Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2003 archives arrow LED Digest 1489: Defamation and the Internet
LED Digest 1489: Defamation and the Internet Print E-mail
==================================================
                bCentral Daily Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
           "Effective Online Advertising"
==================================================
List Moderator:                    Supported by:
Adam Audette                          bCentral
.................................................
January 2, 2003                      Digest #1489
.................................................


              .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


==== CONTINUING =================

        -=Predictions for 2003=-

                ~ Will Bontrager
"...in order to survive as a site selling products,
those products will need to be listed at Froogle."

                ~ Janet Attard
"[Our company] recently ran a survey..."

        -=Search Engines & Frames=-

                ~ Shari Thurow
"...sites save considerable time and expense
[with] search-engine friendly design templates..."

        -=Defamation and the Internet=-

                ~ Jill Whalen
"I thought it was Al Gore [who invented the Internet]?"

                ~ Donald Nelson
"...consider the issue from the point of view of
victims of defamation."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        -=Freelancing=-
                ~ Brian Douglas

        -=How to Create HTML Email?=-
                ~ Derek Andrews


===== CONTINUING =================================

From: Will Bontrager
Subject: 2003 Predictions

 > Froogle is going to shake up affiliate marketing
 > more than anybody dares to speculate today.
        - Edwin Hayward, Daily 1487

With a slogan like "All the world's products in one place" and a
record of accomplishment, you may be right. How much affiliates
will feel the pinch will probably depend more on how much the
Froogle database is consulted than on the completeness of the
database itself. Other avenues of finding products will still exist.

If the product searching public will flock to Froogle like the
Internet searching public now flocks to Google, then I expect
affiliate marketing will need to redefine itself, at least in part,
or suffer a decline. When affiliates no longer get viable returns,
they'll quit. When they quit, distributors have lost a sales
channel. Marketers may decide it is prudent to offer additional
incentives to keep affiliate channels open, or to find new channels.

I don't claim to be a marketer. I'm not. I'm a programmer. But
willmaster.com has been in business since 1998 and some marketing
concepts have settled into my consciousness.

It seems to me that in order to survive as an Internet web site
selling products, those products will need to be listed at Froogle.
Probably not now, but I expect soon, Froogle listed products will
have a huge marketing advantage over products not in their database.

Therefore, our Master Series CGI programs will be listed in
Froogle. And soon. The first product feed is on their servers, as
of this writing, but not yet in their database.

Froogle product feeds require a tab-delimited database with
specific fields. This will be an easy task for some. For others,
the idea may be somewhat daunting.

To help those who want it, I wrote a CGI program to generate the
files Froogle requires for product feeds. An installation is at
www.willmaster.com/master/generator/frooglefile/frooglefile.shtml
and it's free to use. Product records can be edited. And the local
data file can be kept on our servers up to six months, allowing you
to generate a new file whenever you need to feed the Froogle.

Check your products. They may be on Froogle already. Type in your
domain name and see what comes up. If you see your products listed,
chances are you would like to change the listing text, which was
the case for our software listings. Froogle product feeds could fix
that.

If you sell products on your site, see
froogle.google.com/froogle/merchants.html [cut & paste this link].
When you have your username, feel free to use our generator to
create product feed files.

Will Bontrager
www.willmaster.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Janet Attard
Subject: 2003 predictions

Business Know-How recently ran a survey to find out how small
businessess (mostly microenterprises) viewed the future.  The
survey (which is still live) is here:
www.businessknowhow.com/smallbizfeature/outlook2002fallsurvey.htm

The results are posted real-time, so you can see the results in
graph format immediately after taking the survey. If you just want
to view the results, you can do so from this link:
www.businessknowhow.com/smallbizfeature/outlook2002_fall_results.asp

Janet Attard

Business Know-How
businessknowhow.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Shari Thurow
Subject: Meaning of optimization

Hi all--

First, I would like to wish all Daily Digest subscribers a pleasant
holiday season.

This is in response to Mr. Jacobs' post on optimization (issue
1487).  As someone who has worked on sites ranging from small sites
to large, dynamic sites that get over 6 million unique visits a
month, I feel I can write intelligently on the topic of search
engine optimization (SEO) for all types of sites.

Mr. Jacobs and I disagree on what it means to optimize.  I have
always believed that if a site has been designed for search engine
visibility from the onset, which is optimal, that those sites tend
to do the best overall in terms of search engine
visibility.  (Along with having high quality content that your
target audience is searching for.)

For example, I worked on a division site of a major, huge
accounting firm, one whose brand all readers would immediately
recognize.  The site's branding, of course, is outstanding, which
is one of the main reasons the site has excellent link
popularity.  But a particular division's search engine visibility
was practically non-existent.

The problem wasn't that the site didn't contain quality content and
targeted keywords.  The problem was that the site design and server
performance did not allow search engine spiders easy access to that
information.  Their competitor's sites did allow easy access to
quality content, which is why their competitors fared better.

No amount of workarounds was going to change that.
Pay-for-inclusion (PFI) programs helped, but with a site of that
magnitude, it can get quite expensive. And not all search engines
offer this type of program. Pay-per-click programs can get quite
expensive as well.

I've worked on huge portal sites, including financial and medical
sites.  They also face similar problems.  The ones that have an
optimal site design and do not employ a bunch of workarounds always
fare better overall.  If other SEOs do not experience this, I am
rather surprised.  Many sites save considerable time and expense if
they only had search-engine friendly design templates and
keyword-rich copy.

As an online marketer, I have to work with other designers and
programmers all of the time.  Fortunately, I and others at our firm
have the background in design and usability that few other SEO
companies have.

Oh, since this came up in a previous Daily Digest, we keep a list
of helpful links on our site.  Our list of usability links are
at:  www.grantasticdesigns.com/usabilitylinks.html

Many of these web sites have free newsletters.  Many of them offer
conferences and training at reasonable prices.  Jared Spool is one
of my favorite usability experts.  If you cannot afford to attend
any of his conferences, you can purchase his conference proceedings
at a reasonable price.  Many usabililty experts have published
books as well, books that are available on their site and Amazon.com.

Again, I hope you are all having a pleasant holiday season.  Cheers!

Take care,

Shari Thurow, Webmaster/Marketing Director
www.grantasticdesigns.com/tips.html


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Jill Whalen
Subject: Defamation

 > If anyone can be considered to have invented
 > the Internet as we know it today it is probably...
 > Tim Berners-Lee.
        - Geoff Marshall, Daily 1488

I thought it was Al Gore? <grin>

Jill Whalen
www.highrankings.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Donald Nelson
Subject: Defamation

Dear All,

I noticed that most of the posts on this subject seemed to be
worrying about over-regulation of the Internet, and the rights of
the content provider and the possible liabilities that they face
from litigation.

But we also have to consider the issue from the point of view of
victims of defamation. Recently some friends of mine, doing social
service in a former communist country (with a very shaky human
rights record) were slandered by a website run by that country's
security services.

The fact that an Australian court dealt with a case originating in
another courntry may actually be helpful in such instances, as a
web publisher, who may be all powerful in his or her own country,
could face litigation in another country.

Sincerely,

Donald Nelson
www.a1-optimization.com


==== BILLBOARD ====================================

From: Brian Douglas
Subject: Freelance

 > Now the problem is either these [freelance listing]
 > sites charge [fees] which are unaffordable for individual
 > developers and the whole benefit is taken by big
 > established companies.
        - DS Sehdev, Daily 1487

I somewhat agree with your point about these freelance sites -- the
fees can be high.  However, if a person is serious about doing this
(design, etc.) as a business (instead of a "side job"), then I
truly believe that these fees become very reasonable.

And, the fees also help to weed out the majority of the
unprofessional community out there -- who are just trying to get in
and make a quick buck and don't care about things like customer
service and / or commitment.

I remember back when elance.com was free -- people were
under-pricing everything (by hundreds or thousands of dollars in
some cases).  And, you might be bidding against 300 people who were
claiming to be professionals -- yet promising to do things like
create logos for Fortune 100 companies for only $50 (or less in
many instances).

As a designer myself, I belong to several regional and national
business organizations.  And, one of the first things you learn
when you join one of these organizations is to NOT DEVALUE THE
PRODUCT!!!  The "product" in this case is professional design.

Brian Douglas
TradeShowJoe.com


------- new post - new topic -------

From: Derek Andrews
Subject: Flashy email

 > I have been trying to create flashy email to send
 > to my client list for some time. But whenever I put
 > HTML in email it simply doesn't work.
        - Franko Mandato, Daily 1485

If you are simply copying HTML code and pasting it into a 'regular'
email, that won't work. I don't know what email program you use,
but in Netscape I have to change the preferences to select the HTML
editor, rather than the plain text editor. (I imagine there must be
something in the email header to tell the recipient how to display
it.)

However, I never use HTML email. Personally I detest it, especially
if it uses images. As a dial-up user, this can severely impact
download times, and images cannot be accessed once I have gone
offline. I really have to want to read the message to bother with
it.

Incoming mail of this nature usually gets deleted or bounced, and I
generally unsubscribe from mailing lists that don't offer a
sensible plain text alternative. I also get the occasional HTML
email that won't even render in anything but the latest browser!

There are a few people who use HTML sensibly for formatting or
hyperlinks to bookmarks -- this improves the readability and
usability of the message, and I have no problem with that. But
think carefully about your clients reaction if they receive a
message that annoys them by its non-functionality.

Plain text rules, ok!

Derek Andrews, woodturner
www.sunrisewoodcrafts.ns.ca


-------------------------------------------------------
The bCentral Daily Digest is edited by a third party moderator,
Adam Audette. As such, bCentral does not control which postings are
accepted into the digest for publication.

The contents of the digest do not necessarily reflect the opinions
of bCentral, Adam Audette, or his company, Adventive. bCentral,
Audette, and Adventive make no warranties, either expressed or
implied, about the truth or accuracy of the contents of the
bCentral Daily Digest.