evolved into a sophisticated backend that every webmaster should be
leveraging. The backlink profile information is impressive - still
not on par with Yahoo Search Explorer but getting better. I think
Google's being purposively careful about including too much info
about backlinks (they're famously opaque on this issue, since it
makes them so vulnerable to SEO - wanna rank a site quick? Start
with the links. Wanna find out why a site ranks? Start with the
links.)

These points make your statement obviously false, Ivan. I don't mean
to pick on you, but come on - let's clear the FUD shall we? (Fear
Uncertainty and Doubt)

Now, to be clear with LEDers -- I don't always recommend submitting
a XML file. Verify your site in Webmaster Central and use the tools.
Unless you have a dynamic site or lots of different content that's
not getting indexed well, pass on the sitemap.

Nathan Holley


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Al Toman
Subject: Member areas

> Have a "Product Users Area" on my website.
> Only people who have bought the product can use it.
        - Richard Graham, LED Digest 2498

Richard,

Any system you devise can be over ridden.  One way I would suggest
is to have the users enter the UPC code of the product.  I'm
assessing that the product is a book, of sorts.  The UPC is
typically found on the back cover (sleeve).

I do not know what you are asking regarding the use of user names in
forums, not.  Can't help you there.

Al Toman
studio9 web design


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by:

GetWebContent.com
The Web's Most Experienced SEO Content Providers.
Free no-obligation proposal: http://GetWebContent.com/LED

SEOToolSet.com
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification
Join the certified SEO directory: www.SEOToolSet.com/training/

The Archives: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/126/189/

Subscribe: http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/52/187/

Unsubscribe, Change Email, or Hold / Resume Delivery:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/category/4/17/201/

(c) Copyright 1995-2007 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Do not judge by appearances; a rich heart may be under a poor
coat." - Scottish Proverb