Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2006 archives arrow LED Digest 2125: Verifying Site Traffic Claims
LED Digest 2125: Verifying Site Traffic Claims Print E-mail

==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
   Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
March 27, 2006                         Issue #2125
..............................................



            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


======= NEW ====================

        --== PPC and High Ranking Sites ==--

                ~ Alex Hughart
"I have a feeling that I'm competing with myself
and paying for it."

        --== Verifying Site Traffic Claims ==--

                ~ Carrie MacKenzie
"[Is it possible] to verify the figures when folks
offer great rates to advertise on their websites?"


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Javascript Comeback in AJAX ==--

                ~ Peter D'Aprix
"Too good to be true? Does anyone know about
this? Has anyone tried it? Is it a hoax?"

                ~ Viggie Bala
"Anybody replying or forwarding in Gmail will
find the striking difference."

        --== Dealing with Blog Spam ==--

                ~ James Miller
"I've never had spam on my blog..."

        --== To Bounce or Not To Bounce ==--

                ~ Rob Bishop
"Cloudmark is worth every penny."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Google Sued for Blacklisting ==--
                ~ Don Baker

        --== Reciprocal Linking ==--
                ~ Scott M. Stolz

        --== Sites for Mobiles ==--
                ~ Kerry Davis

        --== Have I Been Scammed? ==--
                ~ Michael Linehan


=========== NEW ==================================

From: Alex Hughart
Subject: High Ranking and PPC

Can anyone shed some light on how to deal with PPC once a high
ranking has been achieved?

Our high ranking search terms (top 5 on Google, MSN, Yahoo) are also
the ones that have the highest click-through and conversion rates in
PPC campaigns. I am reluctant to turn them off in PPC because a lot
of people don't even go pass top sponsored searches but, I have a
feeling that I'm competing with myself and paying for it.

We get about a third of our orders from PPC, a third from organic
search, forum posts and a third from repeat customers' bookmarks. I
know that every business is different but, I'm always amazed when I
hear of businesses relying solely on organic search and seemingly
making bank.

Note: my high converting search terms do much better than
competition's (at least that's what Google and Yahoo are telling me
in their reports). This and a relatively high percentage of repeat
customers (is it high? am I wrong?) leads me to believe that we are
a decently converting site.

What are your experiences?

Thanks to everybody in advance.

Alex Hughart
www.bonsavon.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Carrie MacKenzie
Subject: Verifying "Unique Visitor" Claims

Hi everyone...

I wanted to know if there was any way possible to verify the figures
when folks "offer" great rates to advertise on their websites,
because they get 6,000 visitors a day...

How does one sift through claims like that anyway? Sometimes the
websites look very professional... sometimes they look home made,
like mine.  I know you can't tell by the way they look, and was
wondering if there was any way.  Would Alexia provide that
information? (If I knew how to go get it.)

btw.. I was checking backlinks on google the other day after reading
in the LED on how to do it, and several showed up from LED
archives.. :)

Thanks for all the info you folks provide.. this is  a GREAT digest!

Carrie


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Peter D'Aprix
Subject: AJAX and ajaxWrite.com

> Would like to know fellow LEDers opinion on the
> usage of AJAX in websites and it's disadvantages.
        - Viggie Bala, LED 2123

Since I am not a technical person and not a programmer, this thread
does not mean a lot to me other than reminding me that the sink
needs some attention. However, I received an email yesterday from a
friend sending me a link to a new outfit with a similar name
www.ajaxWrite.com . Apparently they use AJAX technology to deliver
the software.

It was a link to a newsletter called "MIchael's Minute" by one
Michael Robertson http://www.michaelrobertson.com which started:

-------------------
"What if there was alternative for Microsoft Word that would install
and open in 6 seconds, read and write Microsoft Word .doc files and
run on Macintosh, Microsoft Windows or Linux computers? And oh yeah,
it was free so consumers didn't have to pay $499 for Microsoft
Office. I'm excited to announce that day is here."
-------------------

Too good to be true? Does anyone know about this? Has anyone tried
it? Is it a hoax?

You need FireFox to use it.

Peter D'Aprix - Visual Communications
http://peterdaprix.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Viggie Bala
Subject: Javascript AJAX

> I am a technical non-layperson and I often encounter sites
> where navigation is non-apparent and/or difficult to figure out.
        - Tom Aman, LED 2123

I've also fumbled in a few sites to find the navigation.  It is the
way they designed the site (trying to be different & ending up with
mouth in place of eyes etc.), but the same technology can be used in
a subtle manner.

Google's Gmail is one example.  It doesn't show off latest
technology, navigation is predictable and anyone can use it in the
normal way.  But some of the screens appears instantly.  Anybody
replying or forwarding in Gmail will find the striking difference.

Regarding mobile phones, I agree with Tom that I don't need more
features.  I have to constantly guard my phone from my 9-year old
kid, else he will go on play games & drain the battery. Luckily my
plan doesn't allow WAP connection, else he will play with his
friends thru phone.  Honestly, I still don't know how to connect to
WAP from a mobile, but he does and played an online game once with
another kid across the table using a guest's phone. It can be put
this way, the usage of features are inversely proportional to the
age of user. :)

The point about latest phones were, even though there are more
features, it can be used in the same style as old phones.  Just
punch the no's - click 'call' and it will still work.  We need to
learn sequential button operations only if we want to use more
feature.

We can add features the same way in websites.

Regards,

Viggie Bala

Helping Websites to Work
http://www.viggie.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: James Miller
Subject: Blog spam

> Recently my client started using B2Evolution
> for her blog. She is spending about half an
> hour to 45 minutes every day deleting bogus
> comments / links...
        - Joanne Glasspoole, LED 2122

I've never had spam on my blog.  Perhaps no-one reads it, but it's
more likely because I don't allow comments.  When someone want to
make a comment, they just e-mail me.  That method may not be
acceptable to your client.

One solution that I can think of is to put the blog on your own web
site.  I do that and it's easy with Blogger. I could then write a
program to delete the comments from the idiots and then blacklist
them.  It's just a question of knowing the format and working out a
simple strategy.

If anybody is in the least bit interested, then my blog is at :-
http://www.jamesmiller.com/weblog/blogger.html

James Miller

Daisy Analysis
www.daisy.co.uk


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Rob Bishop
Subject: Bouncing

> ... I'm happily using Cloudmark, which connects users
> with its worldwide community to flag all incoming spam.
        - Don Baker, LED 2124

Don mentioned Cloudmark. I would highly recommend it! I only run
about 10 staff computers, so server enterprise solutions are out of
our budget. Cloudmark is worth every penny. I used it myself for a
couple of years and then insist it is on every staff members
computer now.

Like Don said, it is very reliable and works great. You feel a sense
of power ( small sense, but that still counts ) since you are making
a difference when you click that "Block" button. You may still see a
few of the same spam for a day or two, but as the community 'votes'
on what is spam and what is not, these will quickly disappear. I
personally found no false positives, so now each computer puts the
spam straight to the delete folder. I haven't sifted through for
possible errors in years, and have not had one client say "Did you
get my email ?" When I had not...

I should have thought of setting up an affiliate link like Don.  :)

Bear Hugs

Rob Bishop

Binkley Custom Products
www.customplushtoys.com


==== BILLBOARD ===================================

From: Donald Baker
Subject: Google sued for blacklisting site

This should be interesting!
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/03/17/D8GDKG900.html

--------------------
"Google Inc.'s mysterious methods for ranking Web sites came under
attack Friday in a lawsuit accusing the online search engine leader
of ruining scores of Internet businesses that have been wrongfully
banished from its index.

"The civil complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose by
KinderStart.com, seeks to be certified as a class action
representing the owners of all Web sites blacklisted by Google's
Internet-leading search engine since January 2001.

"KinderStart alleges Google has engaged in anticompetitive behavior
and misled the public by positioning its search engine as an
objective source for finding Internet content. The suit seeks
unspecified financial damages and a court order that would require
Google to change its ways."
--------------------

More good detail in the news report.

Don Baker
NSI Partners


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Scott M Stolz
Subject: Reciprocal Linking

> Our "Web Guru" at work will always tell our sales guys and clients
> that the "secret to getting a good rank in the search engines is a
> good link campaign and you have to get more inbound links than
> your competition's website."
        - Tony Gschwend, LED 2116

Here's the thing with incoming links.  It highly depends on the
quality of the links.  One link from DMOZ or the New York Times is
worth hundreds, if not thousands, of links from other sources.  Of
course, notice that it isn't easy to get your link on either of
those websites.  Why?  Quality Control.  They only link to quality
websites. Which is why search engines respect them so much.

Also, I have noticed that it tends to take months for incoming links
to have any effect.  It also can takes months for new pages to get
listed, although usually it takes a few weeks.  So if you assumed
that the links had no effect after waiting only a month or so, you
haven't given enough time for them to have an effect yet.

Incoming links do help, but are not vital to search engine ranking.
Quality content is.  And if you get important websites to link to
you, that DOES help... a lot.  But again, they only link to quality
websites.

Scott M. Stolz
http://www.caribbeanchoice.com/


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Kerry Davis
Subject: Mobiles

You can find several HTML books that have sections on mobile HTML
programming.  I've got one by Elizabeth Castro called "HTML for the
World Wide Web," 5th edition.  It has a decent chapter on the basics
of programming for mobile devices.

Thank you,

Kerry Davis

Processing & Printing Manager
www.olydata.net


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Michael Linehan
Subject: Scam

> ... I decided to go ahead and work with the
> program I'd signed for. Given that I'm not well-versed
> in e-commerce, even if I get only basic training
> I'll be further ahead than before...
        - Bev Hanna, LED 2124

Bev, I sincerely think you can get much better training for free.
There's a lot of good information around.  Accounts I have read
would seem to indicate they have nothing of value to offer you.

> ... and if they do live up to their claims
> I should easily be able to make back
> what I paid out within the first year.

Nothing I read in researching them indicates that there is any chance
at all of making that money back.

> ... I will get what I can from the information provided
> and, when the time is right, make better-informed
> decisions. Once burned, twice shy, right?

You have much more to lose than mere money.  From what people have
reported (see references I sent before and many more similar), there
is a considerable danger of losing a huge amount of time and your
emotional well-being.

You have been scammed.  I think engaging further with the scammers
would be unwise in the extreme.

Michael Linehan
www.marketing-alchemy.com


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

© Copyright 1995-2006 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

"Golf is my profession. Golf is not my life." - Tiger Woods