| LED Digest 2169: Eudora & HTML |
|
|
|
==================================================
The LED Digest
Moderated Discussion List
"Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"
Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom
pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains
==================================================
List Moderator: Published by:
Adam Audette LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
May 26, 2006 Issue no. 2169
..............................................
.....IN THIS DIGEST.....
==== CONTINUING =================
--== Postcard Marketing ==--
~ James Miller
"I find cartoons are pretty good..."
~ Ian Smith
"...simple white postcards with limited text
and a color logo..."
--== Email Cloaking ==--
~ Claudiu Spulber
"There was a good 'spam the spammer'
initiative from Blue Security..."
~ Jim King
"An image is problematic because it requires
the user to type the address..."
~ Steven Birk
"...that got me thinking about the WayBack
Machine..."
==== BILLBOARD ===================
--== Eudora & HTML ==--
~ Steve Warriner
~ Martha Retallick
======== CONTINUING ===============================From: James Miller Subject: Postcards > What sort of postcard campaigns have gotten your > attention? What's worked in your own campaigns? - Beth Earle, LED 2168 There is a compromise here. I use postcards a lot and always recommend them to my clients. Look at www.kenpyne.com for one of the cartoonists I use. I find cartoons are pretty good as these don't tend to go in the bin, but if they are funny they get pinned to the notice board. But then good colour pictures are also a good idea. The compromise is that I would not go for anything too expensive, as the more you spend on the card, the less you'll get for the money. I would also design the card, so that you can use it to send personal messages, or write things down for clients. It is so much nicer to receive a nice hand written card with your passwords, than an e-mail, that gets lost when the machine crashes. But always leave white space on the back, so you can write something! I've made some and filled them with marketing bumpf and lived to regret them. Hope all this helps. James Miller Daisy Analysis www.daisy.co.uk -------- new post - same topic --------- From: Ian Smith Subject: Postcards Beth, I think, for my part, the simple white postcards with limited text and a color logo have done the most to get my attention. Google's mailing follows this pattern. The glossy colored ones tend to blend in, but if you put your logo in the center with brief text below it may have a better chance of being read. You could even tie it in with a case study. "XYZ Company went from $500 in sales a day to $2000 in sales a day. See how we helped them do it using Search Engine Optimization by visiting abc.com/casestudy/" Postcards often have too much information whereas you are really just trying to get them to your website and get them thinking about the value that your services provide. But if you can make a small impression they'll hopefully remember you when they start looking for the type of services you provide. My two cents... Ian Smith http://dottactics.blogspot.com -------- new post - new topic --------- From: Claudiu Spulber Subject: Email cloaking I think it's very hard to protect your email address from being gathered. Maybe if you place it as an image it would work, but this way people that want to contact you will have to type it in. Beside the programs that gather emails, there are also programs that generate them using common words. For instance you'll get spam emails to info@, support@, sales@.. addresses even if you'll never post them somewhere. There was a good "spam the spammer" initiative from Blue Security (bluesecurity.com) but they recently had to stop because they were taking ISPs down. Basically it was a big opt-out list that spammers would consult before sending emails, so that no one from that list would receive unwanted emails. Regards, Claudiu Spulber http://www.backup4all.com http://www.novapdf.com -------- new post - same topic --------- From: Jim King Subject: Email cloaking > Anyone have the technical knowledge to KNOW > for sure whether encoding no longer works? - Michael Linehan, LED 2167 I've used Unicode cloaking for several years with good results. The browser automatically decodes it, so the web surfer can't tell the difference. Spammers could easily decode it, but apparently it's too much trouble, especially when there are so many easy victims out there who leave their e-mail addresses unprotected. An image is problematic because it requires the user to type the address, a barrier to at least some users...too much trouble, too easy to typo. Go to http://www.codefoot.com/software/ecloaker for a Windows or online Unicode e-mail generator. Jim King http://www.borderline-productions.com -------- new post - same topic --------- From: Steve Birk Subject: Email cloaking In LED 2168, Will Bontrager made the comment about those who publish their email addresses on web sites, "Now is the time to remove it, before it gets on spammers' lists". Great advice... but that got me thinking about the WayBack Machine at http://web.archive.org Can a spam harvesting spider find the pages that are included in the WayBack Machine archives? If the answer is yes, then that would mean a harvester could still be picking up email addresses with the old mailto: link in the source code of a page, even though you may have changed it to a cloaking JS or even eliminated it on your current page(s). I did try this on a few sites of those who recently have stated they currently cloak their email addresses or use contact forms and sure enough, I was able to find in the archived pages the old mailto: link with an email address clearly in the source code for the taking. Just wondering if the archived pages can be found by a spam harvesting spider? As people get wiser and start thinking about protecting their email addresses better by using some of the methods described here in the LED, I would hate to think that there are still old mailto: type links with your exposed email address out on the Internet forever. Regards, Steven Birk http://medcenternews.com/emergency ==== BILLBOARD =================================== From: Steve Warriner Subject: Eudora and HTML > I'm just wondering if...there is a way to > make HTML actually work in Eudora. - Tom Anson, LED 2168 I have used Eudora (sponsored version) for 2 or 3 years, but just recently tried sending HTML. Pasting the code into the message, or attaching an entire HTML document resulted in viewable source code with the rendered document (as viewed in a browser) showing at the bottom of the email. I just tried this, sent to myself: Message > Send File which opens the attach dialogue; then I attached the HTML document. This gave the best results that I have seen and is supported by the information here: http://eudora.com/techsupport/kb/2726hq.html Getting to that page I ran across this statement "Outgoing HTML is not one of Eudora's strengths..." on the Eudora discussion board. IMHO the ability for the recipient to view HTML is going to be determined by their email client settings. My settings in Eudora are to use Microsoft's settings for viewing mail, and to put text attachments in the body of the message. This also means the emails returned because of viewing problems may not appear the same to me as to the recipient. It parallels the Web Standards for site design problem of trying to design for all possible browsers and their possible settings. I have an HTML newsletter that includes a link to the online version for email clients that do not work. Another solution might be to include a feedback link to improve all recipient's ability to read the HTML, yet it could get to be impossible to come up with one solution for a large number of recipients, if they take the time to respond. I am unaware (or ignorant) of an email standards compliance attempt. Steve Warriner -------- new post - same topic --------- From: Martha Retallick Subject: Sending HTML e-mail out of Eudora In a recent LED post, Tom Anson described his efforts to send HTML e-mail via the Eudora software. To make a long story short, those efforts weren't very successful. I, too, have had such difficulties with Eudora. The solution? Take Eudora out of the equation. When I send HTML e-mail to the people on my mailing lists, I use a third-party that offers a web-based system. Two of my favorites are: 1. Databack Systems - www.databack.com 2. Campaign Monitor - www.campaignmonitor.com However, and yes, there always is a "however" when you're talking about HTML e-mail, even the use of third-party, web-based systems won't prevent your message from turning to hash in some e-mail software programs. Face it, some of them just don't like HTML e-mail. Best solution I've found to this problem is to offer a link to a website offering the same message that you're trying to send via e-mail. Martha Retallick Western Sky Communications Web/Graphic Design & Consulting http://www.WesternSkyCommunications.com
-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains
© Copyright 1995-2006 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"There are a thousand thoughts lying within a man that he does not
know till he takes up a pen to write." - William Makepeace Thackeray |




