================================================== The LED Digest Moderated Discussion List "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"
pair Networks: The LED's Web Host Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains
================================================== List Moderator: Published by: Adam Audette LED Digest adam,led-digest.com http://www.led-digest.com ................................................. January 12, 2003 Issue #1726 .................................................
.....IN THIS DIGEST.....
====== NEW ======================
<Moderator Comment> ~ Back in Action
--== Banner Exchanges in 2004 ==--
~ Michael Colucci "Are banner exchanges still popular?"
==== CONTINUING =================
--== Where to Focus? ==--
~ John Taylor "...place your focus on making *long term* improvements..."
--== Affiliate Ad Blocking Software ==--
~ Ben Cunningham "Have fun shopping in the largest store of empty aisles on the planet!"
--== Affiliate Programs [was Ad Blockers] ==--
~ David Yancey "Make sure that the affiliate and merchant sites are 'co-targeted'.
--== Shopping Carts ==--
~ Rebecca Neilson "Some shopping carts...can be directly linked to your inventory program."
==== BILLBOARD ===================
--== Commercial Sites, Non-commercial Sites, and Search ==-- ~ Lanell Grant
======= NEW =====================================
<Moderator Comment>
Our server issues are behind us now, so please go back to the regular posting address:
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
Time to get back to work!
- Adam
------------------------
From: Michael Colucci Subject: Banner Exchange
Are banner exchanges still popular? If so, can anyone recommend a good banner exchange to join?
Michael Colucci
===== CONTINUING =================================
From: John Taylor Subject: Capital focus
> If you suddenly had the infusion of significant capital > into your on-line business... where would you focus? - Tom Anson, LED 1725
Tom,
When you find yourself in a cash rich situation, it can feel like you are a kid in a candy store and you may be tempted to buy all sorts of goodies!
My best advice would be to review all your options very carefully but place your focus on making *long term* improvements to your sales and marketing processes:
1. Activities that will generate *profitable* traffic
2. Activities that will enhance your search engine ranking
3. Activities that will improve your web site sales conversion rate.
Don't invest in large scale advertising and promotional activities until you have undertaken some small yet valid tests to ensure that such advertising will provide you with a return on your investment.
Building the link popularity of your web site will result in long term results.
Even a small increase in the conversion rate of your web site will make a big difference to your bottom line with the same level of visitors that you are enjoying right now. In fact there is no point in paying for more traffic until you have tested and tweaked your web site to improve your sales conversion rate.
Good luck
Take care
John Taylor www.test-and-track.com
------- new post - new topic -------
From: Ben Cunningham Subject: Ad blockers
> Do viewers have the right to install software that > defaces their view of your site and removes your > revenue generation mechanisms? - Marty Milette, LED 1722
I run many web sites that are all supported by affiliate ads that are now trying to be blocked. Do I believe ad-blockers are legal? Probably.
So, if these ad-blockers succeed and block all ads (which is pretty much impossible and I am already setting up a way around Norton's ad blocking), do I believe someone would pay something to visit my sites? Probably not.
Do I keep paying time and money for hosting and web development? Nope and neither does any other content site that isn't established and large enough to charge a subscription fee.
So, by succeeding in using ad-blockers, you have succeeded in limiting the web to a lot of retail sites and a small number of content sites (which can now charge more since there are less competing content sites).
Congratulations, you no longer have to pay for an ad-blocker (just everything on the web)!
Also, the Norton ad-blocker blocks links that contain qksrv.net because CJ affiliate links contain that domain name. So, what if they try to block ads from all the retail sites that have affiliate programs? Are they going to try to block any link that contains amazon.com, so when you go to amazon.com it is just a blank page?
Have fun shopping in the largest store of empty aisles on the planet!
Ben Cunningham http://www.affiliatemoneymakers.com
------- new post - related topic -------
From: David Yancey Subject: Effective Affiliate Partnerships [was: Ad blockers]
In LED #1724, Mark Whitman has much to say about outbound affiliate links. We are about to launch the affiliate programs for our new vivante.com paid search site, so I was struck especially by his remark -
> ... It makes no sense to give users lots of reasons > to leave your site by means of affiliate links in hopes > of a relatively meager affiliate commission.
On the surface, this harsh judgement seems to run counter to the most common aim of affiliate programs, which is to allow those sites which can aggregate visitors to monetize them through (the chance of) earning affiliate commissions on exit. Indeed, a very large number of sites exist solely to capture traffic, then re-route it to any one of dozens of affiliates.
How *dare* Mark say that this "proven" online concept "makes no sense"? If the better-quality, content-rich sites took his advice, I would be left only with crappy, misleadingly promoted affiliate farm sites as possible partners. Not good for a search site that is determined to be the top-quality finding tool for the savvy, educated, busy, affluent consumer.
So what Mark says would be really outrageous -- if he were not 100% correct!
In designing our program, we consulted with some of the most experienced brains in affiliate sales networking, and concluded that
1. If an affiliate program is not good over the long term for both the originating as well as the merchant site, the so-called partnership will quickly become a one-way street. The clear answer? Lifetime commissions.
What it means for us is that we have to design a revenue model that can pay out significant rewards for affiliates over time as well as on the front-end of the sale - but which will not then price our services out of the market.
Tough assignment! But it is simply the only solid way to ensure happy and motivated affiliates as we build the business.
2. If the merchant site is truly targeted, as vivante.com is, then it makes no sense to simply sign up thousands of un-screened affiliates who may or may not generate quality traffic. The obvious conclusion? We have to run our own program, and carefully add serious-minded affiliates, one by one.
It makes no sense to make this effort for a "partner" who may not generate quality visitors in significant numbers, so it means we have to be prepared to work with our affiliate partners over a long period of time we have to invest in the affiliate relationship over the full life cycle of our business, not just on the front-end.
3. If the target audience of the affiliate site comprises mostly people who are very unlikely to "convert" once they arrive at the merchant's doorway, the affiliate has very little realistic chance to earn *any* commission, much less a lifetime payout for his aggregation effort. The obvious lesson? Make sure that the affiliate and merchant sites are "co-targeted".
What this means to us is that since we are after a predominantly 25-plus audience, with special emphasis on female users and seniors, we won't be seeking affiliation with sites aimed at, for example, teens, students, and other general audience surfers.
4. If - as Mark Whitman suggests - the merchant has no interest in generating "back traffic" to the originating affiliate, then it is true to say that the affiliate is merely serving as a doorway to the merchant, soon (probably) to be forgotten by the visitor. The reasonable response?
The merchant needs to do more than simply credit the affiliate in some tracking program; he needs to design his relationship with the visitor so that the visitor is encouraged to *return to the affiliate site when his "business" is done.* Whew! That is a tall order. But that is exactly what our program will be doing.
Thanks, Mark, for raising doubts about the conventional, take-it-for-granted relationship between affiliate sites and merchants.
And thanks, too, for your insightful suggestions on using content newsletters to drive affiliate sales - that is another idea we have incorporated in our program.
David Yancey http://www.vivante.com
------- new post - new topic -------
From: Rebecca Neilson Subject: Shopping carts
> I am looking for a shopping cart that will allow me > control the number of items sold, without any oversell. - Julian de Burgh, LED 1722
Some shopping carts like MIva Merchant can be directly linked to your inventory program. You just have to update your site to show quantity available and when that is gone you can direct your shopping cart to say out of stock or backorder with estimated time before delivery can be made.
Rebecca Neilson www.hansons.net
==== BILLBOARD ====================================
From: Lanell Grant Subject: Commercial, Non-commercial, and Search
Hi LEDers,
I simply could not let Michael Martinez latest post go by unchallenged.
> The on-line business community has been self-deceiving > for at least as many years as I have been practicing search > engine optimization.
> The number 1 reason for why people surf the Web > is to find entertainment. The second most popular > reason is to socialize. - Michael Martinez, LED 1712
This commentary is a bit of a mish mash of half truths that misses the point. It may be that the number 1 and 2 reasons for surfing are as stated. What does that have to do with results when searching "car radiators"? Are you suggesting dancing radiators to entertain? How about a site of teen age girls that have a chat line for radiators? Hey, hey, hey.. let's get social here...
The truth is that many key phrases should and do return those horrible "commercial" results. That is what the searcher wants.. like it or not.
> In fact, people DO want to see lists of links - but only lists of > links that they feel have been "vetted" by a third party...
I don't know what Internet Michael is using but I assert that the average "linking" site is anything but altruistic. They are serious commercial ventures for the most part. They exist as an SEO byproduct or as location that sells advertising one way or the other. There is nothing qualitative about who is found there, it's just money.
Further, our surfer likely can not differentiate "vetted" sites from others. I'm not sure I can.
In general owners / sponsors are carefully hidden. I can take Michael to several that are disgraceful, outright fraud.. claiming independence but for sale to anyone.
> The vast majority of Web sites which sell merchandise > are doing so through affiliate programs, while they > offer significant [non-commercial] content...
More distortion. Perhaps the "vast majority" are affiliate sites? So what? A huge number of commercial sites don't make money and contribute little in content or anything else.
Affiliate sites are simply a way for a, gasp, Corporation to market their stuff. I liken it to MLM in the real world. It's a simple concept; show it in enough places and probably someone will buy. Smart buyers recognize multiple markups too!
Underlying this comment is the thought that somehow an affiliate is more deserving... more pure... more able to inform. What complete nonsense! If you want thorough and accurate information talk to the folks closest to the product source. They know more. Can afford more. Have access to documentation. Etc.
The Internet provides access to a vast array of information. Some of that information is commercial; it exists to sell something! It is corrupting and a great distortion of quality search results to suggest that "better" is not commercial. Commercial can be "different" but not inferior.
The "car radiators" searcher may want information on how they function? He alone bares the responsibility to add, information, reviews, design or other terms that will better serve his non commercial quest. Let's hope what he gets is something beyond XYZ Radiator Corp affiliate #231 who is publishing the canned crap he got to "get rich working at home".
Lanell Grant
------------------------------------------------------- The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks: pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains
Copyright 1995-2003 Adam Audette. All Rights Reserved. "I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand." - Confucius
|