Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2006 archives arrow LED Digest 2211: Improving Rankings
LED Digest 2211: Improving Rankings Print E-mail
8 posts on 6 topics, including Improving Rankings, MySpace for
Marketing, Reciprocal Linking, Fixed vs Fluid Sites, and more...

==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
   Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
.............................................
July 26, 2006                       Issue no. 2211
.............................................



            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW =====================

        --== Suggestions on Improving Rankings ==--

                ~ Lilian Phuong Dang
"Please give me some suggestions as how
to improve for ranking purposes."


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== MySpace for Marketing ==--

                ~ Ivan Jimenez
"I definitely want to see more about this topic..."

                ~ Kathryn Martyn
"If you happen to sell ring tones, MySpace
is your gold mine."

        --== Reciprocal Linking ==--

                ~ Eric Ward
"Anchor Text doesn't matter as much as you
think and will matter even less in the future."

                ~ Dirk Johnson
"...cooperation and networking is what distinguishes
a site in the eyes of a niche community."

        --== Fixed Width vs Fluid Web Sites ==--

                ~ Valerie Beeby
"...how many site visitors simply accept their
browser's default page size as given...?"


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Smart Framing ==--
                ~ Michael Martinez

        --== 000domains.com - Anyone There? ==--
                ~ Lew Vividere


========== NEW ===================================

From: Lilian Phuong Dang
Subject: Need suggestions for improving ranking

Hi,

Please visit my website at http://www.maternityactivewear.com and
kindly give me some suggestions as how to improve for ranking
purposes.

I also need SEO service, can anyone suggest a company that you have
dealt with before that provides excellent service at a good price.

All your feedback is appreciated.

Lilian Phuong Dang


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Ivan Jimenez
Subject: MySpace

> Anybody else marketing via MySpace? I'd
> be interested in hearing your experiences.
        - Moderator Comment

I've been using MySpace to promote some clients with some sucess but
to be fair, I haven't dedicated any real time other than putting up
a generic profile. With a well thought out plan (for us little guys
/ gals) or a dedicated MySpace task force (for the Fortune set),
MySpace could be a valuable branding tool.

> ... it's not clear just how well the MySpace recruiting
> is going for the Marines... just 430 people have contacted
> a recruiter through the site in 5 months, with just 170
> of them considered prospective recruits.
        - from a quoted article, LED 2210

I'll admit, the numbers for the Marines certainly are not remarkable
but it seems they weren't looking for a direct marketing solution
but rather a branding solution and with 12,000 friends and thousands
more seeing the ads and being enticed to purchase video games that
promote the military, I'd say the campaign is a success.

I definitely want to see more about this topic as it is something
I've been thinking of recommending for a client (he promotes big
brands using customized cars and motorcycles).

Ivan Jimenez
ij, smarterclicks.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Kathryn Martyn
Subject: MySpace

Saturday I saw a nice looking young man selling his rap CDs at the
Vancouver Washington's weekend Farmer's Market,
http://www.vancouverfarmersmarket.com/  If you live in the Vancouver
Washington / Portland Oregon area come visit. He told me it was,
"clean, no bad language," to which I replied, "Uh, oh. My son might
not like it!"

He also mentioned you could find him on MySpace. I gave the CDs to
my son and asked him to listen and tell me whether he liked it. He
and his friends all chimed, "Does he have MySpace?" So if you cater
to the younger crowd, I'd create a page and start putting it out
there. If you happen to sell ring tones, MySpace is your gold mine.

Kathryn Martyn Smith, M.NLP

Ending Emotional Eating, One Bite at a Time
http://www.onemorebite-weightloss.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Eric Ward
Subject: Linking

From 13 years worth of link building for clients huge and tiny, (pre
Google and Pagerank), I can share a few thoughts.

Chasing Pagerank is a dead end strategy for long term success.
Whether for your own site or in the links you seek at other sites.
I have never once let Pagerank influence my link building tactics.

Reciprocal links are not bad, but people do use them badly. If you
are doing so for the sake of search rank, dumb.  For content quality
and relevance to your readers? Smart.

Link request letters work if you use them correctly.  Want to see a
golden oldie? I wrote this six years ago.

What Your Link Request Should Contain and Why
http://www.clickz.com/experts/archives/linking/build_links/article.php/831971

Anchor Text doesn't matter as much as you think and will matter even
less in the future.

Lastly, if you were told that all current links to your site will
become useless for search rank, and you had to start getting new
links all over again, what types of sites would you go after and
why?  Each site needs its own set of links, different from any other
site.  Your willingness to go find the "Perfect Storm" of links for
your content (rather than short cuts) will determine your success.

Eric Ward

Holistic Link Development & Content Publicity
http://www.ericward.com


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Dirk Johnson
Subject: Linking

Thanks to David Spahr for feedback [issue 2210]. I would like to
make some clarifications and additional points, to refine the
discussion.

The link management tool that I referenced, LinksManager.com, does
not provide their clients with an email address extraction spider,
by policy. They also have other anti-spam policies in place, to
prevent abusers from using their tool. Unfortunately, some of the
other link management tools make it easy to send spam, and they have
no control over how their tool is used.

Nevertheless, much like other aspects of life, it is the end user,
not the tool, that is at fault for the abuse, and plenty of link
spammers do not use commercial link management tools. Spam is
independent of the tool.

I would make the suggestion that everyone who publishes a link
directory that makes an offer to reciprocate provide a submission
form as the means to accept their link submissions, and never
publish an email address for the purposes of reciprocal link
requests. Even a simple "mailto:" form can cut down significantly on
non-relevant, junk link submissions.

I do need to note, for clarity, that while a basic mailto: form
removes the email address from the visible page and directs people
to use the form, it still exposes the email address to code spiders.
A discussion about how to hide email addresses from all manner of
web spiders has been held here in LED in the past, and it may be
worth a review. It's beyond the scope of this post. If junk email
(of any kind) is a problem, I'd advise sites to protect themselves
from email address spiders.

[see the thread entitled, "Does Email Cloaking Work?" which began in
issue 2167; discussions continue through issue 2175. here's a link
to a category listing of the relevant issues:
http://www.led-digest.com/content/category/5/28/55/20/40/  -ed.]

Also, David, you exercise strict editorial control over your link
directory, and you state your linking policy publicly. That's the
way it should be. Respectable sites that comply with it are not
heard from in the first place, or if you ask them to stop
submitting, they do. According to my records here, we've had your
sites listed as "do not submit" since May of 2004, when you refined
your linking policy and asked us to stop submitting, and we did.
We're not perfect, but we try hard to comply, as do other sites that
pursue this work properly. Unfortunately, it is the spammers that
are most visible and non-compliant, but they are also the least
successful, since respectable sites ignore them.

In spite of the spammers, you imply that your link directory has
played a part in your overall marketing and branding effort, over a
ten year period. You reciprocate when it is appropriate for both
parties, but you do not require reciprocation. If so, then your
experience is similar to that of many other niche sites that have
been around for a long time.

It's an example of how this works as a branding function. By
providing a robust resource directory in your niche, you add
significantly to the attractiveness of your site. A good directory
is good content. Combining it with more traditional content, as you
have done, creates a "hub".

Hubs are powerful, and very hard to compete with, especially for
sites that do not provide the resource link directory or do not make
an offer to reciprocate. Uncooperative sites have a much harder time
establishing their network presence and link popularity, for obvious
reasons. They try to be islands unto themselves, and expect other
sites to link to them, but will not link back, even when it would be
appropriate. Great traditional content is all well and good, but
combining it with cooperation and networking is what distinguishes a
site in the eyes of a niche community.

Once again, it comes down to real people making real decisions that
have a real effect. Cooperation generates goodwill within a
community, and David's sites readily testify to that. A site that
does not take his cooperative approach toward relevant linking would
have a very hard time competing with his established positions.
Writing content, and even promoting it aggressively via press
release, article submission and other "one-way" link methods, would
never match it.

Spammers are out there, in reciprocal linking, as well as within
many other aspects of the World Wide Web. There are ways to minimize
it, but allowing their actions to determine policy can be very
shortsighted. Successful site owners look beyond the spammers.

Best regards,

Dirk Johnson, Partner - Operations

DomainDrivers LLC
www.domaindrivers.com
www.linkstrategy.com


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Valerie Beeby
Subject: Fixed width

Hello All

I'm heavily on the side of fluid layouts, but I've been wondering
whether Tom, Dick and old Aunt Harriet even know they can resize
their browser windows. (In most cases anyway.) Personally I play
almost every website I visit like a concertina, expanding and
contracting a fluid page until it's just as I like it. Usually with
the main text about the width of a newspaper column for easy reading.

Marvellous. But I wonder how many site visitors simply accept their
browser's default page size as given, not realising they can alter
it?

Valerie Beeby

Making images small - smaller - smallest
http://www.purple-owl.com/art-photoshop-gifs.html


==== BILLBOARD ===================================

From: Michael Martinez
Subject: Smart framing

> Isn't there still an issue with spiders seeing
> the content in a frame? I have avoided frames
> for the same reason I have been avoiding flash.
        - Lew Vividere, LED 2210

Spiders don't have any trouble with standard frames. They don't
appear to follow iFrame tags.

However, Google's new Accessible search does not appear to be
frame-friendly. http://labs.google.com/accessible/

Michael Martinez

"Cuando Maria canta, canta para mi"
http://www.michael-martinez.com/
http://michael-martinez.blogspot.com/


-------- new post - new topic ---------

From: Lew Vividere
Subject: 000domains

Seems pretty expensive for domain names...  I get my domains through
my hosting company:

linkuphosting.com

The domain names are under $10 and free with a $50/annual hosting
plan.

Yahoo has had new (not transfer) domain names for $2.99.  I have had
several issues with Yahoo and wouldn't buy a domain from them for
$.01 but I thought I would mention it for those who aren't as
anti-Yahoo as I am.

Lew Vividere


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

© Copyright 1995-2006 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"The whole world steps aside for the woman who knows
where she is going." - Anon.