Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2008 Archives arrow LED Digest 2582: New Guest Moderator
LED Digest 2582: New Guest Moderator Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

http://www.WillMaster.com/Master : the LED's Key Sponsor
Master Series Software - Get Connected with Your WebSite

http://www.SEOToolSet.com/training/ : the LED's Premier Sponsor
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification

==================================================
Guest Moderator:                     Published by:
Nathan Holley                          LED Digest
nate, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
February 4, 2008                    Issue no. 2582
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== CONTINUING =================

    <Guest Moderator>
        ~ I'm steering this ship now!

    --== Clients Providing Crap Content ==--

        ~ Marty R. Milette
"...we must always weigh our moral obligations
against our obligations as business owners."

        ~ Maty Matyszak
"It's their website, and I'm being paid to
give them what they want."

        ~ Michael Linehan
"...the client is not always right."

    --== Are Content Management Systems Worth It? ==--

        ~ Sandra Combs
"Drupal has more features for SEO..."

        ~ Brett Atkin
"How do you price that [Jeremy Weiss]?"

     --== 2008 Marketing Predictions ==--

         ~ Dirk Johnson
"My goal here is get business owners to take
control of their own SEO efforts."


======== CONTINUING ===============================

<Guest Moderator>

Alright LEDers, I'm steering this ship now! That's right, so sit back
and get ready for a ride. Time for a bit of change around here - sorry
Adam you're a good bloke but take a rest! :)

In all honesty, I'm thrilled to moderate this list for a bit. Adam gets
his break (he must be half-crazy after 10 odd years of this lot), and I
get to self-promote! LOL kidding again, as LEDers are probably aware I
don't do any sort thing - much more satisfied in being behind the
scenes.

So any words of advice for me? Any warnings? Send whatever you've got -
here's a proper email addy for ya: This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

Things will work the same - send in posts and I'll post 'em.

Let's have some fun.

Nathan Holley

--------------------

From: Marty R. Milette
Subject: Professionalism

In business, we must always weigh our moral and legal obligations as
'professionals' against our obligations as business owners. Sometimes,
the two are in direct conflict. (The company I was working for was once
asked by a certain 'Willie C.' to take on the off-shore software
development job of creating a 'clone' of a certain Custom Toolbar
product - strangely, the inquiry vanished when he found out he was
actually asking us to clone our own product!)

As a professional, we have the obligation to tell our clients when they
wish to do something that is not right. (Morally, legally, business-wise
or otherwise.) But as business owners, we should always recognize that
while the customer is NOT always right, they are still the customer and
always (hopefully) pays the bills, which helps us meet our obligations
to our business, partners, shareholders and families.

We can, and certainly should advise the customer when their actions are
morally or legally wrong - and can leave it at that - but in should we
put a big pout on, turn away work and take our name off any association
with a site just because the customer insists on the 'pumpkin' color
scheme?

In some cases the customer may indeed be right - perhaps the target
market actually prefers an orange background with purple text? Who
knows?!

Sometimes it is best to make lemonade out of the lemons by making your
opinion known, helping the customer do what they want to do (if you're
morally comfortable with it) and then use it as an opportunity. Say to
the client after some time, hey, let's try an experiment and see if a
different color scheme improves the statistics. In most cases, the
client will be curious enough to try - and, assuming you did your design
right (CSS?), such changes can be done quickly and easily and the
results will most likely be in your favor.

Marty R. Milette
http://hotel-club.net


========= Begin Sponsor Message =========

One Way Links to your Site, by the Hundreds? Yes!

Get Traffic and Link Popularity to Your Site
from Legitimate, General Interest Web Directories.

DomainDrivers Makes It Hassle-Free. Details Here:
http://www.domaindrivers.com/directory-submissions.html

========== End Sponsor Message ==========


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Maty Matyszak
Subject: Professionalism

> Sometimes I find myself thinking, "Are you
> serious?". Most of the time I speak up
> (successfully and unsuccessfully), but
> sometimes it just isn't worth the effort.
    - Brett Atkin

We don't do a lot of design work, and often move projects on to wherever
we feel designer and client are better suited to each other. We also
make it clear before we start what we are doing - website building or
consultancy. If it's website building, and a client has a clear vision
what he wants for the site, then its our job to make that vision
reality. (I say he, but some of those with the most rigid views have
been women.)

I might think that the idea and the taste shown on the site are both
appalling, but that's not my decision. For all I know, the site might be
cunningly designed to appeal to people with bad taste. And someone
designing a home page for Google in the 1990s might have protested
bitterly that the design was all wrong for a portal, when the fact that
it was radically at odds with accepted convention was partly what made
Google such a success. In short, something might be bloody idiocy
(probably) or a stroke of genius (who knows?) but unless I'm being well
paid to comment, I won't. It's their website, and I'm being paid to give
them what they want.

About seven years ago someone came to us wanting his site 'improved'. We
offered what we considered a tasteful, user-friendly design and he
rejected it with horror. Another designer came up with what he wanted -
a monster filled with cheesy clip art, frenetic anigifs and even a bit
of flashing text. I've just checked it in Alexa, and its still got the
same schlock and doing pretty well. The man evidently knew his market
better than we did. Moral of the story - don't second-guess the client
unless he wants you to and is paying for it.

Maty Matyszak


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Michael Linehan
Subject: Client is always right

> But The client is always right. Sometimes
> annoying, shortsighted, ill-informed, badly
> worded, aesthetically endowed like a dead
> slug, talentless in marketing and design,
> but always right :)
    - John Smart, LED 2581
    - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1996/190/
    
> ... the customer is always right. No matter
> how bad we think their grammar, business
> model or heaven forbid, Microsoft Word Art
> & clipart happen to be, they came to us
> with what they want on THEIR website.
    - Lori Smart, LED 2581

I understand what you are both saying, but, with all respect, I'd like
to suggest that the client is not always right.

I think there comes a time when we have to say, "Sorry, I'm not willing
to take your money, because:

- no-one is looking for what you offer

- your design is incredibly awful and, from my professional experience,
I think it will make you little or no money

- your copy is meaningless and couldn't sell water to someone dying of
thirst

- that is simply not enough money for me to do enough work to gain you
any web presence worth speaking of

- your business sector is extremely competitive and you are going to
need to invest a lot more thought, time and money if you want to make
any headway against the established players

- and so on.

Personally, I won't take money from someone, if I think that what they
want will not serve them. And if I don't think they are right, I will
tell them so.

Mind you, a difference is that I am one of those Internet business
consultants. Still, people will sometimes approach us just to build a
site. If I think they are making a mistake, my framework obliges me to
say so --- whether or not they came asking for advice.

Michael Linehan, Marketing Alchemy
www.marketing-alchemy.com


========= Begin Sponsor Message =========

Latest addition => Spam Resistant PHP Form

           WebSite's Secret

Members area access to a collection
of Will Bontrager's handy web tools.

http://www.willmaster.com/AreaSecret

========== End Sponsor Message ==========


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Sandra Combs
Subject: CMS Systems, Boon or Bane?

> Drupal is very similar, and many of the
> same features are available on both Drupal
> and Joomla. From my use, Drupal seems to be
> the programmers version, and Joomla is
> easier for the less technical. Drupal seems
> to be more SEO friendly.
    - Brad Waller, LED 2850
    - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1995/190/

I have used both Drupal and Joomla (on Unix systems, not IIS) and have a
lot of experience doing things from "scratch".  I would agree that
Drupal is more of a programmer's system and that Joomla is easier (not
simple) for non-programmers to use to add content to their site.
Clients who want to maintain their own site without knowing HTML and CSS
find Joomla easier to learn, but I must provide that training.  Any time
they want a new feature added, I do that work. But clients like the
control of being able to put up new links, articles, photos without
having to contact (and pay) me.  That is fine with me because I can
spend my time on doing more challenging work and getting new clients.

Drupal, in my opinion, has more features for SEO and accessibility, and
just more control for the developer in general.  It is more complicated
than Joomla, but I have found it to be more modifiable and configurable.
I have changed source code in both systems to get exactly what I want,
but again, I find more to work with in Drupal.

All the modules both systems offer make it possible to add various
features quickly without having to program them myself, and that makes
clients happy. Because both have active user groups, most bugs get found
and solved. In general, I prefer Drupal if I am going to do most of the
work on the site. I'd probably choose Joomla for a client that wants to
do the maintenance.

Sandra Combs
http://www.webspertise.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Brett Atkin
Subject: CMS

Jeremy [Weiss],

You said the following...

> I can roll out a fully configured Drupal
> install in a few hours; which can be a very
> large savings compared to having to roll my
> own system.

How do you price that?  The client is getting 5,10,15 thousand dollars
worth of features/functionality and it took you 5 hours to install.
You have to account for documentation, education and any customization
you add (additional time I imagine), but the cost will still be
significantly less than the "value" you just gave the client.

Thanks.
Brett Atkin 


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Dirk Johnson
Subject: Predictions

> This is not rocket science but neither is
> it something that the average business
> operator has time to do over the long haul
> IF they are in a competitive vertical.
    - Michael Martinez, LED 2579
    - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/1994/190/

I actually agree with many of the main points in your blog post [
http://tinyurl.com/2smfjl {seo-theory.com}], even if some of it is
unflattering toward me. The only objection I have is that you think I am
doing all of this to self-promote. If I were, I'd certainly take a very
different tack. In my last post here, as well as several other ones
recently, I did not even mention reciprocation or our own services.

I, too, have no doubt that a genuine, experienced SEO consultant can
guide a client to better rankings. Michael, you said: "That's where an
SEO who does the research and watches the results makes a difference."
You're right. They can. They should.

My goal here is get business owners to TAKE CONTROL of their own SEO
efforts. Stop treating these SEO people as if they are wizards behind
the curtain. That's what many of them WANT us to buy into. Then they can
charge more if they have you convinced that only they have some kind of
secret sauce.

I want business owners to realize that average people can grasp the
basic concepts (and even many of the finer points) of search
optimization in a very short amount of time, if they apply themselves to
it. With that foundation, they can enlist the services of a REAL SEO
pro, and they'll have the knowledge to differentiate between that and
the pervasive flim flam.

Again, Michael, I have recently reviewed dozens of real world examples
where real estate agents (and business owners in a few other industries)
had hired an SEO consultant at substantial cost and came away with
little to show for it. This is not just one or two isolated cases here
or there. I am seeing DOZENS of cases. The client certainly DID NOT hire
a consultant that "does the research and watches the results". They
didn't even get thorough keyword analysis and proper page optimization
in the first place. Then they were ignored. From what I have seen, this
appears to be a pervasive problem in the SEO industry.

In one particularly egregious case, the client paid for "SEO services"
from their webmaster/hosting service, and got NOTHING at all. NOTHING.
When the client called them out, they said "you are the first one that
has complained!". I guess the other clients simply assumed that the SEO
work was being done. The hosting service pocketed every dime that their
client's had spent on SEO services, and did nothing. That service has
thousands of clients, but I don't know how many bought the "SEO
package".

Then there are the consultants in this industry that seem to try to tell
clients that they need a Ferrari to get groceries, or else their ice
cream might melt before they get home. All because the profit margin on
a selling a Ferrari is much better than on a mini-van. They use the
argument that the search engines have changed substantially and continue
to change constantly, so only a complicated, expensive strategy will
prevent people from passing your mini van on the information super
highway.

Michael, even you refer to these people in your article, when you
mentioned "the ridiculous mob compulsion to applaud every lengthy blog
post that claims some sudden break-through in knowledge with accolades
and praise." You are right, the sky seems to be falling every day in
some corners of the SEO world. Many of us have learned to ignore it.

Michael, again, as I have said over and over in every post I have made
here, there are good SEO consultants in this world, and their advice is
worth having. We provide services to several of them. There are others
that I do respect that post here to the LED Digest.

In my opinion, they are the ones that guide the client in a very
structured way. They cover the basics thoroughly, before they embark on
some kind of expensive "bleeding edge" program. They do what works for
the least cost first, and then add to that, if necessary or warranted.
To me, that is what defines professional behavior in this industry. They
are the ones who will get referrals going forward, based on past
results, at a fair price. They'll likely even grow their business into
this economy.

The predators have had their time in the sun. They thrived during a time
when clients were naive about all of this. But that is changing, very
quickly. Not due to "industry standards" but due to the fact that
clients are becoming better educated, burned from experience, and they
are far less willing to just buy any old "SEO package" and then sit back
and see what happens.

But the big party in SEO is coming to a crashing end. Firms that relied
on their ability to sell more sizzle than steak might just find a very
limited market for sizzle, going forward. Their constant clucking that
"the sky is falling" is starting to ring hollow to a lot of buyers.

The ONLY way that a business owner can assure that they are getting the
right kind of SEO service is to self-educate. Understand the basics,
then, if necessary, hire someone who will execute properly. By and
large, doing that alone works wonders. A real pro should be able to do
it better than the business owner. If the need for more refined services
arises, the business owner can hire an advisor who will guide them.
There is a place for that, and it warrants professional rates.

Michael, you seemed to want to take me to task for some reason, but we
actually seem to agree on nearly every point.

Best regards,
Dirk Johnson
DomainDrivers LLC
www.domaindrivers.com


(c) Copyright 1995-2008 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

No quotes while Nathan's in charge, sorry.