Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2008 Archives arrow LED Digest 2603: SEO Ain't Rocket Science
LED Digest 2603: SEO Ain't Rocket Science Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

http://www.WillMaster.com/Master : the LED's Key Sponsor
Master Series Software - Get Connected with Your WebSite

http://www.SEOToolSet.com/training/ : the LED's Premier Sponsor
Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification

==================================================
Guest Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                           LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
March 7, 2008                   Issue no. 2603
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....

====== NEW ======================

    --== SEO is not Rocket Science ==--

        ~ Brad Waller
"It looks like I'll be moderating a panel
at OMMA Global next week..."

    --== Tracking Marketing Progress ==--

        ~ Shaun Johnston
"...my dream of reproducing my work life
in an accessible form of journal."


==== CONTINUING =================

    --== What to Charge? ==--

        ~ Bill Wade
"I'd be a bit careful of paid text links."

        ~ Renee Kennedy
"...this write up on banner advertising
may help with [Nick's] pricing..."

    --== Lurkers ==--

        ~ Barry S Mills
"...if you think you have nothing useful
to contribute, please think again."

        ~ Chris Nielsen
"Perhaps Adam should remove ALL personal info
and any links that [are] self-promotional?"

        ~ Meg
"Yes, I too am a Lurker..."

        ~ Brigitte Burchett
"...I almost feel like I know some of you personally..."


========= NEW =====================================

From: Brad Waller
Subject: New post - Questions for a Panel

Hey all.  It looks like I'll be moderating a panel at OMMA Global next
week called "SEO is Not Rocket Science, but that Doesn't Mean It's Easy"
and I'm sure the folks here might have some interesting questions I can
have in my back pocket to ask.  The audience there is not the same as
here, but I bet after all the debates we've had we can come up with some
good ones.

So, what are the top questions people have?

Brad Waller
Manage and Sell your own site advertising
http://adjungle.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Shaun Johnston
Subject: Tracking keyword progress

Invited to fill some empty space, I report on my "progress" in SEM in
Adwords.

Google charges me an average of 45 cents per visit sent me. Google
claims to send me 20% more visits than I register receiving, so I
increase Google's charge by 20%. My average cost is therefore about 54
cents.

I in turn charge pay-per-click for visits I send my clients. On average
I earn 35 cents. So on visits I "buy" from Google I make only 65%. If
visitors from Google on average visit my site more than once I could
call that successful customer acquisition, but I can't afford to wait
for the return on my investment. So I am aiming at driving my return on
those visits into more than they cost me.

This puts me in the classic situation of trying to increase the return I
get from Google visits from 65% of cost to 100% and more. The problem is
primarily that too many visitors generate no return at all. I have
defined my problem as needing to increase the quality of my visitors.

First step, move down into third place or lower, to improve the
conversion rate. In Adwords turn off all channels except Google search.
Then, the slow grind of improving return from individual keywords, ads
and landing pages.

That lands me in a record-keeping nightmare of monthly re-analysis of
results for each keyword.  To me, this is not an Excel-kind of
challenge, a lot of what I want to record is text, including ad layouts.

I have adopted a wiki. I am keeping a page for each group of keywords,
that I can update each month, leaving notes about what to watch out for
next month. I am using pbwiki.com (free version), which uses regular
html controls for text (if you use explorer or Firefox) instead of
wiki-commands. I can create tables for detailed number-tracking. I can
copy and paste into and in from Word, with formatting.

And I'm so impressed I am making this wiki a record of my entire
business (adding equity to it?), and procedures of all kinds. And I've
made this wiki my default page in Explorer, so it's always open.

This is the closest I'm come to my dream of reproducing my work life in
an accessible form of journal.

Shaun Johnston


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Bill Wade
Subject: Ad rates

> ... a gift basket company wants to place a
> text ad on the home page and one interior
> page. And I have no idea what to charge...
> Is there some kind of equation with which I
> can calculate the price of the ad?
    - Nick Usborne, LED 2602
    - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/2017/190/

I'd be a bit careful of paid text links. Anecdotally, it's my
understanding that they may lead to a site's downgrading on Google.

Anyone else aware of this.

Thanks,
Bill Wade
about-air-compressors.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Renee Kennedy
Subject: Ad rates

I realize that Nick is asking about a text ad, but this write up on
banner advertising may help with his pricing:

The cost of banner advertising is normally calculated by impression
(also called “page view”).  An impression is how many times that banner
is seen by visitors. One person may see the banner more than one time
and that is included in the impression count.

The cost is usually determined by CPM or cost per 1,000 impressions.

In the healthcare industry, decent costs may range from $10 CPM
impressions to $75 CPM impressions.

You will pay higher prices for more targeted web pages.  For instance,
if you are considering a banner campaign for Nurses, it would be much
more beneficial for you to advertise on a site or a web page that has
content that will attract Nurses.  It would be less beneficial to
advertise on a network of health-related websites.  Even though you
might get a lot more impressions, these impressions are not as good if
they are not reaching the right kind of people.  Therefore, it is only
natural that you will pay a lot more for more targeted sites or pages.

The placement of the ad will also affect price.  Anything above-the-fold
should have a higher CPM.

Hence an ad targeting nurses that is at the top of a web page that
attracts nurses, could cost $45 per 1,000 impressions.  An ad that is
below the fold, might cost $25 per 1,000 impressions.  An ad that is on
a page that is a general health page, not specifically to do with
nurses, that is below the fold, might cost $10.

These are just general estimates, you would need to come up with your
own rates based on content, targeting, and traffic.

Renee Kennedy


========= Begin Sponsor Message =========

      Inexpensive Content Rotator

Rotate any part of a page. Or even the whole page.

       ~ Image
       ~ Headline
       ~ Leading paragraph
       ~ Special pricing

Content Carousel - http://www.willmaster.com/carousel

========== End Sponsor Message ==========


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Barry Mills
Subject: Lurker

Doug, the now-outed former lurker, raises an interesting point.

> I suspect many lurkers are small business
> owners like myself that earn their living
> from work other than SEO, web design, web
> marketing, etc.
>
> I have no basis for posting advice on the
> subjects discussed on LED
    - Douglas Bates

I wonder how many others reading the list feel this way. The "subjects
discussed" are whatever anyone discusses. Adam may correct me, but I
don't think there's any rules. There certainly isn't one that says you
have to be a web-head to post!

Those of us who do post regularly and work in those kind of areas try
and help people like Doug out a bit. We don't want a medal, let's not
pretend there is no self interest - we do it because it gets us known,
because it tests our opinions against peers, and because we learn from
the debates - or some of those reasons anyway. But the only way we can
hit those goals on a discussion list is by helping people out and giving
something of value from time to time, otherwise no-one would read. And,
speaking personally, when you've been on a list a long time you do feel
a sense of community, and I do put some time in now and again just
because I feel someone needs a helping hand, or because Adam's short of
material, or maybe because it's better than working.

For anyone out there who is running or working in a business that
consumes, rather than provides, digital marketing - if you think you
have nothing useful to contribute, please think again. Questions are
welcome, they spark discussion, and they help professionals understand
what kind of problems people "client-side" might need help with, so just
asking for help is contributing.

Also, when you read or hear stuff you don't understand, or you've just
been pitched at by some SEO or developer or agency that turned you right
on/off, tell us about your experiences. We're not on this list to sell,
but when we're not on the list many of us need to sell to people in our
own areas just like you, so any tips you can give us would be really
welcome.

Give, then take, ... or take, then give - I don't think it matters, but
everyone can do a bit of both.

Barry S Mills
Chairman
Netstep
http://www.netstep.co.uk


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Chris Nielsen
Subject: Lurker

> Personally, the digest got too personal.
> Bad vibes. Further, the ideas are far too
> scattered. Too many posts seemed selfish
> (insert my link here) or dominated.
    - Salem Kashou, LED Digest 2601
    - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/2016/190/

Thanks for being so honest. I was a little surprised to read your
comments, but I'm sure I have contributed to what you are feeling. At
times I see things touted that I know are opinion, yet they are stated
as fact. I try to debunk such things without getting personal, but I may
not always sound as calm and professional as I would like.

I have a proposal, but I fear if it was implemented that it would kill
off the list in time: Perhaps Adam should remove ALL personal
information and any links that could be seen as self-promotional? Any
posts that are directed to a person and not a topic could be excluded.
We might have an idea who the poster was, but there would be nothing to
confirm their identity.

This would not diminish my activity on the list, and in fact I once
suggested something along these lines to Adam. But I think it would
offend others and without any personal benefit would cause them to lose
interest.

On the other hand, it may encourage many lurkers to start posting, since
no one aside from Adam would know who they were.

I can't agree with the idea that the ideas/topics are "too scattered".
That has been the nature of the list from the beginning and I think it's
that variety that keeps many of us from becoming board by exposing us to
new topics and viewpoints.

Thank you,
Chris Nielsen
AnotherSelfPromotionalLink.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Meg
Subject: A Lurker Revealed

Yes, I too am a Lurker, I think I posted a few times a few years ago.
But life is ever changing, some projects go on the back burner and some
wander in and take over!

I have found some tips very useful, some stuff is past my needs and
knowledge.

I hope to get one project off the back burner and expect the tips and
info from here to be a help.

Later
Meg


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Brigitte Burchett
Subject: Lurker

Hi Adam and All!

Yes, I am one of those lurkers and have been for many, many years. I
almost feel like I know some of you personally, but I think my last post
was about 6 years ago.

The expertise and knowledge in this group always amazes me and, frankly,
intimidates me a bit  ;-))

It always seems the better part of valor to keep my mouth shut, so my
limited knowledge does not show.

It is hard to imagine that those of us that are not full-time
developers, marketers, etc would have anything to contribute that could
be of value, but we forget (imho) that many lurkers are beginners
looking for even the most rudimentary knowledge.

That is, after all, how I came to this group many years ago. Maybe, by
stepping back and realizing there are most likely folks lurking in the
wood work that are new to business on the internet we can draw more of
them into the discussion.

In that vain, here are some resources I have come to depend on for
dependable insight, knowledge and if nothing else, thought provoking
content:

1) Justin Cutroni's Blog: A lot of "how to" for Google Analytics, Advertising, etc.
http://www.epikone.com/blog/

2) sphinn Internet Marketing Discussion Forum
http://sphinn.com/

3) Matt McGee's Small Business SEM Blog
http://www.smallbusinesssem.com/

Brigitte Burchett
www.pondmarket.com


(c) Copyright 1995-2008 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"We are hidden in ourselves, like a truth hidden in isolated facts. When
we know that this One in us is One in all, then our truth is revealed."
- Rabindranath Tagore