Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2006 archives arrow LED Digest 2072: Principles of Posting, also Web Awards
LED Digest 2072: Principles of Posting, also Web Awards Print E-mail

==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
   Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
January 11, 2006                       Issue #2072
..............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Commercial CMS? ==--

                ~ David Jonah
"I am an enthusiastic advocate of HannonHill's
CMS product Cascade Server."

        --== Learning In This Enviroment ==--

                ~ Dirk Johnson
"You need to go through a distilling process."

                ~ Michael Linehan
"I'd like to ask that respect be a guiding
principle in posts..."

        --== Web Awards [was: The Good, Bad & Ugly] ==--

                ~ Bill Rice
"Many award programs in the advertising world
are no more than beauty contests..."

        --== Rectifying Alexa Listings ==--

                ~ Trudy Levy
"...it appears that it is Amazon that bought it out."

                ~ Michael Martinez
"Alexa's listings are fluff content..."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Voice Over IP Technology ==--
                ~ Viggie Bala

        --== Internet Radio --
                ~ Don Baker


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: David Jonah
Subject: CMS

> I would like to seek out other's experiences
> using commercial CMS products.
        - Laura C. Teeple

Regarding CMS. I am an enthusiastic advocate of HannonHill's CMS
product Cascade Server as I have used this with several clients to
render web sites with changing content as SEO compliant sites using
XML. The meta tag wizard and page construction when rendered make
this a reliable and reasonably priced commercial software that works
for us and our clients, time after time.

A client having used it on a publication site for a magazine based
web site, was able to create a fully functioning site in record time
and ease for a corporate site. They have a number of design
construction features that set them apart as a push CMS rather than
a dynamic pull page, which creates awkward URLS for SEO purposes.

They appear to have the SEO concepts figured out and their pricing
is one time based on a number of seats required for editing purposes
and you can edit as many web site urls as you can load your server
down with to service.

Very cool. www.hannonhill.com  Cascade Server - also see that Duke
University uses them for the same reasons you are looking for.

David Jonah, Wordsmith & Web

Jonah & Associates
Business Keywords & Profile Articles
http://www.localintheknow.com


------- new post - new topic --------

From: Dirk Johnson
Subject: Learning

> I am having a hard time learning in this environment.
> Too many ideas and opinions expressed here are
> leaving me feeling paralyzed. If we don't reach
> consensus, it's all babble...
        - Salem Kashou, LED 2070

Salem,

I can't resolve your frustration, but it is understandable. We are
all riding on the learning curve somewhere. Your place on the curve
is ahead of some and behind others.

The advice is all over the board, everyone's an expert out here. One
of the reasons for that is because what works for one site does not
work for another. Each business presents it's own unique profile, in
terms of how they market, how they distribute product, their
available capital, their established customer base, their goals,
etc. This will drive the choice of tools and tactics used on the
site. A blog may work great for one site and be a waste of time for
another. Same with email newsletters. Same with Pay Per Click ads.
On and on.

You need to go through a distilling process.  Read everything, and
consider it, compare it, and develop an approach that works for your
own circumstances. Watch what others in your industry do on their
sites (good and bad). Most of all, you need to look at it from a
return on investment perspective. And yet you also need creativity.
Lots of creativity, and willingness to experiment.

I think that the best advisors are the ones with their feet firmly
on the ground, with some real profit and loss experience under their
belt. Is a cool Flash movie going to work the best, or investing
that same money in a larger recipe base? I don't know the answer,
but I can guess, based on my own experience. Flash movies and other
whiz-bang has a place, but is it right for your site?

Salem, you have exposed a good topic here, and you seem to want some
input, so I'll go out on a limb, in an effort to advance the
discussion. Consider the rest of this post to be just public
brainstorming.

Looking at your site (http://www.kangaroobrands.com/), you are
trying many things, with your separate recipe site
(www.pocketdiet.com), coupons. All good.

Your least expensive method of reaching consumers is with your own
product packaging. Are you leveraging this to the maximum? That is,
creating pro-active promotions that drive product users to your
website, getting them to register, and then engaging them in a
positive way going forward? You have much of that infrastructure in
place already.

I would suspect that your number one goal is to have a consumer go
to the grocery store with Kangaroo pita bread already written on
their shopping list. Engagement of the consumer is the number one
way to get that done. A website provides tools to manage this, from
a data perspective. Then, to keep them interested, you have to
provide useful info.

Think of your own www.pocketdiet.com website in terms of the
consumer, not in terms of your own business. What does a consumer
want from Kangaroo? What works for them? People can see a genuine
effort to help, and they respond to it. Your product has great ease
of use for families on the go. Quick and easy and tasty recipes
would be high on the list, I think. Weight loss success stories may
also work.

Your product also relies upon other ingredients, and thus, other
food vendors. Cooperating with other vendors allows you to provide
more interesting co-promotions and more interesting material to your
customer base, in the form of easy recipes, etc. I realize that it
takes a lot of groundwork to accomplish this.

You also have church groups and other social organizations that need
to feed a lot of people quickly and easily. That's a different
aspect of engaging the consumer. Promotions and recipes can be built
around this, too.

Again, think from "outside looking in" (as opposed to "outside the
box"!) , as best you can, then develop tools that address the
consumer's needs and wants, in a genuine way.

Finally, how are you doing with search terms related to "pita". The
search volume numbers on www.wordtracker.com aren't huge, but they
are probably not that competitive, either. It's worth a look to see
if you can capture some of this highly-focused traffic.

Salem, just my two cents worth....Thanks for providing the diversion
from my day to day tasks...:)

Best regards,

Dirk Johnson, Partner - Operations

DomainDrivers LLC
www.domaindrivers.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Michael Linehan
Subject: Tone of posts

I had considered writing the following without naming names, but
decided against it. I want the person concerned to know what I
think. At the same time, this is just one small example of something
that irks me from time to time in how some people write to the list.
 It is, of course, not a big problem, but I wish it weren't there at
all.

Salem Kashou's post got two responses at the same time [issue 2071].
Both are making, essentially, very similar points.  But the tone is
TOTALLY different.

Beth Earle's post gives her contrary viewpoint in a thoroughly
positive and encouraging manner.

> Don't think of it as paralyzing ... think of it as freeing.
> You've got the skills and the intellect -- and the opportunity
> to select what should work best. It really is a pretty
> cool concept.

Sheryl Coppenger's post, on the other hand, is (in my opinion) rude.

> if a beginner can't get anything out of the discussion
> here maybe he should find a newbie forum someplace
> and come back when he's "grown up" a little more professionally.

"You've got the intellect" versus "newbie - come back when you've
grown up".

My presumption is that you didn't mean to be rude, Sheryl.  But this
is exactly the often-discussed danger of email. There's no voice
tone and body language to possible soften those words.

Yes, sometimes we might need to say something straightforward such
as "I think that's wrong" or "That is a myth".  But ANYTHING we want
to say can be phrased in a more or in a less respectful way.

I'd like to ask that respect be a guiding principle in posts, no
matter how strongly we may disagree with someone - that we write as
if it were a good friend standing in front of us --- or a 250lb
biker, if that image makes more impact :).

Michael Linehan, Marketing Alchemy
www.marketing-alchemy.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: William Rice
Subject: Web Awards [was: The Good, Bad, and Ugly...]

> It is a fact that award winning sites are not always
> the best designed sites for surfing purposes, so the
> questions here are: "In your view, is this award
> winning site well designed for the surfer and
> does it deserve the award?"
        - Tom Aman, LED 2071

As someone who is actively involved with the Web Marketing
Association's WebAward Competition, (www.webaward.org) I could not
agree more with this comment.  When it comes to "award winning
websites" it really depends on who's award was won.

In the early days of the Internet, website awards were a dime a
dozen. Remember when being a "Netscape cool site of the day" or "Top
5% of the Internet" was something to strive for - even if they never
told anyone what it took to win the recognition.

Many award program in the advertising world are no more than beauty
contests in which all that matters is big budget for a lot of Flash
animation and dynamic navigation menus.  An award program without
clearly communicated judging criteria, IMHO, belong right up there
with the "Bottom 95% of the Net" award.

I am glad to say that the Web Marketing Association has worked hard
to insure our judging criteria is more than simply a beauty contest.
To win a webaward you are judged on interactivity, ease of use, use
of technology, innovation, content and copy writing in addition to
design. With that said, a survey of last year's WebAward judges
found that lack of a credible design was the single most important
factor when scoring a site negatively.

Everyone likes to win awards and they can be a great boost for a
marketing effort. But it is important to know how an award was won
to determine its relative importance.

Bill Rice, President

Web Marketing Association
www.webmarketingassociation.org


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Trudy Levy
Subject: Alexa

> Anyone been able to rectify a wrong Alexa listing?
> ... I've emailed Alexa and the person that is listed
> as the "owner" who doesn't even have his site
> up last time I looked.
        - Dave Mead, LED 2071

1996-2004, Alexa Internet, Inc.
An Amazon.com Company

>From the Alexa site.  I thought it was Yahoo, but it appears that it
is Amazon that bought it out.  The former owner developer, Brewster
Kahle is involved with his site the Internet Archive.org and the
Open Content Aliiance.  He is a very cool dude, but no longer
manages Alexa.

Trudy Levy, Consultant

Digital Imaging Projects
http://www.dig-mar.com


------- new post - same topic --------

From: Michael Martinez
Subject: Alexa

If it really bothers you, submit your site for a crawl and wait a
few months.  The crawl will happen quickly.  The update will not.

Alexa's listings are fluff content and the only people who actually
look at them or care about them are Webmasters who mistakenly
believe that they are useful or relevant to search engine
optimization.

If you don't believe me, just look at your statistics and see how
many referrals you get from Alexa.com.  If you get as many as from
Google, Yahoo!, MSN, or Ask then go ahead and fret.  If you don't
get as many referrals from Alexa as from those services, then why
are you agonizing over nothing?

Michael Martinez
http://www.michael-martinez.com/


==== BILLBOARD ===================================

From: Viggie Bala
Subject: VoIP

> Vonage has been great. Mostly... But you can call
> and actually speak to a real person within seconds.
        - Steven Rothberg, LED 2070

> ... other services such as inter-office intercom
> may be the next coming thing if you can get it.
> It is not available everywhere. I have broadband
> service but it is not available where I live.
        - David Spahr, LED 2071

The inter-office intercom is a service that will be run by YOU.  All
you need is a PC Server and IP phones. Softphones (mostly free
downloads) will also do.

Eventhough it may not help home users much, there is an Open Source
project called Asterisk@Home (http://snipurl.com/lfx6) that
simplifies Asterisk installation with a single CD.  With this CD,
installing an Asterisk server is a breeze.  It does most (if not
all) of the installation tasks by itself. The ISO image can be
downloaded from the site and burn into a CD.

And regarding Vonage, you can subscribe through internet and use
their phone service from anywhere in the world.  Of course, in such
case, it is not convenient to do away with the analog phone.

The following location introduces the VoIP services in US with their
prices and features. http://www.jiwire.com/voip-guide-voip-plans.htm

Regards,

Viggie Bala
www.webvoize.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Donald Baker
Subject: Internet radio

Michael Martinez gave some podcasting links [issue 2071] in reply to
Jennifer Thomas' question about Internet radio. While that may
answer her question, it raises another in my mind.

What about someone wanting to become an online DJ, and legally
broadcast music over the Web? I think Live365 and some other Net
radio services will take care of tracking music plays and ensuring
the appropriate payments go to ASCAP, etc. I haven't checked into
this, though.

Has anyone had experience with this type of Net radio? Are there any
good options for someone who'd like to share their music passion
with Net listeners, yet not have to deal personally with the
residual payments? What about making some money from listeners'
buying MP3s or CDs via affiliate marketing, right off the Net-radio
station?

Don Baker
NSI Partners


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2006 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Use what talent you possess: the woods would be very silent
if no birds sang except those that sang best." - Henry Van Dyke