Marketing & SEO Discussion List - LED Digest

Home arrow Full Issues arrow 2005 archives arrow LED Digest 1927: Should SpamCop be Sacked?
LED Digest 1927: Should SpamCop be Sacked? Print E-mail
==================================================
                 The LED Digest
             Moderated Discussion List
     "Effective Online Advertising, Since 1997"

         pair Networks: The LED's Web Host
   Hosting and Domain Reg. from a Trusted Leader
  pair.com for Hosting  |  pairNIC.com for Domains

==================================================
List Moderator:                     Published by:
Adam Audette                          LED Digest
adam,led-digest.com      http://www.led-digest.com
...............................................
February 2, 2005                       Issue #1927
...............................................


            .....IN THIS DIGEST.....


====== NEW ======================

        --== Sacking SpamCop ==--

                ~ Bill Davison
"Recent problems beg for someone in the legal
profession to take SpamCop to the cleaners..."


==== CONTINUING =================

        --== The Google Rankings Thread ==--

                ~ Derek Andrews
"Yahoo and MSN both seem to be faster at
indexing new sites than Google..."

                ~ Dirk van der Werff
"...country returns in Google very much
depend on where your site is hosted."


        --== Dream Affiliate Programs ==--

                ~ Michael Martinez
"If you're as big as Amazon, you can treat
people like dirt and still make money."


==== BILLBOARD ===================

        --== PHP Concerns ==--
                ~ Nancy Cardinali


======= NEW =====================================

From: Bill Davison
Subject: SpamCop

Recent problems and recent internet posts beg for someone in the
legal profession to take SpamCop to the cleaners and initiate a
thorough spanking and housecleaning. Even their counterparts at
CAUCE have flogged their conduct.

http://www.politechbot.com/p-04126.html

It is now common knowledge that SpamCop has:

- transferred ownership
- does not accept any challenges to its threats of blacklisting IP
addresses

Spamcop now refuses to even respond to website owners legitimate
challenges to their vigilantism.

Many legitimate hosting companies now know that even one obviously
bogus complaint can cause their server to be blacklisted and admit
are being victimized by Spamcop's terror. This nonsense is adding
thousands in costs to legitimate website owners and hosting
companies.

Although I sincerely want spam eliminated as much as anyone,
SpamCop's tactics and usefulness borders on stupidity.

Therefore, anyone wanna take these rabid terrorists on - or know
where small legitimate businesses can join a class action lawsuit to
bring an end to Spamcop's arrogant vigilantism?

Bill Davison
bizwebpage.com


===== CONTINUING =================================

From: Derek Andrews
Subject: Google

> I have written a demonstration site for my company...
> The subsidiary image pages seem impossible to find,
> despite the fact that the site appears to be searched
> by Google fairly regularly.
        - James Miller, LED 1926

I think it is just a matter of time. Yahoo and MSN both seem to be
faster at indexing new sites than Google which seems to me to be
more cyclical that the other two, especially when it comes to
indexing backlinks on which its algorithm relies heavily. I did
notice that several of your pages have been cached within the last
day or so.

If the other search engines can index your whole site, then Google
should have no problem accessing them either. This doesn't mean to
say that you will achieve the same rankings as on those other sites.

Derek Andrews, woodturner
http://www.seafoamwoodturning.com


------- new post - same topic -------

From: Dirk van der Werff
Subject: Country Host & Google Searches

Hi .... managed with the help of another site or two to track down
why my UK Google results for  PLANTS magazine return so badly
compared to the results for the International Google  returns.  It
may be of interest to LED'ers.

I was told by my host that the site is hosted in London... it turns
out that it is hosted in Germany .

Which is why on the German Google page (www.google.de) I return top
place results for many many terms .. but not in the Uk.

I didn't realise that country returns in Google very much depend on
where your site is hosted... but it doesn't affect the international
Google returns... I shall now return to my host and ask why I was
told that my site was hosted in London , but is actually hosted in
Germany.

Any other feedback on your experiences with international Google
returns would be most interesting, and if you return poorly in a
country specific Google search engine... just check out where your
site is actually hosted... not where your host has told you it is
hosted.

Dirk van der Werff, Editor / Publisher

Plants / Aquilegia Publishing
http://www.plants-magazine.com/
dirk, plants-magazine.com


------- new post - new topic --------

From: Michael Martinez
Subject: Dream affiliate

In LED Digest 1925, Tom Aman and Ken Evoy took up the issue of
backlinking with me.  While I could respond to their arguments, this
discussion should stay focused on the key issue of what merchants
can do to make their affiliate programs more attractive.

Someone asked how flexible I am with my criteria for merchants.  I
am VERY flexible, as I have yet to find a perfect merchant match.

As far as linking back goes, in itself that is a minor issue.  I
pointed out that linking back is one of three things I want:

1) Linking back
2) Allowing me to frame your site
3) Allowing me to link as I wish

If you can't live with either option 1 or 2, but you CAN live with
option 3, we may do business.

Bottom line: Your inflexibility means I don't do business with you.
No rationalization or personal research will change that fact.

Merchants, in my experience, do best when they listen to their
affiliates (and customers) and take action upon what they are told.
Simply acknowledging someone's complaint or suggestion makes you
look insincere and arrogant.

If you're as big as Amazon, you can treat people like dirt and still
make money.  They do it all the time.  But they first had to become
big before they could do that.  There was a time when it was a
pleasure to do business with Amazon.  I gave up on them for a few
years, and my return to their program last year has not produced any
appreciable results.

For you smaller-than-amazon merchants, I ask: When someone like me,
with thousands of pages of content and thousands of regular monthly
visitors, offers to expand your market for you, why should you feel
like you're in a position to call the shots?  I'll partner with you
if there is an opportunity for mutual benefit.  I will NOT let you
tell me how to run my Web site.

In MY book, merchants are a dime a dozen.  I will only do business
with the flexible merchants, not the guys who quote their research
to me and tell me how they are right and I am wrong. I know what I
bring to the table.  I have found, time and again, that merchants
usually don't.

FOR EXAMPLE, a few years ago I did a great business with a vendor of
Department 56 (tm) collectibles (Department 56 doesn't have an
affiliate program -- you have to become an actual reseller).  I
earned hundreds of dollars in commissions from affiliate links.  It
was one of the best affiliate arrangement I ever had.  And then the
merchant lost their contract.

I've scoured the Web for another vendor, and one recently turned me
down because "Your site doesn't have a large enough user base." That
merchant NEVER BOTHERED TO ASK how many users I have. Clearly, they
are raking in so much money, hand over fist, they don't need my
help.  I wish them well.

Me, I'd still like to offer Department 56 (tm), Precious Moments
(tm), and Hello, Kitty (tm) collectibles to my community of
thousands of wives, mothers, daughters, aunts, and sisters who buy
these products like there is no tomorrow.  For now, I'm stuck with
the usual posters and calendars, books and DvDs, and same old stuff
everyone else links to.  The competition is fierce.

In fact, the best merchants are the newer, hungrier ones who are not
yet well known, who do offer unique, quality merchandise, and who
aren't concerned with how big your site is.  Merchants who are
willing to listen and be flexible.

Guys like me can help propel the hungry, flexible small business to
success.  I have actually had a significant impact on several small
businesses through the years.  I know of other people who have had
similar influence.  I can't break you, but I can help make you.

BTW -- someone asked about Calendars.Com.  I affiliate with them,
but the best time to sell their merchandise is just before
Christmas.  They advised me, when I first joined their program, not
to expect many sales after the annual holiday season (and their
stock eventually runs out in the spring). But they did send me a
check for my December sales.  That was good.

Michael Martinez
http://www.michael-martinez.com/


==== BILLBOARD ===================================

From: Nancy Cardinali
Subject: PHP & SEO

Dear LEDers,

Another SEO question.

I have been told I can use PHP (and probably other things) to 'hold'
things that go on every page in a web site, such as top & bottom
navigation, logos... whatever, making changes easier.

Assuming this is possible, would this be okay for search engines? If
all Navigation is off the page, will the spiders crawl the PHP
pages, make the connections and spider all the pages? With
Navigation ON the page, you have links which spiders follow, right?

Excuse my lack of precise language, but I think (hope) you know what
I mean.

Nancy Cardinali
nancy52,cwo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
The LED Digest is sponsored by pair Networks:
pair.com for Hosting | pairNIC.com for Domains

© Copyright 1995-2004 Adam Audette. All Rights Reserved.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

"The home is the chief school of human virtues."
- William Ellery Channing