Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2006 archives arrow LED Digest 2237: Building a Business
LED Digest 2237: Building a Business Print E-mail
What does it take to build a business on a shoestring budget? How are
small businesses made? It would be very interesting to hear some real-world
experiences on the LED. Shoot away!

==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

      Data > Information > Knowledge > Wisdom

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
Hosting and Domain Registration from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam, led-digest.com     http://www.led-digest.com
..............................................
August 31, 2006                       Issue no. 2237
..............................................



            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....
                

====== NEW =====================

        --== Building a Business ==--

                ~ Tom Aman
"I would love to hear from Allan and Nancy some
details of what they did... to build their businesses."


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== Small Business Sites ==--

                ~ Eva Rosenberg
"Frankly, I've gotten fed up with professional
web designers."

                ~ Mark Whitman
"...not all affiliate marketers are 'bottom feeders'..."

        --== Browsers & Security [was: HTML Editors] ==--

                ~ Tom Aman
"The great fear that IE is dangerous to use is
really unfounded..."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== Income from Affiliate Marketing? ==--
                ~ Brett A. Simpson


========== NEW ===================================

From: Tom Aman
Subject: New Topic - Building a Business Online

> My amateurish sites generate enough revenue for me
> to employ three full-time employees and a few part-timers.
        - Allan Gardyne, LED 2236

> My websites are not "professional"... Still, they
> have worked well enough that the business has
> gone from just me-myself-and I five years ago,
> to six "official" employees, plus several work-at-home
> helpers.
        - Nancy Schettler, LED 2236

I would love to hear from Allan and Nancy some more details of what
else they did, aside from creating their own Web sites, to build
their businesses.  I am sure we would all benefit from their
experiences.

Tom Aman


======== CONTINUING ===============================

From: Eva Rosenberg
Subject: Small Biz Sites

> Then of course we have the affiliate marketers
> out there. They're a different breed, often bottom
> feeders with useless sites that pollute the internet...
        - Mark Whitman, LED 2234

Goodness Mark, such passion!

And such poor judgment. Please don't call all professionals in any
group "bottom feeders". There are some excellent, skilled pros who
create useful, informative sites, even if they do earn all their
incomes from commissions, instead of direct sales.

As to your statement about small businesses not being able to create
sites that are useful and hit high in the search engines - that's
utter nonsense. The search engines, even Google, still respond well
to good quality content. And small businesses have access to an
assortment of packages to enable them to build their own sites.

Frankly, I've gotten fed up with professional web designers. I've
spent 10s of thousands of dollars on the 'pro's, who've only delayed
the development of my sites, never delivered on their promises,
always insisted on using their own re-designs of my time-tested and
highly recognized logos, and simply didn't do the job. And never,
ever created a site that required members to log in to access the
wealth of the archived material. So I lost hundreds of thousands of
subscribers because they never needed to sign in, or sign up, to get
the newsletters or the articles. (Note: Traffic ranges from 50,000 -
200,000 page views per month)

I took my sites back a few months ago. Picked up the MemberStar.com
service and started moving the 20,000 plus pages of TaxMama.com to a
new, temporary home at TaxTwist.com . (It will revert to TaxMama.com
when the move is complete and all pages are reformatted.)

Even without my having designed a proper masthead, just using one
from an existing site I already had, the new site, TaxTwist.com,
immediately hit the top of the search engines for key terms relating
to one of my core products - the annual IRS licensing exam. It's
searched for under a variety of  names,  and most of those searches
point to the special section on TaxTwist.com devoted to news about
the exam.

http://taxtwist.com/element.php?varset=s:13-pm:p-se:264-e:64&SessId=

see - "ea exam news"

As I say, good content attracts hits. In most of the other searches,
where my site does not hit the top, several of the sites that do hit
the first two pages link to, or recommend, my course. And not
because I have a pretty, well-designed page. But because of the
solidity of the content and the course.

So, please, get off your high horse and open your mind.

Even lowly businesses, with the packaged design tools available to
them, can create sites that suit them and their client base without
having to battle prima donna designers.

And with the help of webhosts with 24/7 service, we can even get
help, when we mess things up on the site. I must tell you, my
experiences, being on my own this year, have been very, very
refreshing. And the folks whose software I am using have been
extremely responsive about modifications to the code or quick
revisions to things. Far better than any web designer I've had -
with no time wasted placating emotional tantrums.

(Of course, if I could find someone who's good, has the time, will
do what _I_ need and not what their ego insists upon, and is
affordable, I am definitely open to hiring a competent webmaster so
I could devote my time "do what they do best, run their business".)

If I may add one thing, though? The easiest time I ever had with a
site online, was when I was moderating the I-HelpDesk under the
umbrella of John and Adam Audette. They took care of everything. All
I had to do was sort through the posts and respond to people. That,
my friends, was heaven!

When it gets that simple again, I'll revive the HelpDesk.

Best wishes,

Eva Rosenberg

TaxMama.com - A daily cure for your tax blues
http://www.taxmama.com/taxquips


-------- new post - same topic --------

From: Mark Whitman
Subject: Small biz sites

> I don't know what "wide array" of techniques Mark is referring to -
> perhaps he can elaborate - but this notion that sites built with
> WYSIWYG editors are incapable of ranking well in the search
> engines is nothing more than a fantasy...
        - Steve Pronger LED 2235

Sure, I'll publish my competitive edge for you, but you'll have to
wait till I retire. What I will elaborate on is that the use of an
HTML editor in itself *might* not hurt you if you understand enough
about HTML, CSS, and sometimes programming (for the really tough
keywords) to SEO a page as effectively as possible. My point was
that you need to know what you're doing, you need to tweak HTML
editor generated tags and CSS by hand. If you think that's no more
than fantasy, great! I hope I'm competing with you for index
placement sometime.

> Stealthy? Is this why "pages I SEO end up in top 10
> very often"? Just wondered.

Sometimes, but only on the really tough keywords and only for my
personal projects. That's a risky game and I wouldn't play it with a
client's site.

> I get pages in the top 10 too... No stealth required
> at all. You think those terms are easy to rank for?

You did a great job but you knew what you were doing didn't you. The
point I was trying to make is that you can't just pick up an HTML
editor and get that kind of result without taking the time to learn
what you're doing.

> No hand coding (apart from the odd tweak).

Thank you - that's my point - you need the knowledge to use the odd
tweak.

> Any small business owner, or entrepreneur, can build a high
> ranking, high traffic and high converting website with the right
> tools, the right resources and a desire to learn and succeed.

Thank you again - that's my point - you have to know what you're
doing. The original post I responded to when I made the remarks
people are objecting to here was regarding someone's comment that a
SBO doesn't have the time to learn anything they just want to pick
up an HTML editor and go to work. In a very long winded edgy way I
was saying that would be a big mistake on the SBO's part. You can't
expect to achieve anything but failure until you take the time to
learn what you're doing.

> Your assessment of affiliate marketers is offensive
> and ignorant. I suggest you learn a little about
> the industry before mouthing off.

Well, not only do I work closely with the industry I also do
affiliate marketing from time to time, recommend affiliate marketing
to certain clients, and have an affiliate marketing project in the
works right now. What you chose to ignore was my qualification that
not all affiliate marketers are "bottom feeders" but many NOT ALL
are. Since you're so offended I'll even concede that *many* are not
"bottom feeders". If you've never seen one of the zillions of
useless, self-serving affiliate marketer sites, if you've never had
to compete with them for SE index placement or PPC keywords then
you're lucky or maybe you just can't tell the difference. And if you
happened to be one of those that cranks them out, I'd be thrilled
you're offended as that was the purpose of my little jab at the
*segment* of affiliate marketers that are nothing more than web
spammers.

M.Whitman


-------- new post - new topic --------

From: Tom Aman
Subject: Browser Security [was: HTML Editors]

> Due to security and virus concerns, I strictly
> run Firefox browser, Thunderbird email and
> AVS Virus protection. As a result, I have
> never (to my knowledge) had a virus...
        - Mark Roberts, LED 2235

Proves nothing, Mark.  The great fear that IE is dangerous to use is
really unfounded provided you run with reasonable protection.  I run
IE as my browser, Outlook Express as my email client, McAfee for
virus protection (very regularly and automatically updated) and
CounterSpy (also very regularly and automatically updated) as adware
protection.  I have never had a virus although my protection
software regularly catches attempts to infect my system.

Just because you use Firefox doesn't mean you are safe. A quote from
a volunteer Firefox promotion, Spread Firefox: "The versions of
Firefox up to version 1.0.3 have had terrible security risks".  See
http://snipurl.com/vpo4  [news.com] for the complete article.

Another article says:

------------------------
"The Mozilla Foundation on Wednesday pushed out a new version of
Firefox to patch three vulnerabilities, just days after a major
security firm said the open-source browser had 60 percent more
vulnerabilities in the last half of 2004 than Microsoft's Internet
Explorer."

See http://snipurl.com/vpo6  [informationweek.com]
------------------------

Yet another:

------------------------
"Security firm iDefense issued a public advisory today titled,
"Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Browser Out Of Memory Heap Corruption
Design Error." The vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute
arbitrary code and/or crash the browser."

See http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3486196.
------------------------

While some of these concerns date back over a year, the point is
that, just because you use Firefox, it does not mean you are safe.

> Unless you think I might be out in left field
> using these products, they are rapidly becoming
> the browser of choice and some arguments
> state that Firefox may soon overcome IE in popularity.

And the more popular Firefox becomes the more it will become the
browser of choice for malware attacks, particularly since the source
code is open for all to view - makes the work of malware creators
much easier when you don't have to reverse engineer the product.

Tom Aman

Aman Software
http://www.cyberspyder.com


==== BILLBOARD ===================================

From: Brett A. Simpson
Subject: Affiliate Marketing

> I'm an affiliate marketer. Given that affiliate
> marketing commissions are estimated to
> reach $6.5 billion (not including ad networks
> such as AdSense) in 2006, I expect there's
> one or two others as well.
        - Steven Rothberg, LED 2236

Hi Steven,

Ok, I have to ask you, since I've considered going this route myself
recently, exactly how much revenue does that Soccer site bring in
from affiliate links and Google adsense?  I'm curious, please split
out by Google, and by other Affiliate links?

Part of the reason this is interesting to me is because what you
have there is a local / community based website for locals, I'm
curious if they actually click through, make purchases and don't get
bothered by your savvy affiliate marketing on their soccer club
website?

Then, secondly, in this regard, how much of this is fully automated
by X SitePro?  Have you heard of other software, such as HyperVRE
over at: http://www.hypervre.com/homepage.php

Thank You,

Brett A. Simpson
http://www.thedreamtime.com


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

Copyright 1995-2006 Orange Wheel, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"Words, when well chosen, have so great a force in them, that a
description often gives us more lively ideas than the sight of
things themselves." - Joseph Addison