Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2006 archives arrow LED Digest 2123: The Comeback of Javascript
LED Digest 2123: The Comeback of Javascript Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
   Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
March 23, 2006                         Issue #2123
..............................................



            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW ======================

        --== The Javascript Comeback & AJAX ==--
                ~ Viggie Bala

        --== Real Estate Databases ==--
                ~ Paul Dobie


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Dealing with Blog Spam ==--
                ~ Linda Buquet
                ~ Dan Eskelson
                ~ Joseph Taylor
                ~ Dejan Bizinger

        --== To Bounce or Not To Bounce ==--
                ~ Kurt T. Francis
                ~ Jeré Matlock


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Have I Been Scammed? ==--
                ~ Donald Nelson
                ~ Alex Hughart

        --== Sites for Mobiles ==--
                ~ Tim Mullen


=========== NEW ==================================

From: Viggie Bala
Subject: Comeback of Javascript in AJAX

We recently had a long discussion on drop down menus.  JavaScript
for links & drop-down menus does not help SE indexing, and have a
negative image (particularly for SEO people).  Fear of stealth
attack also worked against javascript.  Javascript can be turned off
at the browsers and it is a big disadvantage if we rely on it for
site structure or activity.

But javascript had strong advantages.  Over the years, Javascript
entrenched itself as the default method for validating form
submissions, slide shows & image roll-over effects.  It is true that
Flash can do these things much better, but have it's own
disadvantages.

JavaScript plays pivotal roles in emerging technologies such as Web
2.0, Ajax, Ruby and Prototype, etc.  Of this AJAX seems to be
arrived already. Google uses it extensively for Gmail & Map.  The
speed and convenience of AJAXed sites are mind blowing.

The usability style promoted by AJAX seems to be the way to go.
Some features might not be apparent for a layperson.  We do remember
the old usability dictum: links must be blue & underlined etc., but
we have come a long way and the layperson is also catching up.

The current crop of mobile phones crammed so many menus & features
using the same no. of buttons as available 5 years ago.  And the
average non-technical layperson seems to catch up.

Fuelled by Gmail & Google Map, the instant response style of AJAX
may also catch up with general public quickly.  The trouble for web
developers is, while the technology is not new, making them work
together is not easy and needs experience.  Should we start to get
ready for this?

Would like to know fellow LEDers opinion on the usage of AJAX in
websites and it's disadvantages.

Viggie Bala


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Paul Dobie
Subject: Real Estate / Property Rental Listing Database

Wondering if anyone out there has any ideas about where I might find
a database suitable for Real Estate / Property Rental Listings.
Slick searchable databases displaying a product (with several other
thumbnail images) seem to be a dime a dozen everywhere but I cannot
locate an off the shelf product.

At this stage I don't have a budget from the client for it but I am
not looking for anything too sophisticated. And I figure if I can
show him a potential solution and give him a costing I might get a
budget. The sort of thing I am looking for similar to that used on
http://www.teneriffeforrent.com.au/rent.shtml

Any help appreciated. Thank you.

Best Regards

Paul Dobie
pdobie, accessjapan.com.au


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Linda Buquet
Subject: Blog spam

> Recently my client started using B2Evolution
> for her blog. She is spending about half an
> hour to 45 minutes every day deleting bogus
> comments / links...
        - Joanne Glasspoole, LED 2122

I was being interviewed for an article by the editor of Revenue
Magazine the other day.  They use B2 on their blog as well and she
said she she was spending HOURS some days deleting all the spam. So
your client is lucky!

B2 just happens to be a huge spam magnet and is incredibly short on
protection. Since I do lots of blogging, own a blog directory and
also have an RSS marketing forum I see it all the time.

I think B2 has a forum so you may check with some people over there,
but last I heard they had very weak spam protection if any. I use
WordPress on my blogs and one of the important reasons is the wide
variety of anti-spam and other plug-ins that are available.  My blog
is #1 in all the search engines, so it's highly visible. My
anti-spam programs catch everything except for a rare one that gets
through. Then the software warns me by email and asks me if I want
to delete it.

I would recommend your client start a new WordPress blog and let the
other one die.

Linda Buquet

Blogger and Affiliate Management Consultant
http://www.5staraffiliateprograms.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Dan Eskelson
Subject: Blog spam

Hi Joanne,

I had the same problem with B2Evo... daily removal of obnoxious
comments was necessary.

I finally changed to WordPress and my problem is solved. Spam
comments are caught by the Akismet module before they are posted. I
can look through them at my convenience to verify before I delete.

I was able to move all posts from B2Evo to WordPress.

Best regards,

Dan Eskelson

Clearwater Landscapes, Inc.
http://clearwaterlandscapes.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Joe Taylor
Subject: Blog spam

Hi Joanne,

We had the same problem and recently updated our blog software.  We
now use Movable Type version 3.2 which handles comment and trackback
spam, internally.  Meaning, spam never makes it to the blog itself
by setting up a "holding pen" for comments / trackbacks.  It sorts
most spam out automatically and you can "teach" it that certain
posts are spam.

Here is the link to our Water and Wastewater blog
http://www.waterandwastewater.com/blog/

It works really well and I am no longer tearing my hair out fixing
spam problems.  Also, it seems as though most spammers have stopped
trying to spam us because of the newer version of Movable Type.

I have no personal involvement with Movable Type or any other blog
software company, I am a LED long time subscriber and hate spam.

Very Truly Yours,

Joseph Taylor

Water and Wastewater.com
http://www.waterandwastewater.com/


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Dejan Bizinger
Subject: Blog Spam

I have been using for some time b2 Evolution. It is quite a nice
software, but now I'm using also open source NucleusCMS.

You should install a CAPTCHA modul for preventing comment  spam on
your blog. Here is a forum thread about that:

On b2 Evolution support forum go to Plugins & Hacks where you will
see a Fighting Spam thread.

Also here is another link for that:
http://snipurl.com/o0ed  [village-idiot.org]

Another solution for preventing comment spam is to require that a
visitor has to be log-in in order to post comments.

HTH,

Best regards,

Dejan Bizinger
http://www.bizinger.biz


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Kurt T. Francis
Subject: Bouncing

> We all get spammed, some worse than others. On
> a slow day I get 10,000, on a busy day, it hits almost
> 20,000... Should I start bouncing these e-mails...?
        - Scott Marino, LED 2121

Scott --

I'll say right off I'm very militant about this.  I run a one-horse
buggy, and when on my worst day I received over 6.400 spams in about
18 hours, I nearly had a heart attack.  It took me hours to get them
deleted, since I couldn't be *certain* every e-mail was spam --
about 30 weren't -- and I deeply resented being thrown behind in
other work.

IMHO, the spammers can watch... the... bouncing... bouncing...
bouncing ball.  Bounce away, with some sense of satisfaction.

A few years ago I kept getting maybe 30-40 identical e-mails per day
from the same spammer, obstensibly in New Zealand.  I finally
decided, "What to heck, I'll try writing back."

I did, in the form of a cease-and-desist e-mail.  I got a whiney
e-mail [much to my astonishment] in reply moaning, "I'm just an
honest guy trying to make a living!"

Intrigued that I had received a response, I wrote him back and
asked, basically, why he thought it appropriate to send a single
individual 30-40 copies of the same e-mail for months on end if he
were so honest.  I got the same sort of self-pitying reply.

So I wrote him a last time, with a complete, total, utter lie and
said I was working as an expert (ha ha) for a major firm seeking to
develop software that not only would bounce such e-mails to the
sorry senders but would turn the "Fry-alator" loose on their
machines, physically destroying their hard drives.

Lie it certainly was.  Equally certain is that I never heard from
him again -- no more spam, no more exchanges.

Oh, BTW, during our exchange, I continued to receive the Daily Dose
of Crap.

Kurt T. Francis, Web Master

Bangkok's Voice On The Web
http://bangkokatoz.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Jere Matlock
Subject: Bouncing vs. deleting spam

Do not bounce them.  That will put them in your outbound mail queue,
where they will sit while your server tries to deliver them many
times over the next five days.  It just adds to the problem; it will
slow your mail server down considerably.  The mail server will try
to send every message in the outgoing mail queue every time it sends
mail.  Most of the "from" addresses on these spam emails are bogus
anyway; they can't be "bounced" because the "sender" does not exist.
 You'll wind up getting more emails from the bounced messages,
saying, "No such email address on this server."

I host about 50 websites for my clients on a Unix (Linux, Apache,
mySQL, PHP, or "LAMP") server I lease.  When I was debugging some
slow mail deliveries, I was shocked to discover I had about 50,000
"bounced" emails sitting in my mail server's outgoing mail queue.
The server was trying to deliver each one every 10 minutes, and
chewing up a lot of processor time doing that.  It kept trying for 5
days.  That's my understanding of it, anyway, from reading up at
various forums -- I'm not trained as a Unix tech support person.

Instead of bouncing spam, you should set your mail server to have
such spam "fail".  That way the server won't try to return them back
to the sender, nor will it forward that mail to a "delete" box where
you then need to handle them again (delete them).  The spam just
dies right there.

One good program to use on a Unix server is "SpamAssassin", open
source software available here: http://spamassassin.apache.org/  It
uses Bayesian filters to assign "points" to an email and make a
determination based on how many points an email gets, whether or not
it is spam.  (10 points for using any variant of V-ia-G-ra, etc.)
You can tweak SpamAssassin settings and to require 20 or 50 points
before it labels something as spam, or you can be very aggressive
and tell SpamAssassin only 5 spam points and it's spam.  It then
modifies the headers of the email, marking it as spam, based on your
settings.  Then you can either send it all to a spam box
(recommended when you first set it up so you can check the box and
make sure valid emails aren't being marked as spam) or have it
"fail" such emails.  Then the spam just disappears and your server
doesn't waste any more effort trying to bounce it.

My spam problem pretty much disappeared after I set up SpamAssassin
to "fail" such spam.  (I have no affiliation with them -- just a
satisfied user.)

Best,

Jere Matlock
http://www.wordsinarow.com
Website Design & Marketing | SEO


==== BILLBOARD ===================================

From: Donald Nelson
Subject: Scam

Dear All,

Bev Hanna wrote (in LED 212) about how she was scammed. If she paid
by credit card then she should immediately start charge-back
proceedings. It sounds like she will have a good chance of
recovering the money.

Last year I took a chance at purchasing a bargain domain name for
$5.95 from a fly-by-night company and ended up being charged for
$600 with additional costs for "hosting" which I did not need and
did not order. I was not able to contact the offending company but
was able to recover the funds by starting a chargeback case against
the vendor.

It took a few months to process but it was worth it. Inquire with
your bank about how to go about it.

Sincerely,

Donald Nelson
www.a1-optimization.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Alex Hughart
Subject: Scam

> I went ahead and bought the mentoring package to the
> tune of $3,000.00, assuming that this was a legitimate
> upsell... Have I just done something remarkably stupid?
        - Bev Hanna, LED 2121

Bev,

I would like to take this opportunity to tell you - and for others
to see www.bevhanna.com - how beautiful your art is. I enjoyed
immensely going through the site - I can't decide whether I like
better visual art or little stories that accompany every picture. I
hope you make far, far more than those bastards took from you.

Regards,

Alex Hughart
www.bonsavon.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Tim Mullen
Subject: PDA / Cell Phone HTML

Hello LEDliens,

Cell phone pages are absolutely new to me for web designing.

Question One:  Where is a resource for just the basics?
Question Two:  Are there reliable PDA user / usage statistics?
Question Three: Can we brainstorm alternative design ideas?...

.. such as the feasibility of a CELLPHONE LINK or pda link on each
page of a website to simple low graphic, text pages that are
actually 'ole reliable' HTML pages... would such pages of 'repeat
information' cause any search engine problems.

Any other creative ideas are welcome.

Thanks LED for a very useful resourceful forum.

Tim Mullen

P.S. One friend's site I wish to experiment with is
http://displayhq.com


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

© Copyright 1995-2006 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

"We choose our joys and sorrows long before we experience them."
- Kahlil Gibran