| LED Digest 2686: Browser Size vs Resolution |
|
|
|
==================================================
The LED Digest
Moderated Discussion List "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997" Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom http://www.AudetteMedia.com : the LED's Publisher The Internet Marketing Boutique: SEO, SEM, Social Media http://www.SEOToolSet.com/training/ : the LED's Premier Sponsor Bruce Clay's Search Engine Optimization Training & Certification ================================================== List Moderator: Published by: Adam Audette LED Digest adam, led-digest.com http://www.led-digest.com .............................................. July 29, 2008 Issue no. 2686 .............................................. .....IN THIS DIGEST..... ==== CONTINUING ================= --== Design Resolution & Sizing ==-- ~ Will Bontrager "...consult statistics of browser window size in addition to screen resolution." ~ Karl L. Baldwin "I am incredulous that I never see anyone other than myself...design websites with auto-wrap." ~ Tom Aman "You are equating screen resolution with browser window size..." ======== CONTINUING =============================== From: Will Bontrager Subject: Resolution > The trend sure seems to be more and more > people these days are using a higher > resolution, with 45% using 1024 x 768 and a > low 7% using 800 x 600. - Robert Joy, LED 2683 - http://www.led-digest.com/content/view/2098/190/ It may be prudent to consult statistics of browser window size in addition to screen resolution. I, and several others I am associated with, do not run the browser window full screen. We like to have other application windows visible. A browser window 800 pixels wide will have scrollbars at the bottom of wider web pages, even with an umpteen zillion pixel screen resolution. Will Bontrager http://www.willmaster.com/ -------- new post - same topic -------- From: Karl Baldwin Subject: Resolution Over the years, I have, from time to time, read on many different forums, these discussions on designing websites for a particular resolution. I am incredulous that I never see anyone other than myself who has always (10 + years) designed websites with auto-wrap. The advantages, seems to me to be conspicuously and intuitively obvious. Regardless of any viewer's screen size or resolution settings, my sites will display all of the pages content, up to 100% of each monitor's viewing width, with no side scrolling - on anybody's computer screen. The disadvantages? The only one I can think of is that a monitor with very high resolution (mine is 1200 x 1600) will have lengthy lines of text. However, I have never once found that to be an issue either from website owners or visitors (up to 1200 visitors per hour) on my website in over 10 years. Therefore I find all this wringing-of-hands and gnashing-of-teeth over designing for a specific resolution to be a bogus criteria laid down as the gospel by some well meaning "design Guru" from years past, a perpetuated to this day by the follower-on Lemmings. Damn, I hope that didn't sound too harsh. Best Regards, Karl L. Baldwin Mountain Lodging http://www.mountain-lodging.com -------- new post - same topic -------- From: Tom Aman Subject: Resolution > The trend sure seems to be more and more > people these days are using a higher > resolution, with 45% using 1024 x 768 and a > low 7% using 800 x 600. These figures do > seem to vary depending what site one looks > at, although all seem to agree that 800 x > 600 has declined and continues to decline. - Robert Joy, LED 2683 You are making the mistake many have made in the past (and still make). You are equating screen resolution with browser window size, assuming that surfers all run their browsers full screen. Bear in mind that many of us do not. I seldom run my browser full screen because it makes text lines too long for comfortable reading and I find it very annoying when a site is designed to expect a wide screen (I hate those horizontal scroll bars). Also, screen size does not mean "available real estate". Personally, I have the Window's task bar at the bottom of my screen and often run with a second tool bar for some software I use a lot down running the left side of my screen. So with a resolution of 1024 x 768, I would probably have available display real estate of somthing like 995 x 740 (number are a guess). Also, some people like a task bar wider than the default to show more icons at one time so the 744 number would be more like 720. Basically, "optimal design parameters" are screen layouts that work at any reasonable size (even as small as 640 wide). It may take a bit more work to do this, but it will keep visitors much happier. Tom Aman (c) Copyright 1995-2008 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved. ----------------------------------------------------------------- "...an author is one who can judge his own stuff's worth, without pity, and destroy most of it." - Colette |




